Evidence in Trials

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

What is the primary goal of a trial in an adversarial system?

  • To establish the ultimate truth of past events
  • To determine the most acceptable probability of what occurred (correct)
  • To punish the accused
  • To prove the innocence of the defendant

What is the role of the parties in an adversarial trial?

  • To decide what evidence to present and what to prevent from being presented (correct)
  • To present evidence in a neutral and impartial manner
  • To persuade the judge to make a decision
  • To work together to find the truth

What is the purpose of evidence in a trial?

  • To establish the ultimate truth of past events
  • To persuade the jury to make a decision
  • To change a fact-finder's belief with respect to a factual proposition (correct)
  • To prove the innocence of the defendant

What is the difference between an open question and a leading question?

<p>An open question does not suggest an answer, while a leading question pushes someone to give a specific answer (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of the judge in relation to evidence and questions?

<p>To decide what is an acceptable leading question and what is not (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary consideration when deciding whether to introduce evidence at a trial?

<p>Whether the evidence can be considered at the trial (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the three specific issues revolving around the general questions of excluding evidence from trial?

<p>Relevance, admissibility, and weight (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is direct evidence?

<p>Evidence that determines a fact in issue without further inference (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a collateral fact?

<p>A fact which proof may be permitted but which does not constitute a fact in issue (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of the trier of law in a trial?

<p>To decide the law applicable to the case (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is there a general ban on hearsay evidence in jury trials?

<p>Due to lack of trust in the jury's ability to discern hearsay evidence (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of the 'voir dire' process?

<p>To hear evidence about the admissibility of evidence (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the legal burden of proof?

<p>The burden of proving facts to the trier of fact (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the evidential burden of proof?

<p>The burden of raising an issue for the trier of fact to answer (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the Woolmington v DPP case?

<p>It established the presumption of innocence (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of exclusionary rules in evidence law?

<p>To exclude certain kinds of evidence and in certain contexts (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the common law exception where the burden of proof is placed on the defendant?

<p>Insanity (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is the burden of proof placed on the defendant in insanity cases?

<p>Because the defendant is best placed to know about their state of insanity (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the issue with placing the burden of proof on the defendant in certain cases?

<p>It infringes on the presumption of innocence (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the approach taken by the House of Lords in cases challenging specific statutory reverse burdens?

<p>To consider whether the reversal is an infringement of the presumption of innocence and whether it's objectively justified (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the outcome of the case R v Lambert?

<p>The House of Lords read down the statute to impose an evidential burden only (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the issue in the case of R v Johnstone?

<p>The defendant was charged under the Trademarks Act (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the outcome of the case Sheldrake v DPP?

<p>The House of Lords interpreted the statute to impose an evidential burden only (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the general principle in criminal law that is relevant to these cases?

<p>The presumption of innocence (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the relevance of Article 6(2) ECHR to these cases?

<p>It enshrines the presumption of innocence (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the effect of reversing the burden of proof in certain cases?

<p>It infringes on the presumption of innocence (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the general rule regarding the burden of proof in relation to implied statutory exceptions?

<p>The burden of proof falls on the defendant (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In R v Hunt, what was the issue that the court had to decide?

<p>Who had the legal burden of proof regarding the percentage of morphine (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the standard of proof required in criminal cases?

<p>Beyond a reasonable doubt (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of examination in chief?

<p>To adduce evidence from one's own witness (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the key rule regarding examination in chief?

<p>NO leading questions (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the difference between a hostile witness and an unfavourable witness?

<p>A hostile witness is one who does not want to tell the truth, while an unfavourable witness is one who is not helpful to your case (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the role of the judge in the adversarial system?

<p>To act as a neutral referee and ensure a fair trial (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of cross-examination?

<p>To challenge the opposing party's witness and test their credibility (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the exception to the rule of no leading questions in examination in chief?

<p>When dealing with introductory or uncontentious matter (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the burden of proof in cases where the burden is reversed?

<p>Balance of probabilities (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of cross-examination in a trial?

<p>To elicit evidence or discredit a witness (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a key difference between examination in chief and cross-examination?

<p>The ability to ask leading questions (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the rule in Browne v Dunn?

