Topic 2.1: Finding Reliable Sources

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson
Download our mobile app to listen on the go
Get App

Questions and Answers

Which of the following is a characteristic of a trusted source?

  • It contains old information.
  • It is of unknown origin.
  • It is found on any website.
  • It is updated regularly. (correct)

A source is considered more reliable if it aims to sell a product or influence your opinion.

False (B)

What type of source is generally considered more trustworthy: a library database or a personal website?

library database

When evaluating a source, understanding the ___________ in which the information is presented is crucial.

<p>context</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the source type with whether it is 'Trusted' or 'Less Trusted'.

<p>Library database = Trusted Subject expert = Trusted Website = Less Trusted Unknown = Less Trusted</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why is it important to consider the 'who' behind a source when evaluating its reliability?

<p>To assess the source's potential bias or agenda. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the content, it is okay to cite Wikipedia as a primary source for academic assignments.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one reason why the content suggests you cannot directly reference Wikipedia for academic work?

<p>anyone can edit it</p> Signup and view all the answers

When evaluating a source, consider if the authors or publishers have any reason to ___________ you.

<p>mislead</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following questions to the appropriate aspect of source evaluation:

<p>Who wrote this? = Author's Background Why did they write this? = Author's Motivation What do they have to gain? = Potential Bias Are they presenting facts or opinions? = Type of Content</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is a characteristic of 'Ad-Speak'?

<p>Hyperbole (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If information is presented as 'unbelievably good', it is likely an example of objective and reliable reporting.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the potential pitfall of relying on claims that a product is 'very user-friendly' without further scrutiny?

<p>vagueness</p> Signup and view all the answers

When using GenAI for assignments, its output must be ____________ in your own words and cited to reliable sources.

<p>rewritten</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following 'Ad-Speak' strategies with their descriptions:

<p>Emotion = Using emotional appeals to persuade. Hyperbole = Exaggerating claims for effect. Vagueness = Using unclear or undefined terms. Partial information = Presenting only some of the facts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What should a company prioritize when selecting products?

<p>Measurable data (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a source is funded by a non-profit organization, it is guaranteed to be impartial and unbiased.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How can checking the references listed in an article help establish its credibility?

<p>verifies claims</p> Signup and view all the answers

When evaluating a source, determining whether it presents facts or __________ helps assess its objectivity.

<p>opinions</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match each GenAI writing style with its potential issue in academic work:

<p>Hyperbole = Exaggerated claims lacking basis can mislead readers. Vagueness = Unclear language reduces the clarity and precision of information. Uncited information = Absence of citations diminishes credibility and could be plagiarism. Unreliable information = Compromises the integrity of the assignment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

What critical question should you ask yourself when a source claims a product will 'make you happy'?

<p>Is this source trying to emotionally manipulate me? (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If Microsoft's documentation labels their product as easy to use, you should automatically accept this statement as an objective fact.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a key difference between the two explanations about the ease of using Microsoft Word: One citing its user-friendly interface and another detailing specific supporting features?

<p>verifiable information</p> Signup and view all the answers

When comparing products, selecting what will be used in the course should be __________ , so the product selected will be more useful than just the cheapest product.

<p>objective</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following descriptions to the aspect of evaluating Microsoft Word's accessibility:

<p>Widely regarded = Says who? Easiest = Compared to what? Most accessible = How is it the most accessible? User-friendly = For whom?</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the main problem with the statement, 'This is the perfect fit for your company' in advertising?

<p>It lacks specific details. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

A source that primarily uses hyperbole is generally considered a strong, reliable source for academic research.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Why should one be especially cautious when a source avoids presenting uncited information?

<p>diminished credibility</p> Signup and view all the answers

When using GenAI and presented with biased results, you should be held ___________ for what is submitted.

<p>responsible</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following scenarios with the best course of action for assessing source reliability:

<p>Encountering a claim that seems too good to be true = Check for independent verification. Discovering a source funded by a specific industry = Investigate potential conflicts of interest. Reading an article with no listed references = Seek alternative sources with greater transparency. Noticing an article written anonymously = Question lack of accountability.</p> Signup and view all the answers

When a source asserts that a product is 'widely regarded' as the easiest to use, what further question should be asked?

<p>Who is doing the regarding? (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a well-known company publishes a claim, it automatically qualifies as factual and does not require further verification.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

When assessing the accuracy of a source from GenAI, what is one important step to consider even after rewriting in your own words?

<p>cite reliable source</p> Signup and view all the answers

Before trusting information, especially from a lobby group, always ask: Do they have reason to ___________ you?

<p>mislead</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following terms from the 'Is a source reliable?' section with examples:

<p>Impartial information = A study comparing the effectiveness of multiple products Sell something = An advertisement for a new product Influence you = An article claiming for one product being the best Company = Microsoft</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a source is old, what should you consider?

<p>If it has been updated (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

If a product claims to be 'unrivalled', that means nobody will not be saying that.

<p>False (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

When determining the 'who' behind a source, what is something that should be considered?

<p>financial gain</p> Signup and view all the answers

When determining the 'why' behind something, determine if the source is trying to __________ you?

<p>influence</p> Signup and view all the answers

Match the following questions to the appropriate reason for finding trusted sources:

<p>Who wrote this? = Look into their credentials. Why did they write this? = Determine if there is bias. What do they have to gain? = Figure out financial incentives. Are they presenting facts or opinions? = Realize something may be a sales pitch</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Critically Evaluate Sources

Critically evaluating sources means assessing their reliability, context, and potential biases to ensure the information used is trustworthy and appropriate.

Why Library Databases?

Library databases are often more trustworthy because they contain reviewed and updated information from subject experts.

Source Reliability

Understanding why a source was created (its purpose) and who created it (the author or publisher) helps determine its reliability and potential biases.

What is a Trusted Source?

A trusted source is one that is likely impartial, updated, and reviewed by experts.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Referencing Wikipedia

Wikipedia is not typically referenced directly because its content can be edited by anyone, but it's helpful to understand topics and discover reference lists.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Assessing Sources

When assessing sources, consider who wrote it, why they wrote it, what they have to gain, and whether they are presenting facts or opinions.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Ad-Speak

Ad-speak involves using emotional language, hyperbole, vagueness, and partial information to persuade rather than inform.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Verifiable Info

Verifiable information provides specific details and can be checked for accuracy, while opinions reflect personal beliefs without supporting evidence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Hyperbole

The use of hyperbole involves exaggeration.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Vagueness

The use of vagueness involves imprecise statements.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Evaluate the Source

To evaluate a source, consider who is behind the message and if they have reasons to mislead you.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Comparing Options

When comparing options, it’s useful to have objective, measurable, and comparable characteristics.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

  • The topic is Assignments & Sources

Challenge

  • Diagnose a friend with the following symptoms: feeling cold, headache, and nausea.

Key Questions to Consider

  • What is wrong with the person?
  • Are they dying?
  • How much do you trust your diagnosis?
  • Where did you find the information?

Learning Outcomes

  • Critically evaluate sources.
  • Identify library sources and how to access them.
  • Understand the importance of context when using sources.

Trusted vs. Less Trusted Sources

  • Trusted sources include library databases, subject matter experts, updated information, and reviewed content.
  • Less trusted sources include websites with unknown authors, old information, and unreviewed content.

Source Reliability

  • Reliable sources provide impartial information.
  • Unreliable sources aim to sell, influence, or promote a specific agenda. -Consider the source's purpose and potential biases.
  • Publishers, non-profits, companies, and lobby groups are examples of entities that can be sources.
  • Understanding the "who" behind a source is crucial in assessing reliability.

Evaluating Microsoft's Website as a Source

  • Consider whether claims on a business website, such as Microsoft's claim that the Surface Pro has "unrivalled flexibility," are really true.
  • Ask why a company is making certain claims about its products.

Microsoft's Documentation

  • Users should determine whether they find content in Microsoft's Documentation trustworthy.
  • Users should consider whether they believe a software provider may have reason to provide misleading information.

Examining Helpdesk Software

  • When examining sources like "10 Best FREE Helpdesk Ticketing Software (An Unbiased Guide)", consider:
  • Why was the guide written?
  • Is the information truly unbiased?
  • Who is the author?

Finding Trusted Sources

  • Determine who wrote the source material.
  • Determine why it was written.
  • Determine what the writer has to gain.
  • Decide whether the material contains facts or opinions.

Wikipedia's Role

  • Wikipedia should NOT be referenced for this course.
  • It is important to determine who wrote it.
  • The platform can be useful to understand a topic and as a source of creative commons images.
  • Wikipedia can serve as a starting point for research.
  • Check articles reference list.

Personal Reputation and Source Material

  • Use research to make recommendations.
  • Your reputation will rely on your recommendations.
  • Does your recommendation increase confidence and trust?

Ad-Speak Strategies Employed by Advertisers

  • Strategies include:
  • Emotion, hyperbole, vagueness, and partial information
  • Recognize these strategies in advertising and other communications.

Examples of Ad-Speak

  • Phrases like "This product is unbelievably good" are vague and difficult to verify.
  • Claims such as "This product is very user-friendly" may lack specific supporting details.
  • Generic statements like "This is the perfect fit for your company" without tailored reasoning are questionable.
  • Statements such as "This product will make you happy" rely on emotional appeal rather than concrete benefits.

Assessing Ease of Use

  • Determine if Microsoft Word is easy to use.
  • Determine which explanation is stronger.

Analysis of Claims About Microsoft Word

  • Claims that "Microsoft Word is widely regarded as one of the easiest and most accessible word processing tools" require scrutiny.
  • Stating that Microsoft Word has "several features to support new users" is a more factual and verifiable statement.
  • Identifying that "the main formatting features appear in the Home ribbon" provides concrete information to support ease of use.
  • Offering information that Microsoft provides support videos, articles, and instructions lends more weight to the claim of user-friendliness.
  • Claims based on factual, verifiable information are stronger than those based solely on opinions.

Verifying Statements

  • Verify any statements made from advertising.
  • For example, "Microsoft Word is widely regarded" statement.
  • Says Who?
  • How can it be verified the product is:Widely regarded, Easiest, Most accessible, User-friendly, Extensive?

Accessibility Verification

  • How accessible is it?
  • Who says it is the most accessible?

Identifying the Source

  • Determine who wrote the statements.

Generative AI Writing

  • Generative AI writes in ad-speak.
  • Approaches used:
  • Hyperbole
  • Vagueness
  • Uncited information
  • Unreliable information

Assignments Requirements

  • Objective metrics
  • Measurable
  • Comparable

Comparing Word Processors

  • Microsoft Word is widely regarded as one of the easiest and most accessible word processing tools available, with a user-friendly interface.
  • Google Docs is a cloud-based word processor that offers ease of use, particularly for collaboration and accessibility.
  • LibreOffice Writer is a free, open-source word processor, and offers powerful features similar to Microsoft Word.

Comparing Products

  • Consider objective metrics when comparing products.
  • Product A has 240 minutes of included support time.
  • Product B has a self-serve website.
  • Product C offers a user support forum.

GenAI Usage Policy

  • GenAI may be used in assignments for this course, if you follow the reference guidelines.
  • GenAI references are required.
  • Output must be provided.
  • Rewrites are required.
  • Cited and referenced to reliable sources are required.
  • You are responsible for what is submitted.

Citing Software

  • Title of Software. (version or year), Publisher Name. Accessed: Mon. DD, YYYY. [Type of Medium]. Available: site/path/file

Citing ChatGPT

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

More Like This

Media Literacy and Information Evaluation
17 questions
Information Literacy Key Concepts
40 questions
Understanding Information Literacy
16 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser