Emergency Care Principles and Legalities Quiz

Study Notes

Emergency care principles emphasize doing no harm, and adhering to laws and standards of care can help EMS providers avoid legal actions.
Ethics guide what is considered right and wrong in emergency medical care, even if care is provided properly, lawsuits can still occur.
Scope of practice outlines the boundaries of emergency care an AEMT is authorized to provide, typically defined by state law and medical control protocols.
Authorization to provide care is given by the medical director through online or offline medical control, following protocols and standing orders.
Practicing procedures outside of the authorized scope can be considered negligence or a criminal offense in some states.
EMS providers have a legal duty to provide proper and consistent patient care, following standards of care and reporting any issues to the medical director.
The standard of care requires EMS providers to act in a certain way towards patients based on training and experience, compared to similar professionals in similar circumstances.
MTALA ensures patients receive essential emergency medical treatment regardless of their ability to pay, aiming to prevent patient dumping based on financial status.
Laws and regulations govern patient transfers, requiring proper documentation, adherence to protocols, and ensuring care falls within the provider's scope of practice.
Negligence, including malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance, can result in legal repercussions if care falls below the accepted standard.
Good Samaritan laws protect individuals providing emergency medical care in good faith from liability for errors or omissions.- Good Samaritan laws vary by state and may not always protect individuals from lawsuits.
Immunity from liability is granted to emergency medical service providers in specific circumstances, depending on state laws.
Consent is required from mentally competent adults before providing emergency medical care.
Express consent involves patients acknowledging that they want care and being of legal age to make decisions.
Implied consent applies in true emergency situations when patients are unable to make decisions.
In cases of minors, parents or legal guardians must give consent for treatment, but in some states minors can give valid consent based on their age and maturity level.
Emancipated minors can make their own medical decisions under certain circumstances.
In the absence of a parent, responsible adults in loco parentis can make treatment decisions for minors.
State laws generally do not permit parents to deny emergency medical treatment to minors.
Forcible restraint may be necessary in cases where a patient poses a threat to themselves or others, but must be done within legal guidelines and protocols.
Patients have the right to refuse treatment, even if it may result in death or serious injury, presenting an ethical dilemma for EMS personnel.
Documenting refusal of treatment and transport thoroughly is crucial to protect against potential legal issues.

Description

Test your knowledge on ethical considerations, laws, standards of care, scope of practice, legal duties, consent, and patient rights in emergency medical care. Learn about good Samaritan laws, negligence, patient transfers, and the importance of thorough documentation.