Recent Lessons

Show all results for ""

Feature Overview

Ace your exams with our all-in-one platform for creating and sharing quizzes and tests.

Quizzes

Create quizzes and tests automatically from your content using AI.

Flashcards

Automatically turn your notes into digital flashcards.

Share, Export & Embed

Share with classmates or export to Excel and your learning management system.

Stats & Reporting

Auto-grading quizzes and tests with detailed stats and reports.

Mobile Apps

The smarter way to study – wherever you are.

Pricing

Search...

10 Questions

1 Views

EU Law: Cassis de Dijon Case

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz

Study Flashcards

Spaced Repetition

Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the name of the plaintiff in the Cassis de Dijon-Case?

Rewe-Zentral AG (correct)

Dassonville

Rewe-Zentralfinanz

Federal Monopoly Administration for spirits

The problem of the importer of the Cassis de Dijon was

that the content of alcohol was too low for the German market (correct)

that the content of alcohol was too high for the German market

that the German Federal Monopoly Administration did have enough staff to de clearance request of the importer

not existing

In the Cassis de Dijon case the ECJ

introduced besides the already explicitly mentioned reasons in (now) Art. 36 TFEU new reasons to satisfy mandatory requirements relating in particular to the effective of fiscal supervision, the protection of public health, the fairness of commercial transactions and the defense of the consumer (correct)

denied the existence of other mandatory requirements to justify obstacles in the internal market.

Accepted the reason of protecting the public health as invoked by the German government

Considered the fixing of a maximum alcohol content of alcoholic beverages to be a measure having an equivalent effect.

In the Cassis de Dijon case the ECJ

considered the Art. 37 (state monopolies) to be irrelevant, since the German provisions in question did not concern the exercise of its specific function, but applied in a general manner to the production and marketing of alcoholic beverages Signup and view all the answers

In the Dassonville case the ECJ decided

All trading rules enacted by member states which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-community trade are to be considered as measures having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions Signup and view all the answers

The Dassonville case

was referred by the Tribunal de premiere instance of Brussels, Signup and view all the answers

In the Dassonville case

The preliminary ruling was initiated within the context of a criminal proceedings pending before a court in Belgium and in a civil action Signup and view all the answers