Hamer v. Sidway Case Study
5 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

The uncle promised his nephew £5,000 for refraining from drinking, smoking, swearing, and playing cards until he turns 21.

True

The court ruled that the contract was unenforceable because the nephew was not giving up any rights.

False

The case of Hamer v. Sidway involves a dispute between two brothers.

False

The promise made by the uncle was considered legally enforceable by the court.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The nephew was over 21 years old when he complied with the uncle's conditions.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

More Like This

Contract Law Quiz
22 questions

Contract Law Quiz

ColorfulTaylor avatar
ColorfulTaylor
Hamer v. Sidway Case Quiz
5 questions

Hamer v. Sidway Case Quiz

WellPositionedProsperity avatar
WellPositionedProsperity
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser