Podcast
Questions and Answers
What does the statement ∀ x ¬Likes(x, Parsnips) imply?
What does the statement ∀ x ¬Likes(x, Parsnips) imply?
- At least someone likes parsnips.
- No one likes parsnips. (correct)
- There exists at least one person who dislikes parsnips.
- Everyone likes parsnips.
What does ¬∃ x Likes(x, Parsnips) mean?
What does ¬∃ x Likes(x, Parsnips) mean?
- It is not the case that anyone likes parsnips. (correct)
- At least one person likes parsnips.
- Everyone dislikes parsnips.
- Everyone likes parsnips.
How would you interpret ∃ y (∀ x Loves(x, y))?
How would you interpret ∃ y (∀ x Loves(x, y))?
- There is at least one person who is loved by everyone. (correct)
- Everyone loves someone.
- Some people are loved by some others.
- Every person loves many others.
Which of the following statements is equivalent to ¬∀ x Likes(x, IceCream)?
Which of the following statements is equivalent to ¬∀ x Likes(x, IceCream)?
What property does the statement ∀ x (∃ y Loves(x, y)) describe?
What property does the statement ∀ x (∃ y Loves(x, y)) describe?
What property of equality states that for any element x, x is equal to itself?
What property of equality states that for any element x, x is equal to itself?
Which rule allows for the replacement of a term in a clause with another equal term?
Which rule allows for the replacement of a term in a clause with another equal term?
Which of the following statements is an example of a valid logical representation for the relation 'Horses, cows, and pigs are mammals'?
Which of the following statements is an example of a valid logical representation for the relation 'Horses, cows, and pigs are mammals'?
In the context of equality, what does the transitive property imply?
In the context of equality, what does the transitive property imply?
When performing existential instantiation, which of the following statements is NOT a legitimate result?
When performing existential instantiation, which of the following statements is NOT a legitimate result?
What is the purpose of substitution in first-order logic?
What is the purpose of substitution in first-order logic?
Which of the following logical expressions correctly defines the relationship between offspring and parent as inverse relations?
Which of the following logical expressions correctly defines the relationship between offspring and parent as inverse relations?
Which of the following predicates is NOT an example of a logical formulation related to equality?
Which of the following predicates is NOT an example of a logical formulation related to equality?
What can be derived from the knowledge base given the statement ¬P1,2?
What can be derived from the knowledge base given the statement ¬P1,2?
Which of the following statements accurately represents the knowledge that the agent is in square [1,1] and it is safe?
Which of the following statements accurately represents the knowledge that the agent is in square [1,1] and it is safe?
What can we conclude if the agent perceives a breeze in a room, indicated as Bx,y being true?
What can we conclude if the agent perceives a breeze in a room, indicated as Bx,y being true?
What is the implication of the statement (WumpusAhead ∧ WumpusAlive) ⇒ Shoot when WumpusAhead is false?
What is the implication of the statement (WumpusAhead ∧ WumpusAlive) ⇒ Shoot when WumpusAhead is false?
When using And-Elimination, which statement can be inferred from (WumpusAhead ∧ WumpusAlive)?
When using And-Elimination, which statement can be inferred from (WumpusAhead ∧ WumpusAlive)?
What can be derived if we know ¬W2,3 is true, meaning there is no wumpus in square [2,3]?
What can be derived if we know ¬W2,3 is true, meaning there is no wumpus in square [2,3]?
Which of the following accurately describes the role of negations in the agent's knowledge base?
Which of the following accurately describes the role of negations in the agent's knowledge base?
What is the effect of knowing that there is a stench in square [x,y]?
What is the effect of knowing that there is a stench in square [x,y]?
Flashcards
Nested Quantifiers
Nested Quantifiers
The placement of quantifiers within logical statements can affect meaning.
Symmetric Relationship
Symmetric Relationship
A relationship where if A is related to B, then B is related to A.
De Morgan's Rules
De Morgan's Rules
Logical equivalences that relate conjunctions and disjunctions with negations.
