Podcast
Questions and Answers
What notation is used to denote the adele ring of a global field F?
What notation is used to denote the adele ring of a global field F?
Which subset is contained in AF and denotes the adeles integral at places away from S?
Which subset is contained in AF and denotes the adeles integral at places away from S?
In the context of the given content, which statement best describes the role of topological spaces?
In the context of the given content, which statement best describes the role of topological spaces?
How is the topology on X(AF) characterized in relation to the choice of presentation of Γ(X, OX)?
How is the topology on X(AF) characterized in relation to the choice of presentation of Γ(X, OX)?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the coordinate ring Γ(X, OX) represent in the context of affine X?
What does the coordinate ring Γ(X, OX) represent in the context of affine X?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the nature of the zero set defined by the functions f: AnF → AF where f ∈ I?
What is the nature of the zero set defined by the functions f: AnF → AF where f ∈ I?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the result about topologizing X(R) for affine finite type R-schemes X stated in the proposition?
What is the result about topologizing X(R) for affine finite type R-schemes X stated in the proposition?
Signup and view all the answers
To what does the term 'separated finite type F-scheme' refer?
To what does the term 'separated finite type F-scheme' refer?
Signup and view all the answers
Which property must a map inherit upon base change to some Ai if it has property P in the context of finitely presented A-schemes?
Which property must a map inherit upon base change to some Ai if it has property P in the context of finitely presented A-schemes?
Signup and view all the answers
What does it mean for a finitely presented Ai0-scheme Xi0 to be essentially unique upward to essentially unique isomorphism?
What does it mean for a finitely presented Ai0-scheme Xi0 to be essentially unique upward to essentially unique isomorphism?
Signup and view all the answers
In the context of descent for finitely presented schemes, what ensures that the natural map of sets is bijective?
In the context of descent for finitely presented schemes, what ensures that the natural map of sets is bijective?
Signup and view all the answers
Which property from the list is NOT included as property P for maps between finitely presented A-schemes?
Which property from the list is NOT included as property P for maps between finitely presented A-schemes?
Signup and view all the answers
What is suggested about the finitely presented A-scheme X when referenced as being 'spread out' over the curve Spec OF,S?
What is suggested about the finitely presented A-scheme X when referenced as being 'spread out' over the curve Spec OF,S?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following pairs of finitely presented Ai0-schemes does not necessitate an isomorphism upon base change to A?
Which of the following pairs of finitely presented Ai0-schemes does not necessitate an isomorphism upon base change to A?
Signup and view all the answers
When defining XS0 over OF,S0, which condition must be met regarding the set of places?
When defining XS0 over OF,S0, which condition must be met regarding the set of places?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the concept of 'descents' refer to in the context of finitely presented A-schemes?
What does the concept of 'descents' refer to in the context of finitely presented A-schemes?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the notation $R = j RVj$ represent in terms of the product decomposition of rings?
What does the notation $R = j RVj$ represent in terms of the product decomposition of rings?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the significance of the map $φ: Spec( Ri ) → Spec B$ in terms of affine schemes?
What is the significance of the map $φ: Spec( Ri ) → Spec B$ in terms of affine schemes?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the role of the product topology on $XS (AF,S )$?
What is the role of the product topology on $XS (AF,S )$?
Signup and view all the answers
When checking the map $XS 0 (AF,S 0 ) → XS 00 (AF,S 00 )$, what specific property is being verified?
When checking the map $XS 0 (AF,S 0 ) → XS 00 (AF,S 00 )$, what specific property is being verified?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the valuative criterion for separatedness imply about $XS$ when it is stated to be separated?
What does the valuative criterion for separatedness imply about $XS$ when it is stated to be separated?
Signup and view all the answers
In terms of factor maps, what does the term 'base change map' refer to?
In terms of factor maps, what does the term 'base change map' refer to?
Signup and view all the answers
Why is it important to show that the natural map $XS,v (Ov) → Xv (Fv)$ is continuous and open?
Why is it important to show that the natural map $XS,v (Ov) → Xv (Fv)$ is continuous and open?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the term 'injective' refer to in the context of mappings between topological spaces?
What does the term 'injective' refer to in the context of mappings between topological spaces?
Signup and view all the answers
What is necessary for the product map (f, g) to factor through the diagonal morphism ∆X/C?
What is necessary for the product map (f, g) to factor through the diagonal morphism ∆X/C?
Signup and view all the answers
Which property of V is essential when there are infinitely many nonzero Ri's?
Which property of V is essential when there are infinitely many nonzero Ri's?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the diagram involving the morphism (f, g) illustrate?
What does the diagram involving the morphism (f, g) illustrate?
Signup and view all the answers
What must be true to prove that the only quasi-compact subscheme V containing U is Spec(R)?
What must be true to prove that the only quasi-compact subscheme V containing U is Spec(R)?
Signup and view all the answers
If V is closed in Spec(R), what can be said about the open complement Spec(R) - V?
If V is closed in Spec(R), what can be said about the open complement Spec(R) - V?
Signup and view all the answers
What characterizes U as a subscheme of Spec(R)?
What characterizes U as a subscheme of Spec(R)?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the hypothesis of quasi-compactness of X imply about the morphism in the diagram?
What does the hypothesis of quasi-compactness of X imply about the morphism in the diagram?
Signup and view all the answers
When considering U's relation to V, what can one conclude if U is contained within V?
When considering U's relation to V, what can one conclude if U is contained within V?
Signup and view all the answers
What does density imply about a non-closed subset of a compact Hausdorff space?
What does density imply about a non-closed subset of a compact Hausdorff space?
Signup and view all the answers
In the scenario where n = 1, which of the following is true about the resulting subspace topology?
In the scenario where n = 1, which of the following is true about the resulting subspace topology?
Signup and view all the answers
Which statement regarding the proper map X → Y between separated F-schemes is correct?
Which statement regarding the proper map X → Y between separated F-schemes is correct?
Signup and view all the answers
What does weak approximation imply in the context of matrices over F?
What does weak approximation imply in the context of matrices over F?
Signup and view all the answers
What is true about the bijection in Theorem 3.6 regarding Pn(AF)?
What is true about the bijection in Theorem 3.6 regarding Pn(AF)?
Signup and view all the answers
When FS is a finite non-empty set of places of F, what characterizes FS?
When FS is a finite non-empty set of places of F, what characterizes FS?
Signup and view all the answers
Which of the following is a consequence of properness in the map X → Y for separated F-schemes?
Which of the following is a consequence of properness in the map X → Y for separated F-schemes?
Signup and view all the answers
Which conclusion can be drawn when varying S in relation to Pn(F)?
Which conclusion can be drawn when varying S in relation to Pn(F)?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the nature of the induced map fS between the separated OF,S-schemes XS0 and XS?
What is the nature of the induced map fS between the separated OF,S-schemes XS0 and XS?
Signup and view all the answers
Which two conditions need to be verified for the openness of the map on Fv-points?
Which two conditions need to be verified for the openness of the map on Fv-points?
Signup and view all the answers
What does the acronym OF,S represent in this context?
What does the acronym OF,S represent in this context?
Signup and view all the answers
What is required to prove the surjectivity of the map on kv-points for all but finitely many v 6∈ S?
What is required to prove the surjectivity of the map on kv-points for all but finitely many v 6∈ S?
Signup and view all the answers
What does it mean for Villanueva schemes in the context described?
What does it mean for Villanueva schemes in the context described?
Signup and view all the answers
Which statement accurately reflects the properties of the smooth map fS,v?
Which statement accurately reflects the properties of the smooth map fS,v?
Signup and view all the answers
How is the topology on a product space determined?
How is the topology on a product space determined?
Signup and view all the answers
What characterizes the fields that enable the smooth map condition as mentioned?
What characterizes the fields that enable the smooth map condition as mentioned?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Weil and Grothendieck Approaches to Adelic Points
- Weil defines "adelization" as a process for algebraic varieties over global fields.
- Grothendieck provides an alternative approach using adelic points.
- The note proves that Weil's adelization process and Grothendieck's adelic points are equivalent (set-theoretically) for schemes of finite type over global fields, and separated algebraic spaces of finite type over these fields.
- The affine case of the topologies coincide.
- The note explores properties of these topologies, especially for adelic points and Weil restriction of scalars.
- The generalization to algebraic spaces is also explored .
- Adeles are denoted by AF, and Euclidean space over AF is denoted by A.
Preliminary Functorial Considerations
- F is a global field with a finite non-empty set S of places containing the archimedean places.
- AF,S is an open subring of adeles that are integral at places outside S.
- AF is a topological ring as the direct limit of AF,S.
- The set of adelic points X(AF) for a separated scheme X of finite type over F is endowed with a Hausdorff locally compact topological structure.
- This structure is functorial in AF and compatible with the creation of fiber products (for topological spaces and F-schemes)
Elimination of Affinicity Hypotheses
- The direct limit setup is for separated, finite-type F-schemes X is intrinsic to X.
- For affine X, X (AF) is topologized as a subspace of the product space.
- Using techniques like passing to finite-type OF,S schemes, the topological results from the affine case can be extended to general (finite type) schemes.
- Theorems 3.4(1) and 3.6 provide the general case by constructing an adequate topology.
- Open affine immersions need to be compatible.
- Example 2.2: Continuous maps of topological rings.
- Example 2.3: If F is discrete in AF and Fn is discrete in A, then X(F) → X(AF) is a topological embedding onto a discrete subset for affine X over F.
- Example 2.4: Module-finite ring extensions and Weil restriction.
Topological Properties
- The adelic points X (AF) of a separated, finite type F-scheme X, are locally compact and Hausdorff.
- Example 4.1: X = Spec R → X(AF), R is not discrete (e.g., adele ring AF ).
- X(F) → X(AF) is a topological embedding onto a discrete subset if X is affine-finite type over OF,S.
- Theorems 3.4 and 3.6 are needed.
- Theorem 3.4(2). Properties like "closed immersion" carry over to adelic points.
Algebraic Spaces
- The previous methods are extended to separated algebraic spaces of finite type over global fields F.
- Theorem 5.9 - Smooth surjective maps induce an open map on adelic points, provided fibers are geometrically connected.
- Theorem 5.9. The induced map X'(AF) → X(AF) is open.
- Corollary 5.6, Proposition 5.7, and Proposition 5.8 are extended from schemes to algebraic spaces.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Related Documents
Description
This quiz explores the concepts related to the adele ring of a global field F. It delves into topological spaces, coordinate rings, and properties of finite type F-schemes. Test your understanding of these advanced topics in algebraic geometry and number theory.