Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to Article 35 of the European Court of Human Rights, when can the Court deal with a matter?
According to Article 35 of the European Court of Human Rights, when can the Court deal with a matter?
- If the matter is submitted anonymously
- If the matter has already been examined by another court
- After three months from the date on which the final decision was taken
- After all domestic remedies have been exhausted within six months (correct)
Under Article 35, what would lead to the Court declaring an individual application inadmissible?
Under Article 35, what would lead to the Court declaring an individual application inadmissible?
- The application is compatible with the provisions of the Convention
- The application is submitted in a timely manner
- The application contains no relevant new information (correct)
- The application has been exhaustively reviewed by domestic courts
In Malone v United Kingdom, what right did the Court find had been breached?
In Malone v United Kingdom, what right did the Court find had been breached?
- Right to freedom of speech
- Right to a fair trial
- Right to education
- Right to privacy as guaranteed by Article 8 (correct)
According to Article 35, when can the Court reject an application?
According to Article 35, when can the Court reject an application?
In what circumstances can a High Contracting Party derogate from its obligations under the Convention?
In what circumstances can a High Contracting Party derogate from its obligations under the Convention?
What was the result of the ruling in Malone v United Kingdom?
What was the result of the ruling in Malone v United Kingdom?
Which of the following is NOT subject to derogation under Article 15?
Which of the following is NOT subject to derogation under Article 15?
What did the House of Lords conclude in the case of A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2004)?
What did the House of Lords conclude in the case of A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2004)?
What does the concept of 'margin of appreciation' refer to in the context of human rights?
What does the concept of 'margin of appreciation' refer to in the context of human rights?
What is a recognized act of free speech in one country but may offend religious sensibilities in another?
What is a recognized act of free speech in one country but may offend religious sensibilities in another?