Questions and Answers
What clause did Elk cite to gain citizenship?
Citizenship Clause of the 14th amendment
What prompted the Elk case?
He wanted to vote, but was denied
Who denied Elk the right to vote and where?
Charles Wilkins in Omaha
When did Elk occur?
Signup and view all the answers
Which Act negated Elk?
Signup and view all the answers
What did the court rule in Elk?
Signup and view all the answers
Why was Elk denied the right to vote, according to the court?
Signup and view all the answers
Was Elk ever formally overturned?
Signup and view all the answers
Elk separated himself from his tribe.
Signup and view all the answers
How did Congress describe tribes?
Signup and view all the answers
The court held Elk was not ________ of the United States at birth.
Signup and view all the answers
What two amendments did Plessy challenge?
Signup and view all the answers
Why did the railroad agree to test the separate but equal car act?
Signup and view all the answers
What fraction of Black was Plessy?
Signup and view all the answers
Who recruited Plessy?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the issue in Plessy?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the ruling in Plessy?
Signup and view all the answers
Why did separate but equal not violate the 14th amendment?
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Elk v. Wilkins Case Overview
- Elk cited the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment to claim citizenship rights.
- The case arose because Elk sought the right to vote but was denied access.
Denial of Voting Rights
- The denial occurred in Omaha by Charles Wilkins.
- Elk's case was presented in 1884.
Legislative Context
- The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 later negated Elk's claims.
- The court ruled that Elk, born on a reservation, was not entitled to vote.
Court's Justification
- The court maintained that Elk owed allegiance to the reservation, not the U.S.
- Elk's status as a citizen was not formally overturned.
Relationship with Tribe
- Elk had separated himself from his tribe, as recognized by the court.
Congressional Views
- Congress described Native American tribes as alien nations, not foreign states.
Subject to Jurisdiction
- The court determined Elk was not subject to U.S. jurisdiction at birth.
Related Case: Plessy v. Ferguson
- Plessy challenged both the 13th and 14th Amendments.
- The railroad agreed to challenge the separate but equal car act due to unnecessary costs.
Plessy's Background
- Plessy was one-eighth black, which was central to his case.
- He was recruited by a Committee of Citizens for the legal challenge.
Core Issue in Plessy v. Ferguson
- The key question was whether the separate car acts violated the 14th Amendment.
Supreme Court's Ruling in Plessy
- The ruling asserted that separate but equal did not violate the 14th Amendment.
- The court justified its position by stating that the separate black car was not deemed inferior to the whites' car.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
Explore the significant details of the Elk v. Wilkins case through this quiz. Review essential facts, including the Citizenship Clause of the 14th Amendment and the historical context surrounding Elk's denied voting rights in 1884. Test your knowledge of this landmark legal case.