10 Questions
What was the name of the plaintiff in the Cassis de Dijon-Case?
Rewe-Zentral AG
The problem of the importer of the Cassis de Dijon was
that the content of alcohol was too low for the German market
In the Cassis de Dijon case the ECJ
introduced besides the already explicitly mentioned reasons in (now) Art. 36 TFEU new reasons to satisfy mandatory requirements relating in particular to the effective of fiscal supervision, the protection of public health, the fairness of commercial transactions and the defense of the consumer
In the Cassis de Dijon case the ECJ
considered the Art. 37 (state monopolies) to be irrelevant, since the German provisions in question did not concern the exercise of its specific function, but applied in a general manner to the production and marketing of alcoholic beverages
In the Dassonville case the ECJ decided
All trading rules enacted by member states which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-community trade are to be considered as measures having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions
The Dassonville case
was referred by the Tribunal de premiere instance of Brussels,
In the Dassonville case
The preliminary ruling was initiated within the context of a criminal proceedings pending before a court in Belgium and in a civil action
The Dassonville case dealt with a restriction of individuals
making use of the freedom of goods
The ECJ developed the acte claire doctrine
in the Cilfit-Case
The act claire doctrine concerns
The preliminary ruling procedure
Test your knowledge of the landmark Cassis de Dijon case, a pivotal ruling in the European Union's development. Learn about the plaintiff and the impact of the case on EU law. Explore the significance of this case in the integration of EU member states.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
