Electoral Tribunal Jurisdiction

In BANAT v. COMELEC, the Court declared that the jurisdiction of the Electoral Tribunals can be invoked only after what?

According to the Supreme Court, who may question the illegally or invalidly procured certificate of naturalization?

According to the Supreme Court, private persons may raise the matter of naturalization in an election case involving the naturalized citizen's descendant.

According to the Supreme Court, what does the power of the HRET not carry with it?

The House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal would have jurisdiction have jurisdiction over the qualifications of candidates who have not been proclaimed as winners.

What does the proclamation of a winning candidate divest?

According to the Reyes case, what would strictly adhering to rules necessitate?

According to the 2011 Rules of the House of Representatives Electoral, how many days from the proclamation of the winning candidates must election protests and petitions for quo warranto be filled?

For the House of Representatives, when does the term of Members commence?

According to the Supreme Court, when does the jurisdiction of the HRET begin?

According to the Court, to be considered a Member of the House of Representatives, which of the following is needed?

According to Reyes v. Commission on Elections, before whom should a proper oath be taken?

What should the petitioner file to remedy winning in the congressional elections?

The decisions rendered by the Electoral Tribunals in the contests mentioned in this section, of which they are the sole judge, are non-appealable.

According to Macalintal v. Presidential Electoral Tribunal , what is 'essentially an exercise of judicial power'?

Electoral Tribunals are courts of law.

In Robles v. House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal, what was affirmed?

It is aptly noted in the first of the questioned Resolutions that the framers of the Constitution could not have been unaware of the possibility of an election contest that would involve all 24 Senators-elect, six of whom would inevitably have to sit in judgment thereon. Indeed, such possibility would surface again in the wake of the 1992 elections when once more, but for the last time, all 24 seats in the Senate will be at stake. Yet the Constitution provides no scheme or mode for settling such unusual situations or for the substitution of Senators designated to the Tribunal whose ______ may be sought.

What right did the respondent body (predecessor of the Electoral Tribunals) have?

In Abbas v. Senate Electoral Tribunal, who were the petitioners?

Legislators are prohibited from being financially interested in any contract with the government or any subdivision, agency or instrumentality thereof during their term of office.

In Puyat v. De Guzman, what did the legislator do after his representation was challenged under the above-mentioned section?

Appearance of the legislator is now only barred before the Electoral Tribunals.

General Court Martial has been characterized by the Supreme Court as any other administrative body.

What ought not to have been established as a private corporation by a special law?

Membership in the Electoral Tribunals is prohibited by the Constitution.

Legislators who serve as treaty negotiators can no longer sit in the Congress.

What is the term for the simultaneous holding of that office and the seat in the Congress?

For Congress, what is a new provision intended to ensure the probity and objectivity of the members?

Records and books of Congress need not be open to the public.

What is the remedy if there has been any mistake in the printing of a bill before it was certified by the officers of Congress and approved by the Executive?

What is the rule that our cases manifest firm adherence to?

But except only where the matters are required to be entered in the journals, like the yeas and nays on the final reading of a bill or on any question at the request of one-fifth of the members present, the contents of the enrolled bill shall prevail over those of the journals in case of ______.

In the case of Casco Philippine chemical co. v. Gimenez, what did petitioners claim the phrase 'urea formaldehyde' as used in a statute should be read as?

In US v. Pons, what did the supreme court refuse to go beyond?

The Court cannot annul any expulsion or suspension of a member unless what?

According to the document, what significantly constricts the future legislators' room for action and flexibility?

Which of the following was an example of incompatible office given in the text?

The new rule on the legislative sessions is the following: Sec. 12. All Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives shall, upon assumption of office, make a full disclosure of their financial and business interests.

In Alauya v. Limbona, what was declared as ineligible, and punished?

According to Section 8 of the law, under what cases no change of names or alteration of the order of nominees shall be allowed?

According to the Supreme Court, what does domicile denote?

What does the literacy requirement now specifically prescribed because of?

According to Article IV, Section 2 of the Constitution what are natural born citizens?

Under present rules The Congress of the Philippines does not consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.

According to Section 2, what shall the Senate be composed of?

According to the document, for what was the Senate originally intended?

For what were the unapproved cityhood bills filed during the 11th Congress a good example?

In Maquiling v. Commission on Elections, what was declared?

In social Justice Society v. Dangerous Drugs Board, what was declared unconstitutional?

In Limbona v. COMELEC, what did the Court declare?

When seeking a change of domicile, a candidate must demonstrate what?

When did the term The members of the Senate have their term originally under the old Constitution?