General Study Notes Inquiry

What does the automatic detention of persons charged with aggravated sexual battery on a minor violate?

What is stated as the legitimate objective of the bail system?

What principle does bail set at an amount too great for an indigent defendant violate?

What can be inferred about Ashton's expectation of privacy regarding his computer?

What was the primary reason Officer Brig stopped Yasmin and Betty's truck?

What was the outcome of Ashton being detained by agents?

What argument does Ashton use to suppress the images found on his computer?

What did Officer Brig smell upon approaching the vehicle?

What is the primary focus of the Fourth Amendment in the context of searches?

What did Yasmin admit to Officer Brig after being pulled over?

What must occur for Matt's consent to be considered valid after he expressed a desire for a lawyer?

What action did Officer Brig take to investigate the contents of the canvas bags?

In the scenario described, what might justify the agents' search of Ashton's computer?

What is a key reason for denying the motion concerning Matt's consent?

What was found inside Betty's bag that led to their arrest?

What is the legal basis on which Betty seeks to suppress the evidence found in her bag?

Which of the following statements best summarizes the situation leading to Reuben being arrested?

What did Officer Brig do before he inspected the canvas bags?

What evidence did the government seek to admit during Reuben's trial?

What factor contributed to the police conducting sobriety tests on Reuben?

Which statement best represents the probable cause regarding Officer Brig's actions?

Why might the recorded statements made by Reuben at the Detention Center be important?

Which of the following rights is associated with Miranda warnings?

What could be a possible impact of failing to give Reuben Miranda warnings before questioning?

What was the attorney's primary objection during the line-up procedure?

What was the outcome of the line-up identification for Jordan?

What was the trial court's response to the attorney's request to suppress the pre-trial identification evidence?

What did the trial court also deny besides the suppression of identification evidence?

What was Jordan ultimately charged with following the line-up?

How did the police handle the attorney during the line-up?

What is a significant aspect of the Sixth Amendment challenge in Jordan's case?

What was the reason given by the police for denying the attorney's presence during witness interviews?

What legal right did Matt invoke while speaking to the officers about his situation?

What should the district court do regarding Matt’s claim that his statements should be excluded based on invoking the right to counsel?

In what context did Matt attempt to contact his lawyer?

What led to the officers wanting to question Matt about a gambling operation?

What was the reason Matt led the officers to the stash of marijuana?

What did the officers do prior to questioning Matt about the gambling operation?

Why might the district court deny Matt's motion to exclude the drugs found in his store?

What was the consequence of officers questioning Matt about gambling after he invoked his right to counsel?

What constitutional right may Amy argue was violated by Detective Henderson's actions?

What is the best reason for Amy to suppress her confession?

Which option correctly describes the situation regarding the police tap on Marlene's telephone conversation?

What would be a potential consequence of Amy's confession if it is deemed inadmissible?

What must Amy demonstrate to successfully argue her motion to suppress the confession?

Based on the scenario, why did the police not complete the paperwork for the phone tap immediately?

What might be a key factor in determining the legality of the police's wiretapping of the phone?

What legal principle might support the argument that Detective Henderson did not honor Amy's request for counsel?