Untitled Quiz
5 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What led to the serious finger injury during the emergency recovery of the ROV?

  • The crane wire pinched the worker's finger during hook retrieval. (correct)
  • The crane operator misjudged the distance to the FRC.
  • The ROV was improperly secured to the FRC.
  • The worker was not wearing appropriate gloves.

    • What crucial step was missing from the emergency recovery plan that contributed to the incident?

  • The toolbox talk did not include all relevant personnel.
  • The risk assessment was conducted too late.
  • Releasing the ROV hook from the crane wire was not identified as a necessary step. (correct)
  • The process for securing the ROV was overlooked.

    • Which of the following actions was taken after the incident occurred?

  • Training in general safety practices was increased across the board.
  • The crane operator was retrained on proper hook retrieval.
  • A toolbox talk was held for all personnel involved.
  • The Emergency Recovery procedure and risk assessment were reviewed and updated. (correct)

    • What factor contributed positively to the planning of the recovery operation?

    <p>A thorough toolbox talk was conducted with all relevant personnel.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Before the emergency recovery operation, what should have been done regarding the latching mechanism on LARS?

    <p>Fault finding and repair should have been attempted prior to the recovery.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Incident Details

    • A worker suffered a finger injury while recovering a remotely operated vehicle (ROV)
    • The injury occurred when the worker's finger was caught between a crane wire and the ROV recovery hook.
    • The incident happened during an emergency ROV recovery operation using a small boat (FRC).
    • Crane hook attached to an emergency sling on the ROV.
    • The ROV hook was initially secured using a rope.
    • The worker was tasked with attaching the emergency rigging back to the crane, and connecting to securing lines.
    • The worker's task included releasing the ROV hook using a knife.
    • The worker's finger was caught and amputated while detaching the hook.

    Recovery Process

    • A small boat (FRC) facilitated the connection of ROV emergency rigging to the crane hook.
    • The crane's headache ball was submerged slightly.
    • The crane was controlled by a forerunner with ropes.
    • The plan was for a second person to use a boathook to retrieve the ROV hook.
    • The crane operator retrieved the emergency rigging from the ROV and secured it to the FRC.
    • The FRC moved away from the vessel.

    Root Cause Analysis and Actions Taken

    • Critical step of releasing the ROV hook from the crane wire was not identified.
    • Insufficient planning and procedure detailing.
    • Fault-finding procedures weren't implemented prior.
    • Reviewed and updated Emergency recovery procedures.
    • Enhanced planning, risk assessment, and task evaluation.
    • Implemented regular training in emergency recovery scenarios using the FRC.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    IMCA Safety Flash: Finger Injury During ROV Recovery (PDF)

    More Like This

    Untitled Quiz
    6 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    AdoredHealing avatar
    AdoredHealing
    Untitled Quiz
    37 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    WellReceivedSquirrel7948 avatar
    WellReceivedSquirrel7948
    Untitled Quiz
    18 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    RighteousIguana avatar
    RighteousIguana
    Untitled Quiz
    48 questions

    Untitled Quiz

    StraightforwardStatueOfLiberty avatar
    StraightforwardStatueOfLiberty
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser