19 Questions
First-degree price discrimination refers to a situation where consumers have identical demands for a particular product.
True
In first-degree price discrimination, a two-part tariff is set to extract all consumer surplus.
False
Second-degree price discrimination involves the firm identifying individual consumers to discriminate directly.
False
Third-degree price discrimination occurs when a firm charges the same price to all groups of consumers.
False
Higher prices are typically charged to groups with a higher price elasticity of demand in third-degree price discrimination.
False
Price discrimination is legal under the Robinson-Patman Act.
False
The Robinson-Patman Act is primarily used to enhance economic efficiency in the market.
False
In North America, local telephone service is an example of first-degree price discrimination.
False
Buying donuts by the dozen is an example of second-degree price discrimination.
True
Paying $20 for lunch and $40 for the same meal at dinner is an example of third-degree price discrimination.
True
Linear pricing always results in consumer surplus being maximized.
False
Price discrimination aims to increase consumer welfare by offering discounts to all consumers.
False
If a firm offers a lower price for purchasing quantities greater than a certain threshold, it is an example of first-degree price discrimination.
False
First-degree price discrimination involves selling the same good at different prices, adjusted for differences in costs.
False
Second-degree price discrimination occurs when a firm sets different prices in each submarket based on geographic location.
False
Third-degree price discrimination is often called price discrimination because marginal prices paid by different consumers differ.
True
Antitrust treatment of price discrimination focuses on preventing any form of price differentiation in the market to protect consumers.
False
Market segmentation based on customer characteristics, such as offering student discounts, is an example of second-degree price discrimination.
True
Capturing more surplus triangles through non-linear price strategies is a common goal in first-degree price discrimination.
False
Test your understanding of first-degree price discrimination where a firm prices to extract all surplus from consumers with identical demand. Explore scenarios with two-part tariffs and constant marginal costs.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free