Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to Alexander Hamilton, what authority does Parliament have over the colonies?
According to Alexander Hamilton, what authority does Parliament have over the colonies?
- Authority over trade, but not internal affairs
- Unlimited authority in all matters
- No authority whatsoever
- Only the authority the colonies directly consented to (correct)
According to James Wilson, where does absolute power reside?
According to James Wilson, where does absolute power reside?
- In the people (correct)
- In the Parliament
- In the monarchy
- In the laws of nature
According to the Summary View of the Rights of British America, who are the colonists subject to?
According to the Summary View of the Rights of British America, who are the colonists subject to?
- Parliament
- The House of Commons
- The King (correct)
- Local colonial assemblies
According to Dan Foster, what is the foundation of all rights of dominion and authority?
According to Dan Foster, what is the foundation of all rights of dominion and authority?
According to Common Sense, what is the best description of government?
According to Common Sense, what is the best description of government?
According to the Declaration of Independence, who is blamed for wrongdoings?
According to the Declaration of Independence, who is blamed for wrongdoings?
What is identified as a 'self evident truth'?
What is identified as a 'self evident truth'?
What does 'rights' act as?
What does 'rights' act as?
What is the meaning of 'Nature'?
What is the meaning of 'Nature'?
According to James Wilson, what does government provide?
According to James Wilson, what does government provide?
Flashcards
Main Argument of Farmer Refuted
Main Argument of Farmer Refuted
Parliament has no authority over colonies if the colonies have not directly consented to the laws.
Hamilton's Premise 1
Hamilton's Premise 1
King is sovereign, British Constitution is a limited monarchy
Hamilton's Premise 2
Hamilton's Premise 2
People have rights to protect their natural rights.
James Wilson's Argument
James Wilson's Argument
Signup and view all the flashcards
Happiness of Society
Happiness of Society
Signup and view all the flashcards
Jefferson's Main Argument
Jefferson's Main Argument
Signup and view all the flashcards
Dan Foster's Main Argument
Dan Foster's Main Argument
Signup and view all the flashcards
Letter One Purpose
Letter One Purpose
Signup and view all the flashcards
DOI Interpretation 2
DOI Interpretation 2
Signup and view all the flashcards
4 Self Evident Truths
4 Self Evident Truths
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Alexander Hamilton: The Farmer Refuted
- The main argument emphasizes natural rights
- Parliament's authority over colonies is limited to laws they consented to
- Parliament cannot legislate because Great Britain is a limited monarchy
Premise 1: Sovereignty Resides with the King
- The British Constitution has limited monarchy
- Limited by checks and balances from the House of Commons
- The House of Commons relies on the people
- The House of Commons’ original rights do not extend to life, liberty, and property
- People possess rights to both the law of nature and state of nature
- Colonists cannot elect representatives to consent in Great Britain
- Sovereignty belongs to the King, not Parliament
- If the colonies want to remain with the Britain, the King should have the sovereignty
Premise 2: Natural Rights
- Natural rights should be protected
James Wilson: British Parliament's Authority
- The British Parliament has no legislative authority over colonies
- Wilson opposed Blackstone, stating absolute power should reside in Parliament
- "The happiness of society is the first law of every government"
- This influenced the Declaration of Independence
Premise 1: Popular Sovereignty
- The question of where sovereignty lies is investigated
- Sovereignty is within the people
- All people have equal rights
- Governments exist for the happiness of the people
Premise 2: Societal Happiness
- Governments ensure security versus encroachments
- Laws require approval from commons, lords and the King
- Power is derived from the people’s suffrage
- Parliament representatives are subject to term limits and reelection
- These ideas support popular sovereignty
Premise 3: Constitution as a Limited Monarchy
- The House of Commons power emerged to limit the monarchy and comes from the people
- The House of Commons prevents funds for the the King’s wars
- Power to tax requires consent of the people which they did not give
Jefferson: A Summary View of the Rights of British America
- Parliament lacks authority and the colonists are subject to the king only
- American immigrants are similar to Saxon immigrants because they mixed labor with the land
- Common law is rooted in the right to property
- There have been less alarming violations of rights
- Repeated suppression equates to slavery
- Every society should possess legislation powers
- The King gifting land creates issues of ownership
- Jefferson criticizes the King for not using his veto on Parliament
- Rights derive from laws of nature
Dan Foster
- The government does not derive its power from God
- Rights of dominion and authority are based on property
- State of nature means every individual has property in their body plus other rights
- Someone may want a wife, family, and home/estate, in the state of nature to defend themself
- The State of Nature lacks civil government and guidelines when injury occurs, such as theft or enslavement
- Anything is blamed on the first person who did the injury
- Either subject to one strong guy or subject to a mob of weak people
- The people can establish a civil government, make rulers supreme and subordinate, and invest them with power and authority
- Law should promote good, liberty, protection and peace
- Government is established when
- The form of government is unimportant
- People relinquish their right to personal defense in ordinary cases, but maintain that right in extraordinary cases
- People give up property to support magistrates, therefore taxation
- The people must bear the changes of war
Dan Foster on Taxation and Dethroning
- Colonists’ taxation is justified
- The people have the right and authority to dethrone their king if they do not have the right to secure their own interest
- Boucher's views are questioned, in reference to the "doctrine of hell"
- People dethrone kings instead of God
Common Sense by Thomas Paine
- A "polemic" means a sharp argument against an opposing view
- Advocated for a unicameral government, not bicameral
Premise 1: Society vs. Government
- Society is a blessing, while government is a necessary evil (415)
- Similar to Boucher's arguments
- Security and freedom are the ends of government
- Government is needed to help people restrain vices
- The origin of government comes from moral virtue
Premise 2: Critique of English Constitution
- Monarchy is always tyrannical
- Aristocracy is always tyrannical
- The House of Commons is the only virtuous branch due to "Republican materials"
- Nature disapproves of monarchy
Premise 3: The Debate is Over
- The debate is over and violence will decide things
- A new era for politics has begun
- The blood of the slain cries out for separation
- The colonists have nothing to lose and everything to gain
- A government of our own is a natural right
Thomas Jefferson and Declaration of Independence Letters
- The declaration of independence was only left after changes were requested to Great Britain
- An appeal to the tribunal of the world justifies resorting to arms for redress
- A declaration helps provide the spirit called for by the occasion
- The documents should all prove the facts and principles advanced in that Declaration
- It made a difference in the years to come
Continued Impact of the Declaration
- Citizens continue to approve the choice after half a century
- The Declaration restores the right to reason and freedom of opinion
- The rights of mankind are a sign of hope for others
Declaration of Independence: Background
- "Human events" refers to history between Great Britain and the colonies
- The Declaration of Independence became necessary after 12 years of arguing
Declaration of Independence: Formation of Rights
- Natural rights took time to form and recognize
- Otis and Bland picked up on natural rights
- Bland was disregarded for recommending patience to the government's civil rights violations
- Scientists like Newton influenced the Laws of Nature with scientific laws
- Founding fathers considered morality laws over time
Declaration of Independence: Focus on the King
- The King is blamed for the Declaration of Independence
- This was a change from blaming Parliament
- Blaming the King was more logical because colonists pledged allegiance to him, not parliament
- The King never tried to fix things
Declaration of Independence: Character
- It has moral and political character, not legal
- Prudence is wisdom gained from experience
- Revolt is justified after abuses and usurpations, that cause absolute Despotism
- The DOI can be interpreted in two ways: syllogistically or self evident
Declaration of Independence: Syllogism
- Syllogism follows the form:
- Socrates is a mortal because all men are mortal
- Socrates is a man
- The syllogism's major premise: “We hold these truths"
- Minor premise: Prudence & list of injuries
- Conclusion: Last paragraph of DOI
- The fundamental premise accepts the document affirming colonies are free and independent
- Otherwise leave America
Declaration of Independence: Self Evidence
- Self-evidence of truths is seen after of reason and demonstration
- Truths are demonstrable because they rest on foundations of self-evident perceptions
- Self evidence is derived reasoning
DOI at a Closer Look
- Necessary means morally necessary
- Laws of Nature
- Nature's God
- Law of Nature and Nature's God are interchangeable for the purpose of class
- The nature is an objective moral standard like
- Universal, eternal, indisputable and permanent characteristics
- The document appeals to that same nature
- "Decent respect to the opinions of mankind"
- Refers to the audience of the document
- Appeals to mankind everywhere and for all time
- Lists the causes that made the Founders consider seperating
Declaration of Independence: Word Breakdown
- We
- Refers to five committee Drafters of
- Constitutional Congress
- The Americans
- Any person who submits to the truths of the document
- Intended as a show for France and Spain
- Hold means more than a belief to that
- Are accepted, embraced, and adhered to
- "These Truths"
- Notions which are not Oprah
- Truths that Are absolute, certain, universal, permanent, and immutable
- Transcends time/place because human nature is fixed
- "Self Evident"
- An 18th century term for something strongly debated
- Jefferson got it from Liam Duncan, who learned it from William Strong
Declaration of Independence: Self Evident Truths
-
Four core principles: equality, rights, consent, and revolution
-
Equality can mean:
-
Everyone born naked/all flesh, etc., or all people are equal in rights
-
Otis says that the first simple rule of morality is equality
-
Rights and consent naturally come next, if one believes Otis
-
Rights
-
Act as a license and a fence
-
Nobody should be allowed to encroach on yours
-
An operating boundary to do as one chooses
-
Includes life, liberty and also the pursuit of happiness
-
Life means:
- First we must preserve ourselves (obvious)
-
We must be allowed to preserve without interference with others
-
The negative side means: no interference with others
-
The positive side is access to whatever is needed to preserve it
-
Liberty
-
The means between Life and the Pursuit of Happiness
-
The most comprehensive right
-
Usually seen most with Founders' writings The means to accomplish
-
Acquire, use, or dispose of property
-
Pursuit of Happiness
-
Can be interpreted in one of two ways
-
Happiness is the result of a particular, excellent way of life (Aristotelian)
-
The result should be the most morally excellent possible action
-
Happiness consists in the enjoyment of pleasure without any considerable mixture of uneasiness’
-
The means to an End is when everything is moving correctly
Consent and Revolution as Natural Rights
- Consent: Securing rights is the most fundamental reason needed for government
- A list of rights is not exhaustive, so property is not listed
- “Derived power from consent of the governed” comes from
- Consent Given, and especially
- Consent Withdrawn
- Alteration and possibly the abolition of government
- Freedom of movement derived from withdrawing away from the individual
- Revolution
- As one people dissolve the bonds which connect them
- You have the natural moral right to revolution under the declaration of Independence
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.