Evidence-Based Practice in Physical Therapy Midterm
48 Questions
4 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

A researcher aims to synthesize findings from several primary studies focusing on the efficacy of aquatic therapy for chronic lower back pain. Which resource would be MOST appropriate for this endeavor, considering its specialized collection and synthesis of evidence?

  • Cochrane Library (correct)
  • PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database)
  • AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)
  • APTA (American Physical Therapy Association)
  • A physical therapist seeks to rapidly identify high-quality, bias-assessed evidence regarding manual therapy techniques for carpal tunnel syndrome. Furthermore, they require the ability to construct a PICO-formatted search. Which database optimally fulfills these requirements?

  • TRIP Database (correct)
  • PubMed via MeSH terms
  • AHRQ
  • PEDro
  • The TRIP Database stands out as it not only helps clinicians find relevant research rapidly and assesses bias using AI but also supports PICO searches, catering directly to the therapist's outlined needs.
  • An experienced clinician wants to quickly locate recommendations developed by leading experts for the management of knee osteoarthritis. Given the need for readily applicable guidance, which resource would be MOST suitable for direct access to such information?

  • Cochrane Library
  • APTA (American Physical Therapy Association) (correct)
  • PEDro (Physiotherapy Evidence Database)
  • AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)
  • A researcher examines a cohort of patients with spinal cord injuries over a 10-year period to understand the progression of their functional independence. Classify the study design that best describes this approach.

    <p>Longitudinal descriptive research (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A research team is investigating whether a novel virtual reality-based rehabilitation program directly influences balance outcomes in stroke survivors. Based on the research aim, what type of research design is MOST appropriate?

    <p>Causal research (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A physical therapist observes a patient struggling to independently manage household chores due to impaired upper extremity strength following a stroke. How should this limitation be classified, according to the provided conceptual framework?

    <p>Participation restriction (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A clinical researcher aims to comprehensively synthesize the existing evidence on the effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for improving gait speed in individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). Given the objective, what is the MOST appropriate initial strategy for efficiently locating relevant studies in PubMed?

    <p>Using the MeSH database in PubMed to identify controlled vocabulary terms for NMES, gait speed, and MS, then combining those terms with boolean operators (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A clinician is searching for evidence-based interventions to improve balance in elderly patients with a history of falls. After identifying a few key articles, they want to broaden their search to capture any relevant studies that might have used different terminology. What strategy would be MOST effective for achieving this?

    <p>Using synonyms for the original search terms (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of clinical research, which of the following best illustrates the nuanced relationship between statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness?

    <p>A study demonstrating a statistically significant reduction in blood pressure may still lack clinical meaningfulness if the reduction does not translate into a tangible decrease in cardiovascular events or improved quality of life for patients. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A pharmaceutical company is conducting a phase III clinical trial for a novel analgesic. Interim analysis reveals a statistically significant difference in pain reduction between the treatment and placebo groups (p < 0.01); however, a small subset of patients in the treatment arm experienced severe, unexpected adverse events. Which of the following considerations should most critically inform the decision to proceed with or halt the trial?

    <p>A comprehensive risk-benefit analysis, carefully weighing the magnitude of pain reduction against the severity and incidence of adverse events, particularly within clinically relevant patient subgroups, should be prioritized. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A researcher aims to investigate the impact of a novel cognitive training program on working memory capacity in healthy adults. To mitigate the risk of Type II error, which of the following strategies would be most effective?

    <p>Conduct a comprehensive power analysis to determine the minimum sample size required to detect a clinically meaningful effect, and ensure adequate participant recruitment. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A study examining the efficacy of a new drug for treating hypertension reports a statistically significant reduction in systolic blood pressure compared to placebo. However, the study population consisted exclusively of elderly Caucasian males with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. What critical consideration must be addressed when extrapolating these findings to the general population?

    <p>Caution should be exercised when generalizing these findings due to the limited demographic representation of the study population, necessitating further research in more diverse cohorts. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A clinical trial utilizes a paired samples t-test to assess the effectiveness of a novel rehabilitation intervention on motor function in stroke patients. What specific assumption underlies the appropriate application of this statistical test?

    <p>The differences between the paired observations (pre- and post-intervention) are approximately normally distributed. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a study comparing three different surgical techniques for correcting scoliosis, ANOVA is employed to analyze the differences in post-operative Cobb angle measurements among the treatment groups. What critical assumption must be met to ensure the validity of the ANOVA results?

