Recent Lessons

Show all results for ""

Feature Overview

Ace your exams with our all-in-one platform for creating and sharing quizzes and tests.

Quizzes

Create quizzes and tests automatically from your content using AI.

Flashcards

Automatically turn your notes into digital flashcards.

Share, Export & Embed

Share with classmates or export to Excel and your learning management system.

Stats & Reporting

Auto-grading quizzes and tests with detailed stats and reports.

Mobile Apps

The smarter way to study – wherever you are.

Pricing Schools Business

Features Pricing Schools Business

5 Questions

0 Views

Grounds for Review: Superior Courts Act

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz

Study Flashcards

Spaced Repetition

Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which of the following is NOT a ground for review under the Superior Courts Act?

Admission of inadmissible evidence

Presence of a strong defense (correct)

Cross irregularity in the proceedings

Absence of jurisdiction of court to hear matter

Bias or malice on the part of a presiding officer constitutes one of the grounds for review.

True (A)

List one ground for review related to the procedure during proceedings.

Cross irregularity in the proceedings

The grounds for review include the admission of ______ evidence.

<p>incompetent</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following grounds for review with their explanations:

<p>Absence of jurisdiction = Court lacks authority to hear the case Bias = Prejudgment by the presiding officer Cross irregularity = Procedural mistakes during the trial Admissible evidence = Valid evidence incorrectly excluded</p> Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Grounds for Review (Superior Courts Act, s22)

Lack of Court Jurisdiction: A court may be deemed to lack the authority to hear a case, leading to review.
Bias, Malice, or Corruption: Allegations of bias, malicious intent, or corruption involving a presiding officer are grounds for review.
Procedural Irregularity: Significant procedural errors or irregularities in the proceedings are grounds for review.
Evidence Issues: Admission or rejection of evidence (admissible/incompetent, or inadmissible/competent) may be subject to review.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Explore the key grounds for review as outlined in section 22 of the Superior Courts Act. This quiz will cover topics such as lack of jurisdiction, bias, procedural irregularities, and issues concerning evidence. Test your understanding of these critical legal concepts.