Hamilton vs. Seabury: Revolutionary Arguments

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Samuel Seabury warns against the revolution, claiming that those who promote it:

Seek peaceful resolutions through dialogue.
Have the best economic policies.
Do not have your interests at heart. (correct)
Are supported by the King of England.

In the exchange, Alexander Hamilton criticizes Seabury primarily for:

Advocating for complete separation from Britain.
His eloquence and persuasive arguments.
Supporting the Continental Congress.
Repeating himself and lacking substantive debate. (correct)

When Hamilton says, 'And what about Boston? Look at the cost, n' all that we've lost,' he is most likely referring to:

The hardships and losses suffered due to British actions. (correct)
The financial success of Boston merchants.
The superior living conditions in Boston compared to other colonies.
The economic benefits of remaining a British colony.

The line, 'Why should a tiny island across the sea regulate the price of tea?' encapsulates which core grievance of the American colonists:

The colonists' lack of representation in the British Parliament and unfair taxation. (A) Signup and view all the answers

What is suggested by Burr's line, 'Burr, I'd rather be divisive than indecisive, drop the niceties'?

He believes in direct and decisive action, even if it causes conflict. (B) Signup and view all the answers

What is a central theme of the exchange between Hamilton and Seabury?

The contrasting views on the legitimacy and consequences of revolution. (C) Signup and view all the answers

What can be inferred from the repeated phrase 'For shame'?

A sense of outrage or disapproval towards a particular action or belief. (B) Signup and view all the answers

Considering the context of pre-Revolutionary America, the phrase 'A message from the king' most likely represents:

An assertion of royal authority and a warning against dissent. (A) Signup and view all the answers

How does Hamilton use sarcasm to discredit Seabury's arguments?

By comparing Seabury's speech unfavorably to a dog's eloquence and questioning his sanity. (D) Signup and view all the answers

How does the structure and style of the lyrics reflect the conflict between revolutionary and loyalist viewpoints?

Through a point/counterpoint dynamic with contrasting opinions presented rapidly and assertively. (B) Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Samuel Seabury's Warning

Samuel Seabury warns against the Continental Congress, cautioning against the chaos and bloodshed of revolution.

Revolution's Impetus

A counter-argument suggesting that the revolution is coming, driven by the 'have-nots'.

Tea Price Regulation

Highlights the absurdity of a small island (England) controlling the price of tea in the colonies.

Divisive vs. Indecisive

Expresses a preference for decisive action (even if divisive) over indecision.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Message from the King

A command symbolizing the King's authority and demand for obedience.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Samuel Seabury presents "Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress."
Seabury warns against the "rabble" advocating revolution, claiming they don't have the public's best interests in mind.
Seabury believes chaos and bloodshed are not the answer.
Seabury asserts the Continental Congress doesn't represent him.
Seabury hopes for the King's mercy.
Alexander Hamilton argues that the revolution is coming and the common people will win.
Hamilton believes chaos and bloodshed are already present.
Hamilton questions Seabury's fitness to speak, referencing the events in Boston and criticizing Seabury stance on the Congress.
Hamilton mocks Seabury's arguments.
Hamilton urges Seabury to be quiet.
Hamilton questions why a small island should control the price of tea.
Burr expresses a preference for divisiveness over indecisiveness.
A message from the king is delivered.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Arguments between Alexander Hamilton and Samuel Seabury are presented. Hamilton defends the revolution and common people, while Seabury warns against revolution, advocating for the King's mercy. The conflict highlights differing views on revolution.