Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the main focus of the case T-673/13?
What is the main focus of the case T-673/13?
- Compliance check of a chemical substance registration
- Annulment of a regulatory act regarding animal testing (correct)
- Appeal against a decision by the European Court
- Regulation of chemical substances in animal experiments
Who represented the applicant in the case?
Who represented the applicant in the case?
- M. Heikkilä
- J. Stuyck
- A.Dittrich
- D. Thomas (correct)
What type of organization is the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments?
What type of organization is the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments?
- An environmental regulation body
- A government agency
- A pharmaceutical company
- An animal welfare group (correct)
Which chemical substance was the subject of the registration dossier reviewed by ECHA?
Which chemical substance was the subject of the registration dossier reviewed by ECHA?
What was requested from the third party in the decision made by ECHA?
What was requested from the third party in the decision made by ECHA?
How many Member States does the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments have member organizations in?
How many Member States does the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments have member organizations in?
Who are the judges composed in the General Court for this case?
Who are the judges composed in the General Court for this case?
What is the role of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)?
What is the role of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)?
What was the request made by ECHA to Lanxess regarding triphenyl phosphate?
What was the request made by ECHA to Lanxess regarding triphenyl phosphate?
Which regulation allows Lanxess to appeal the decision of ECHA?
Which regulation allows Lanxess to appeal the decision of ECHA?
What was the decision made by the Board of Appeal of ECHA on 10 October 2013?
What was the decision made by the Board of Appeal of ECHA on 10 October 2013?
Which species was specified for the pre-natal developmental toxicity study requested by ECHA?
Which species was specified for the pre-natal developmental toxicity study requested by ECHA?
What was the timeframe given to Lanxess to submit the required additional information?
What was the timeframe given to Lanxess to submit the required additional information?
What consequence did the Board of Appeal impose regarding the appeal fee?
What consequence did the Board of Appeal impose regarding the appeal fee?
What did the Board of Appeal grant to the applicant concerning Lanxess's application?
What did the Board of Appeal grant to the applicant concerning Lanxess's application?
Under which article of the Regulation does ECHA operate to allow appeals?
Under which article of the Regulation does ECHA operate to allow appeals?
Flashcards
ECHA
ECHA
European Chemicals Agency
Triphenyl phosphate
Triphenyl phosphate
A chemical substance
Registration dossier
Registration dossier
A document recording details of the chemical substance
Animal experiments
Animal experiments
Signup and view all the flashcards
Compliance check
Compliance check
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intervener
Intervener
Signup and view all the flashcards
Annulment
Annulment
Signup and view all the flashcards
Application for registration
Application for registration
Signup and view all the flashcards
REACH Regulation
REACH Regulation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Decision of 5 April 2012
Decision of 5 April 2012
Signup and view all the flashcards
Board of Appeal
Board of Appeal
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intervene in support
Intervene in support
Signup and view all the flashcards
Contested Decision
Contested Decision
Signup and view all the flashcards
Appeal Fee
Appeal Fee
Signup and view all the flashcards
Reimbursement
Reimbursement
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
General Court of the European Union - Order of March 13, 2015
- Case: T-673/13
- Applicant: European Coalition to End Animal Experiments
- Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
- Issue: Action for annulment regarding application for registration of triphenyl phosphate, concerning a request for regulatory action not directly affecting the applicant
Background
- Applicant is a European animal welfare group, recognized by ECHA
- ECHA initiated a compliance check of a registration dossier for triphenyl phosphate submitted by Lanxess
- ECHA requested a second species pre-natal developmental toxicity study on the substance (rabbit)
- Lanxess appealed this decision to the ECHA Board of Appeal
- The Board of Appeal dismissed the appeal and required Lanxess to provide the additional information within 24 months
Decision
- The General Court found the action inadmissible
- The applicant (the European Coalition to End Animal Experiments) was not directly affected by the regulatory decision, thus they lacked standing to challenge it.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.