    <p>The Cobb angle measurements within each surgical technique group should be approximately normally distributed, and the variances should be relatively equal across the groups. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A research team investigates the relationship between serum cholesterol levels and the incidence of myocardial infarction using linear regression analysis. The analysis reveals a statistically significant positive correlation (p < 0.05). However, subsequent analysis reveals the presence of several confounding variables, including age, smoking status, and family history of heart disease. How should the researchers address these confounding variables to obtain a more accurate estimate of the true relationship between cholesterol and myocardial infarction?

    <p>Employ a multiple linear regression model that includes the confounding variables as covariates to statistically control for their effects. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A marketing firm seeks to predict customer churn (i.e., whether a customer will discontinue their service) based on various predictor variables, including customer demographics, usage patterns, and satisfaction scores. Which statistical method would be most appropriate for this predictive modeling task?

    <p>Binary logistic regression (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Within the framework of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), how does the interaction between scientific research, clinical expertise, and patient values MOST critically influence the therapeutic trajectory?

    <p>The convergence of these three elements fosters a shared informed decision-making process, wherein the weighting of each component is dynamically adjusted based on the patient's evolving clinical presentation and contextual factors. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Assuming a scenario where a novel therapeutic intervention demonstrates statistically significant efficacy in a randomized controlled trial, yet conflicts with a patient's deeply held cultural beliefs, what is the MOST ethically justifiable course of action within the EBP framework?

    <p>Engage in a collaborative discourse with the patient, exploring the underlying values informing their beliefs, and collaboratively adapt the evidence-based intervention to mitigate potential conflicts, or explore alternative evidence-based options. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Given the inherent limitations in generalizing group-level research findings to individual patients, what advanced statistical or methodological approach could BEST mitigate this challenge within the context of EBP?

    <p>Utilizing Bayesian statistical modeling to incorporate prior beliefs and individual patient data, allowing for personalized probability estimates of treatment outcomes. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a scenario where a clinician identifies a critical gap in the existing research literature relevant to a specific patient population, what proactive measure could the clinician undertake to address this deficiency and contribute to the advancement of EBP?

    <p>Collaborate with a research institution to design and conduct a rigorous clinical trial addressing the knowledge gap, ensuring appropriate ethical oversight and data analysis. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How would you describe the MOST effective method a clinician could employ to continually refine their search and appraisal skills, thus enhancing their proficiency in Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)?

    <p>Participating in interdisciplinary journal clubs that critically evaluate research methodologies, statistical analyses, and clinical implications, promoting a culture of continuous learning and knowledge sharing. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    When appraising a research article, which of the following considerations would hold the MOST significance in determining its applicability and rigor for informing clinical decision-making?

    <p>The study's design, methodology, and analysis, ensuring alignment with the research question and minimizing potential biases, alongside the relevance of the patient population to the clinician's practice. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    During a shared informed decision-making process, a patient expresses skepticism regarding the potential risks associated with an evidence-based intervention. What is the MOST appropriate course of action for the clinician?

    <p>Respectfully acknowledge the patient's concerns, providing transparent and unbiased information about the potential risks and benefits, and exploring alternative evidence-based options aligned with their values. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What advanced strategies could a healthcare organization implement to foster a sustained culture of EBP among its clinical staff, addressing the identified barriers of time constraints and limited research skills?

    <p>Establishing dedicated EBP mentorship programs, facilitating protected time for research activities, and providing access to biostatisticians and research methodologists to support clinical inquiry. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the nuanced landscape of clinical research, what critical assumption underlies the application of Cronbach's alpha when evaluating the inter-relatedness of multiple outcome variables?

    <p>The outcome variables are related to each other but not so strongly that they are essentially measuring the same construct, indicating a balance between relevance and redundancy. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A researcher observes a statistically significant, yet seemingly negligible, improvement in a patient-reported outcome measure following an intervention. Which critical consideration should take precedence in interpreting this finding within a clinical context?

    <p>The researcher must evaluate the effect's magnitude, assessing whether the observed change meets or exceeds the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) relevant to the patient population. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a longitudinal study evaluating the effectiveness of a novel rehabilitation protocol, a substantial within-group change is observed in the treatment arm. What confounding factors must be meticulously accounted for to accurately isolate the true treatment effect?