Existential Quantifier (∃)
Existential Quantifier (∃)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Universal Quantifier (∀)
Universal Quantifier (∀)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Axiomatize Equality
Axiomatize Equality
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reflexive Property
Reflexive Property
Signup and view all the flashcards
Symmetric Property
Symmetric Property
Signup and view all the flashcards
Transitive Property
Transitive Property
Signup and view all the flashcards
Substitution in Predicates
Substitution in Predicates
Signup and view all the flashcards
Demodulation
Demodulation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Existential Instantiation
Existential Instantiation
Signup and view all the flashcards
First Order Logic (FOL)
First Order Logic (FOL)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wumpus World
Wumpus World
Signup and view all the flashcards
Agent's Initial Knowledge Base
Agent's Initial Knowledge Base
Signup and view all the flashcards
Percept
Percept
Signup and view all the flashcards
Propositional Logic
Propositional Logic
Signup and view all the flashcards
Modus Ponens
Modus Ponens
Signup and view all the flashcards
And-Elimination
And-Elimination
Signup and view all the flashcards
Pit Location Symbol
Pit Location Symbol
Signup and view all the flashcards
Wumpus Location Symbol
Wumpus Location Symbol
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Equality
- Axiomatizing equality involves defining sentences about the equality relation in a knowledge base.
- Equality is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.
- Equals can be substituted for equals in predicates and functions.
- ∀x x = x (Equality is reflexive)
- ∀x, y x = y ⇒ y = x (Equality is symmetric)
- ∀x, y, z (x = y ∧ y = z) ⇒ x = z (Equality is transitive)
Demodulation
- Demodulation is a more efficient way to handle equality.
- It uses inference rules instead of axioms.
- A demodulation rule takes an equality clause (x = y) and a clause, and substitutes y for x.
- The substitution happens if the term in the clause unifies with x.
- The substitution is unidirectional; only x gets replaced by y.
Father/PaternalGrandfather
- Birthdate(Father(Father(Bella)), 1926) ⇒ Birthdate(PaternalGrandfather(Bella), 1926) can be concluded via demodulation.
First Order Logic (FOL)
- Horses, cows and pigs are mammals.
- An offspring of a horse is a horse.
- Bluebeard is a horse.
- Bluebeard is Charlie's parent.
- Offspring and parent relations are inverse.
Existential Instantiation
- If a knowledge base has ∃ x AsHighAs(x, Everest), possible legitimate results of Existential Instantiation are:
- AsHighAs(Everest, Everest)
- AsHighAs(Kilimanjaro, Everest).
- AsHighAs(Kilimanjaro, Everest) ^ AsHighAs(BenNevis, Everest). However, the last one introduces new variables and thus is unsound
Knowledge Base
- A knowledge base (KB) is a set of sentences expressed in a knowledge representation language.
- Sentences represent assertions about the world.
- Axioms are sentences taken as given without derivation.
Operations (Knowledge Base)
- TELL adds sentences to the KB
- ASK queries the KB
- Both may involve inference to derive new sentences from existing ones.
Wumpus World
- A cave with rooms connected by passageways.
- Contains a wumpus, pits and an agent.
- The agent can perceive breeze and stench.
Inference and Proofs
- Modus Ponens (modus ponens): If a → b and a are given, then b can be inferred.
- And-Elimination: From a ^ b , a or b can me inferred.
Nested Quantifiers
- ∀ x ∀ y Brother(x, y) ⇒ Sibling(x, y) (Brothers are siblings)
- ∀ x, y Sibling(x, y) ⇒ Sibling (y, x).(siblinghood is symmetric)
- "Everyone loves someone." – ∀x∃y Loves(x, y).
- “There is someone who is loved by everyone.” – ∃y∀ x Loves(x, y).
- "Everybody loves somebody" means that for every person there is someone they love.
De Morgan Rules
- ¬∀x P = ∃x ¬P
- ¬∃x P = ∀x ¬P
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.