Ethics of Organ Sales and Health Care

A statement that expresses a viewpoint or stance on a particular issue. It can be explicit, like an opinion, or implicit, like an image symbolizing a belief.

A type of writing that presents a specific viewpoint and uses logic, evidence, and reasoning to persuade the reader to agree with it.

Claims or ideas that support the main argument in an essay. They should be specific and have evidence to back them up.

Facts, statistics, examples, or expert opinions that prove the validity of a claim or argument.

Presenting a different perspective or opposing view to the main argument. This helps strengthen the essay by addressing potential counterpoints.

A response to a counterargument that defends the original argument and strengthens its validity.

An argument that uses reason, logic, and factual evidence to convince the reader.

An argument that appeals to the reader's emotions or feelings to persuade them.

A serious kidney condition where the organ stops functioning properly, requiring dialysis or transplantation.

A medical treatment for kidney failure that filters the blood artificially, keeping patients alive but requiring frequent sessions and causing fatigue.

A surgical procedure to replace a malfunctioning kidney with a healthy one, offering a more permanent solution than dialysis.

The process of ensuring compatibility between a donor and recipient's tissues for successful transplantation.

Drugs used after transplantation to suppress the recipient's immune system, preventing rejection of the new organ.

An illegal system for buying and selling human organs, often at a high cost, involving brokers and foreign hospitals.

The practice of donating a kidney to a person in need, often from a family member or friend, without financial compensation.

A waiting list for a kidney transplant from deceased donors, usually with a long wait time due to the limited availability of organs.

The act of giving something of value without expecting anything in return.

A financial incentive to encourage people to donate organs.

The argument that allowing organ sales would exploit poor individuals.

The idea that illegal organ trading already exists, and legalization would offer better control.

The argument that legalizing organ sales would allow for better regulation and monitoring.

The potential health risks associated with organ donation, which should be explained to potential donors.

Ensuring fair compensation to organ donors to acknowledge their sacrifice.

The importance of educating potential organ donors about the procedure and its implications.

The practice of obtaining a kidney from a living donor, often motivated by financial gain for the donor in poverty-stricken regions.

The argument that selling a kidney is justified because it provides an immediate financial opportunity for individuals in extreme poverty. The claim is that it’s their choice to take the risk, and it provides a lifeline for them.

The counterargument that selling one's kidney is risky and potentially harmful to the donor's health. It emphasizes the potential health consequences for the donor even if they survive the operation.

The argument that the act of selling organs is inherently wrong and devalues the human body, violating the dignity of the human person.

The counterargument that moral beliefs surrounding selling organs are influenced by societal perspectives and may not be universally accepted, especially by those in dire situations.

The argument that despite the risks, individuals in poverty have the right to make their own choice to sell a kidney, if it presents the best opportunity for survival and improvement.

The perspective that individuals who live in wealth and privilege often impose their moral values on those in poverty, without truly understanding their struggles and needs. This can lead to a disconnect in understanding the motivations behind selling organs.

The ethical dilemma of reconciling the potential benefits of living kidney trade with the concerns surrounding the exploitation of vulnerable individuals in poverty.

The unethical and often dangerous practice of buying and selling kidneys outside of legal and regulated medical systems.

A system of rules and regulations designed to control and oversee the sale and transplantation of kidneys.

People who act as intermediaries, connecting kidney buyers and sellers, often charging a fee for their services.

The argument that legalizing kidney sales would allow governments to better monitor and regulate the practice, reducing risks for both buyers and sellers.

The argument that legalizing kidney sales would allow individuals to benefit financially from donating a kidney, potentially improving their lives, especially those living in poverty.

The viewpoint advocating for legalizing kidney sales to provide access to transplants for individuals who need them, potentially saving lives.