    <p>Natural history, regression to the mean, nonspecific effects (e.g., placebo), and any co-interventions received during the study period. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A clinical trial investigating a new pharmacological intervention for chronic pain exhibits a significantly lower-than-anticipated enrollment rate. What potential biases could arise from this recruitment challenge, and how might these biases impact the generalizability of the study findings?

    <p>Selection bias, where the recruited sample may not be representative of the target population, limiting the external validity and applicability of the results. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A physical therapist seeks to evaluate the efficacy of a novel intervention for improving balance in elderly patients with a history of falls. Which methodological approach would provide the most robust assessment of treatment effect while minimizing potential biases inherent in clinical practice?

    <p>Employing a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria, blinded outcome assessment, and intention-to-treat analysis to mitigate confounding variables and selection bias. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of outcome measures, differentiate between internal consistency and test-retest reliability, articulating their unique contributions to establishing the overall reliability of a measurement instrument.

    <p>Internal consistency evaluates the consistency of results across items within the same test administered at a single point in time, while test-retest reliability assesses the stability of scores when the same test is administered to the same individual on separate occasions. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Elaborate on the critical distinctions between intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, emphasizing the specific sources of variability that each type of reliability aims to quantify within the context of clinical measurements.

    <p>Intra-rater reliability quantifies the consistency of scores obtained by a single rater administering the same measurement to the same subject on multiple occasions, whereas inter-rater reliability assesses the agreement between scores obtained by different raters measuring the same subject. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A researcher develops a novel outcome measure designed to assess the psychosocial impact of chronic pain on patients' daily lives. What multifaceted validation strategy should be implemented to comprehensively evaluate the outcome measure's ability to accurately and meaningfully capture the intended construct?

    <p>Employing a combination of content validation, criterion validation, and construct validation techniques, including expert review, correlation with established measures, and factor analysis, to provide a comprehensive assessment of the outcome measure's validity. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a clinical trial comparing a novel therapeutic intervention against standard care for reducing post-operative delirium, the primary outcome is the incidence of delirium within 72 hours post-surgery. After conducting an intention-to-treat analysis, the p-value is determined to be 0.04, with an alpha level set at 0.05. However, a post-hoc sensitivity analysis, excluding patients with protocol deviations, yields a p-value of 0.06. Concurrently, the calculated Cohen's d is 0.35 and the NNT is 12. How should the trial's results be interpreted considering the totality of the statistical evidence?

    <p>The results remain inconclusive; although the ITT analysis suggests statistical significance at $\alpha = 0.05$, the loss of significance in the sensitivity analysis, combined with the small effect size, diminishes confidence in the intervention's true effect. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigates the effectiveness of a new rehabilitation protocol for patients post-stroke. Assessors were blinded to group allocation, but therapists delivering the intervention were not. The primary outcome is the change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score at 6 weeks. The control group receives standard care. What potential bias is MOST significantly introduced in this design?

    <p>Performance bias, as the unblinded therapists may consciously or unconsciously provide differential treatment affecting patient performance and outcomes. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A study compares two surgical techniques for repairing rotator cuff tears, with the primary outcome being the Constant-Murley score at 12 months post-operation. Technique A has a mean score of 80 (SD = 10), while Technique B has a mean score of 75 (SD = 12). A t-test yields a p-value of 0.06. The authors claim Technique A is superior based on the higher mean score. Which of the following statements BEST critiques the authors' conclusion, based on the principles of statistical and clinical significance?

    <p>The authors' conclusion is premature; while statistical significance is not met, the potential clinical relevance should be further explored, considering the magnitude of the difference and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Constant-Murley score. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Researchers conduct a study comparing three different exercise protocols (A, B, and C) for improving quadriceps strength in patients with knee osteoarthritis. An ANOVA is used to analyze the data, and the resulting p-value is 0.03. What is the MOST appropriate next step in analyzing the data?

    <p>Perform post-hoc tests (e.g., Tukey's HSD or Bonferroni correction) to determine which specific pairs of exercise protocols differ significantly from each other. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a prospective cohort study examining the impact of a novel biomarker on predicting the incidence of cardiovascular events, researchers analyze data from a large population over a 10-year period. The analysis reveals a statistically significant association between elevated biomarker levels and increased risk of cardiovascular events (p < 0.001). However, the calculated effect size (Cohen's d) is 0.15. How should these findings be interpreted in the context of clinical decision-making and public health implications?

    <p>Despite the statistical significance, the small effect size raises concerns about the practical utility of the biomarker, suggesting limited incremental value in improving cardiovascular risk prediction beyond existing clinical parameters. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A clinical trial is designed to assess the efficacy of a new drug for reducing chronic pain. Participants are randomly assigned to either the treatment group (receiving the new drug) or the control group (receiving a placebo). To minimize bias, assessors are blinded to the treatment allocation. However, due to logistical constraints, it is not possible to blind the participants or the therapists administering the drug. Which of the following types of bias is MOST likely to affect the results of this trial?

    <p>Performance bias, due to the lack of blinding of participants and therapists, which may influence the care provided and the participants' responses. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a study examining the effectiveness of a novel physical therapy intervention for improving balance in elderly patients, the primary outcome is measured using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the BBS in this population is determined to be 4 points. After analyzing the data, the mean difference in BBS scores between the intervention and control groups is 3 points, with a p-value of 0.04. How should the results of this study be interpreted, considering both statistical and clinical significance?

    <p>The intervention is statistically significant but not clinically significant, as the p-value is less than 0.05 but the mean difference does not meet the MCID. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A researcher is analyzing nominal data from a survey regarding patient satisfaction with different aspects of a hospital stay (e.g., nursing care, physician care, food services). Which statistical test is MOST appropriate for determining if there is a significant association between patient satisfaction levels and the different aspects of the hospital stay?

    <p>Chi-Square (X²) (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Within the context of psychometric evaluation, under what specific circumstance is it MOST appropriate to designate the variation in scores between two distinct cohorts as an 'effect,' and what underlying assumption MUST be rigorously satisfied to justify such a designation?

    <p>Exclusively when a randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrates a statistically significant divergence post-intervention, presupposing the absence of baseline confounders and the integrity of blinding protocols. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of evaluating a novel assessment tool for social anxiety, what nuanced strategy BEST exemplifies the concurrent establishment of both convergent and discriminant validity within a heterogeneous sample exhibiting comorbid depressive symptoms and substance use disorders?

    <p>Employing a multi-trait, multi-method matrix that juxtaposes correlations between the new measure and established anxiety scales (e.g., Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) alongside correlations with measures of unrelated constructs (e.g., cognitive function, physical health indicators) to elucidate patterns of convergence and divergence. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A researcher aims to validate a new self-report measure of 'grit' (perseverance and passion for long-term goals) in a cohort of elite marathon runners. If existing measures of grit demonstrate questionable construct validity due to potential confounding with conscientiousness and achievement motivation, which methodological innovation would MOST rigorously address this limitation when establishing criterion validity?

    <p>Conducting a longitudinal predictive validity study correlating baseline scores on the new grit measure with runners' persistence and performance outcomes (e.g., marathon completion time, training consistency) over a multi-year period, while controlling for conscientiousness and prior achievement. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a longitudinal study evaluating the effectiveness of a novel cognitive training program on working memory capacity in older adults, the research team observes a pronounced ceiling effect on several standardized working memory measures. What advanced statistical technique could BEST mitigate the interpretative challenges posed by this ceiling effect and provide a more accurate estimate of the program's impact?

    <p>Employing a Tobit regression model, censoring observed working memory scores at the ceiling value, to estimate the latent, uncensored distribution of working memory capacity and assess treatment effects. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A clinical trial assesses a new intervention for chronic pain management, utilizing a patient-reported outcome measure with established reliability and validity. If the trial yields a statistically significant reduction in pain scores within the treatment group, but the magnitude of change falls substantially below the established Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for that outcome measure, what sophisticated inference should the researchers derive regarding the practical utility of the intervention?

    <p>The intervention may possess statistical efficacy but lacks demonstrated clinical meaningfulness, potentially limiting its adoption in real-world clinical practice due to insufficient tangible benefit for patients. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A psychometrician is tasked with evaluating the responsiveness of a novel instrument designed to measure disease-specific functional status in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Which advanced methodological approach would MOST rigorously determine the instrument's ability to detect clinically meaningful changes in functional status following surgical intervention, while accounting for individual variability in recovery trajectories?