<p>A party must be cross-examined on conflicting evidence (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the 'collateral-finality rule'?

<p>A witness's statements on collateral matters are final (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is cross-examination considered a core method of attaining truth in a trial?

<p>Because it is seen as a way to elicit evidence and discredit a witness (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of limiting the scope of cross-examination?

<p>To prevent lengthy and irrelevant examination (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A trial is an objective inquiry into past events.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Evidence can only be in the form of oral testimony.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The primary goal of a trial is to establish the ultimate truth of past events.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The judge decides what evidence is acceptable and what is not.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Leading questions are allowed in examination in chief.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The prosecution and defense work together to present evidence in a trial.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cross-examination, witnesses can only be asked open questions.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The 'collateral-finality rule' states that a witness's statements on collateral matters can be rebutted with evidence.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The primary goal of a trial is to establish the ultimate truth of past events.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In cross-examination, the scope of questioning is unlimited.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A hostile witness is always a witness who is lying.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Cross-examination is a core method of attaining truth in a trial.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The legal burden of proof is generally on the prosecution in criminal cases.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The standard of proof in criminal cases is balance of probabilities.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In R v Hunt, the court ruled that the burden of proof was on the defendant.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The evidential burden always rests with the prosecution.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The judge can examine witnesses in a trial.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Leading questions are allowed in cross-examination.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The standard of proof is the same for both civil and criminal cases.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A hostile witness is one who is not helpful for your case.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

At common law, the defence of insanity places the burden on the prosecution to prove that the defendant is sane.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

There is no distinction between examination in chief and cross-examination.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The prosecution retains the legal burden to prove the defendant's guilt in all cases.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Human Rights Act 1998 allows for statutory exceptions to the presumption of innocence.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case of R v Lambert involved a drug offence where the defendant had to prove they did not know they were in possession of a controlled substance.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The approach in R v Lambert was adopted in subsequent Court of Appeal decisions, including R v Johnstone.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Sheldrake v DPP, the defendant was convicted of being in charge of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Lord Bingham regarded the burden on the defendant as beyond reasonable limits in Sheldrake v DPP.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The burden of proof in insanity cases is placed on the prosecution.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The presumption of sanity exists in criminal law, meaning that defendants are presumed sane unless proven otherwise.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The House of Lords' approach in R v Lambert involves three steps: establishing infringement, justification, and reading down legislation.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Article 6(2) ECHR is relevant to cases involving the reversal of the burden of proof.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case of R v Johnstone involved a trademark infringement.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Circumstantial evidence can directly prove a fact in issue.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Testimonial evidence is always oral evidence.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A fact in issue is a fact that the defense must prove in criminal proceedings.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Real evidence can be inspected.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The credibility of a witness is a fact in issue.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The judge decides the law and the facts in a trial.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The burden of proof is always on the prosecution in criminal cases.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The prosecution has the evidential burden of proving their case from the start of the trial.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The defense has the legal burden of proving their case in criminal cases.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The presumption of innocence is a fundamental principle of English criminal law.

<p>True (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying

Study Notes

Evidence and Burden of Proof

  • Evidence is any material that has the potential to change a fact-finder's belief with respect to any factual proposition that is in dispute and to be decided.
  • Evidence can be in many forms, including oral, written, and documentary.
  • Types of evidence:
    • Direct evidence: determines a fact in issue without further inference.
    • Circumstantial evidence: requires inferences to be made.
    • Testimonial evidence: oral evidence, such as witness statements in court.
    • Real evidence: actual things to be examined, such as physical objects, documents, and the demeanour of the witness.

Adversarial System

  • Trials in this country are not objective inquiries into past events, but rather adversarial contests between prosecution and defence.
  • It is the party's decision to decide what evidence they wish to present or wish to prevent from being presented.
  • The goal is to present evidence in the most persuasive way to win the sympathy of the court for their side and position.

Questioning Witnesses

  • Two kinds of examination:
    • Examination in chief: examining your own witness to adduce evidence.
    • Cross-examination: questioning the other party's witness or hostile witness to elicit evidence or discredit their evidence.
  • Rules for questioning:
    • No leading questions in examination in chief.
    • Leading questions are allowed in cross-examination.
    • Exceptions to leading questions include introductory or uncontentious matters, complex subject matter, and hostile witnesses.

Hostile Witnesses

  • A hostile witness is one that does not want to tell the truth.
  • Determining hostility is a question of law, based on factors such as demeanour, inconsistency in statements, and providing legitimate explanations.
  • A hostile witness can be cross-examined.

Cross-Examination

  • Aim is to elicit evidence or discredit evidence from the witness.
  • Limits on scope of cross-examination:
    • Lengthy and irrelevant examination are restricted.
    • Questions on creditworthiness must relate to facts in issue.
    • Rule in Browne v Dunn: a party must cross-examine on conflicting evidence.
    • Collateral-finality rule: witness statements on collateral matters are final.

Burden of Proof

  • Legal burden: discharged by proving facts to the trier of fact (i.e. the jury).
  • Evidential burden: discharged by raising an issue for the trier of fact to answer.
  • General rule: the party with the legal burden has the evidential burden, but with some exceptions.
  • Woolmington v DPP: 'it is the duty of the prosecution to prove the prisoner's guilt'.

Standard of Proof

  • Criminal standard of proof: beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • Key phrases:
    • 'if the evidence is so strong...as to leave only a remote possibility in D's favour which can be dismissed with the sentence "of course it is possible, but not in the least probable", the case is proved beyond a reasonable doubt'.
    • 'completely satisfied, sure'.
    • 'sure as if making important life choices'.

Procedure

  • Judge's role: deciding on the admissibility of evidence, directing the jury, and making decisions on the fairness of the trial.
  • Jury's role: deciding on the facts of the case.
  • 'Voire dire': a trial within a trial, where the judge hears evidence about whether evidence should be admitted.

Exclusionary Rules

  • Law of evidence focuses on admissibility, not how factual decisions are made.
  • Rules and doctrines operate to exclude certain kinds of evidence in certain contexts.
  • Judge's discretion: excluding evidence on the basis of probative value and prejudicial value, or in the interests of fairness.### Cross-Examination
  • Refusing to answer questions or saying "I don't remember" is a reason to suspect a hostile witness
  • Inconsistencies in statements, whether direct contradictions or not, can also indicate a hostile witness
  • The court decides whether a witness is hostile based on these reasons
  • A hostile witness can be cross-examined to elicit evidence or discredit their testimony

Key Differences in Cross-Examination

  • Can ask leading questions
  • Can ask questions to discredit the witness's credibility

Limits of Cross-Examination

  • Lengthy and irrelevant examination are restricted
  • Questions about creditworthiness must relate to facts in issue, not remote issues
  • Rule in Browne v Dunn: a party must cross-examine a witness on conflicting evidence if they wish to reject their testimony
  • Collateral-finality rule: witness statements on collateral matters are final, but statements on facts in issue can be rebutted with evidence

Implied Statutory Exceptions

  • Implied exceptions can be found where the defendant relies on exceptions, exemptions, provisos, or qualifications
  • Legal burden of proof falls on the defendant in such cases
  • Example: R v Hunt, where the defendant relied on the Misuse of Drugs Regulations to defend against a drug offense charge

Evidential Burden

  • Generally rests with whoever has the legal burden (usually the prosecution)
  • Exceptions include general defenses like public/private defense, duress, and automatism, where the defendant has the evidential burden to raise sufficient evidence

Standard of Proof

  • Burden refers to who needs to prove, while standard refers to how they need to prove
  • Criminal standard of proof is beyond a reasonable doubt
  • Examples of satisfied standards: completely satisfied, sure, as if making important life choices

Witness Examination

  • Adversarial system: judge does not examine witnesses
  • Two types of examination: examination in chief (and re-examination) and cross-examination
  • Rules for examination in chief: no leading questions, except in certain circumstances (introductory/uncontentious matters, complex subject matter, witness identification)
  • Hostile witnesses: different from unfavorable witnesses; determined by factors like demeanor and refusal to answer questions; can be cross-examined

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Criminal Law: Evidence and Proof
140 questions
Criminal Law and Evidence Overview
64 questions
Criminal Law and Evidence Quiz
79 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser