10 Questions
What is the main issue with the CEFR system, according to the passage?
It forces people into a linear path, ignoring individual strengths and weaknesses
What happens when someone scores 'A1' in listening and 'C2' in reading, according to the passage?
Their scores are averaged for an overall score of approximately B2
Why does the author argue that the CEFR system is problematic?
Because it does not account for individual differences in language learning
What is an example of a limitation of the CEFR system, according to the passage?
A learner who scores A1 in listening and C2 in reading
What phenomenon does the author describe when a C2 learner encounters a native speaker using unfamiliar vocabulary?
The Dunning-Kruger effect
What is the primary characteristic of people experiencing the Dunning-Kruger effect?
They have limited competence in a particular domain and overestimate their abilities.
According to the CEFR, what does a C2 level measure?
Competence, ability, and practical skills that may or may not transfer to the real world.
What is the primary difference between C2 and C2-Native-like levels?
C2-Native-like requires the ability to comprehend social context clues and regional dialects.
What is a key characteristic of a person who has reached the C2-Native-like level?
They can understand complex papers or simple readings at instantaneous rates.
How is the competence scale related to the levels described by TOEFL?
The competence scale is not a linear progression from C2 to C2-Native-like.
Study Notes
Language Learning and CEFR
- Language learning is not linear and cannot be categorized into a straightforward path.
- The Common European Reference Framework (CEFR) is a system used to measure language proficiency, with six levels: A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2, ranging from beginner to proficient.
- However, the CEFR system has its limitations, as it averages scores across different skills, which may not accurately reflect a learner's abilities.
Limitations of CEFR
- A learner may excel in one skill, such as reading, but struggle in another, such as listening, yet be categorized as an intermediate user.
- The CEFR system does not account for individual differences, such as learning disabilities, which can affect a person's language proficiency.
- The system also assumes that a learner's language skills will transfer seamlessly to real-life situations, which may not always be the case.
Beyond C2
- There are unofficial reference levels beyond C2, such as those offered by TOEFL, which recognize higher levels of language proficiency.
- These levels, including C2-Full user proficiency and C2-Native-like, require learners to demonstrate advanced skills, such as the ability to engage in conversations on any topic, understand complex texts, and translate with full context.
- These levels of comprehension are not achieved through linear progression, but rather through a complex interplay of skills and competencies.
Explore the limitations of the CEFR linear approach to language learning and discover the nuances of language proficiency beyond the C2 level.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