    <p>Utilizing latent growth curve modeling (LGCM) to model individual trajectories of functional recovery over time, then correlating the LGCM-derived growth parameters (e.g., initial status, rate of change) with scores on the novel instrument to assess its sensitivity to change. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of appraising the applicability of a study examining the psychometric properties of a depression scale for use with a geriatric population in a rural setting, what critical factor should the clinician MOST rigorously evaluate to ensure the study's findings are transferable to their specific patient population?

    <p>The representativeness of the study sample concerning cultural and socioeconomic factors, cognitive function, and comorbid conditions prevalent in the clinician's target population. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A researcher is adapting a well-established anxiety inventory for use in a culturally distinct population. After translating the inventory and establishing linguistic equivalence, what rigorous methodological step is MOST crucial to ensure the adapted version retains its construct validity and clinical meaningfulness within the new cultural context?

    <p>Conducting cognitive interviews with members of the target population to assess their comprehension and interpretation of individual items, identifying potential sources of cultural bias or misinterpretation. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Flashcards

    Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)

    A clinical decision-making method integrating scientific research, clinical expertise, and patient values.

    Scientific Research

    Empirical evidence obtained through systematic testing, including clinical and nonclinical research.

    Clinical Expertise

    Knowledge gained from years of patient care and improvement efforts, shared through education and mentorship.

    Patient Values and Circumstances

    A patient's beliefs, preferences, medical history, and environmental factors affecting care.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Shared Informed Decision

    A partnership choice between therapist and patient, informed by the best evidence.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    EBP Process: Identify a question

    First step in EBP; develop a focused, searchable clinical question from patient information.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    EBP Process: Appraise the evidence

    Evaluate the research quality and applicability to guide clinical decisions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Barriers to EBP

    Challenges in utilizing EBP include time constraints, lack of skills, and intimidating stats.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    MeSH terms

    Medical Subject Headings used to narrow searches in PubMed.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    TRIP Database

    A database for clinicians to find research and assess bias using AI.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Systematic Review

    A study synthesizing information from multiple primary studies.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

    Participants are randomly assigned to intervention groups in a study.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs)

    Recommendations developed by experts based on the best evidence.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Descriptive Research

    Research that describes a situation using various designs.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Filters

    Tools in searches that narrow results by criteria like study type.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Impairments

    Problems at the level of body functions and structures.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Null Hypothesis

    The assumption that there is no difference between groups being compared.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    P-value

    The probability that the observed difference between groups is due to chance.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Alpha Level

    The threshold probability for rejecting the null hypothesis, usually set at 0.05.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Confidence Interval (CI)

    A range of values that is likely to contain the true population mean.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    T-test

    A statistical method used to compare the means of two groups.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    ANOVA

    A statistical method used to compare the means of three or more groups.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Effect Size

    A measure of the magnitude of difference between two groups.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Blinding

    The practice of keeping participants unaware of treatment to reduce bias.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Statistical Significance

    When a p-value is less than a threshold, indicating results are unlikely due to chance.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Type I Error

    A false positive; rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Type II Error

    A false negative; accepting the null hypothesis when it is false.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Sample vs. Population

    A sample is a smaller, representative subset of a larger population.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Power Analysis

    Determines the number of participants needed to detect a significant effect.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Clinical Meaningfulness

    The size of a change deemed important from the patient's perspective.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Generalizability

    The extent to which study results can apply to other populations.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Cronbach's Alpha

    A measure of correlation among multiple outcome variables to assess reliability.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Outcome Measure

    A characteristic measured to assess a patient's status, tracking progress over time.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Questionnaire-based Measures

    Outcome measures requiring patients to respond to surveys or interviews.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Performance-based Measures

    Outcome measures that involve patients performing specific tasks or movements.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Psychometric Properties

    Intrinsic qualities of measures including reliability, validity, and clinical meaningfulness.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Reliability

    Consistency of an outcome measure in producing the same score across trials.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Validity

    The ability of an outcome measure to accurately capture what it intends to measure.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Internal Consistency

    A measure of how consistent results are across items in the same test.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Content Validity

    Establishes that a measure includes all aspects of the characteristic it intends to measure.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Face Validity

    Less formal evaluation based on expert opinion that a measure appears to measure what it intends to.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Criterion Validity

    Assesses the validity of a measure by comparing it to a more established measure.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Construct Validity

    Establishes a measure's ability to assess an abstract characteristic or concept.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Convergent Validity

    Performance on a measure aligns with other measures representing the same construct.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Discriminant Validity

    Performance on the measure diverges from those not representing the same construct.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID)

    The smallest change on a measure that is considered meaningful to patients.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Responsiveness

    An outcome measure's ability to detect change over time.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Study Notes

    Week 1

    • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) combines best available scientific research, clinical expertise, and patient values/circumstances for optimal patient care.
    • Scientific research involves testing hypotheses using human, animal, or cell specimens.
    • Clinical expertise is accumulated knowledge, skill, and experience from years of caring for patients, developed through formalized education, mentorship, and reflective practice.
    • Patient values and circumstances include beliefs, preferences, expectations, culture, medical history, access to care, and family circumstances.
    • The EBP process has five steps: identify a question, search for evidence, appraise evidence, integrate evidence, and evaluate outcomes.
    • Barriers to EBP include time constraints, lack of generalizability of research findings to individual patients, lack of research skills and statistical understanding, inadequate information resources, and inconsistent practice of EBP.
    • EBP moves from habit-based to evidence-informed care, enhancing patient confidence and choices.

    Week 2

    • Searchable clinical questions have patient characteristics, intervention, comparison, and outcome elements.
    • Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) can refine searches in databases.
    • Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) are standardized terms for indexing biomedical literature in MEDLINE and PubMed databases.
    • Databases like MEDLINE (PubMed), TRIP, PEDro, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar offer research and clinical evidence for healthcare professionals.
    • Systematic reviews (SRs) summarize and synthesize findings of multiple studies, representing strong evidence.
    • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) randomly assign participants to treatment groups.
    • Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) include evidence-based recommendations.

    Week 3

    • Applicability of research involves if a study's findings are useful for a specific patient or clinical question.
    • Quality of a study describes the rigor and validity of the methods used, ensuring trust in the findings.
    • Evidence-based practice (EBP): is a structured approach to evidence-based practice.
    • Randomization reduces bias by randomly assigning participants to treatment groups.
    • Stratification divides participants based on characteristics to further ensure similar groups for testing.
    • Blinding where participants or researchers are unaware of group assignment minimizes bias.
    • Intention-to-treat analysis maintains original group assignments despite any dropping out or treatment changes

    Week 4

    • Data types include nominal (categories), ordinal (ranked categories), discrete (distinct values), and continuous (any value within a range).
    • Descriptive statistics summarize data (e.g, mean, median, mode, standard deviation).
    • Inferential statistics use probability and samples to draw conclusions about larger populations (e.g., t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square tests).
    • Effect size quantifies the magnitude of a treatment's effect; small, medium, or large effect sizes.
    • Clinical meaningfulness of data is whether the change is meaningful to patients.
    • Sample size and power analysis determine how many participants are needed for a study's validity.

    Week 5

    • Descriptive statistics describe characteristics of samples, not population inferences.
    • Inferential statistics make inferences about populations.
    • Null hypothesis is the assumption of no difference between groups.
    • Alternative hypothesis suggests a difference between groups.
    • P-value quantifies probability of results if the null hypothesis was true.
    • Statistical significance, achieved when p-value is below a threshold (often 0.05).
    • Study design considerations include sample size, randomization, and baseline characteristics.
    • Hypothesis testing involves testing the null hypothesis.
    • T-tests, ANOVAs, correlation, and regression help analyze differences or relationships between groups

    Week 6

    • Outcome measures assess patient status and progress during physical therapy.
    • Outcome measures can be questionnaire-based (e.g., surveys) or performance-based (e.g., physical tasks).
    • Psychometric properties: reliability (consistency), validity (accuracy), and clinical meaningfulness (patient impact) are critical for outcome measures.
    • Minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) determine meaningful change.
    • Clinical meaningfulness assesses the size of a change considered important from the patient perspective.
    • Evaluating change in an outcome measures is different than differences between two or more distinct groups, typically across treatment types.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Midterm Study Guide EBP PDF

    Description

    This quiz explores essential resources and methodologies for evidence-based practice in physical therapy. It covers topics such as synthesizing findings, identifying high-quality evidence, and locating expert recommendations for various conditions. Test your knowledge on optimal strategies for effective clinical research and practice.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser