Horizontal mergers and Cournot competition
8 Questions
39 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Under which condition is a merger between symmetric Cournot competitors considered profitable in the absence of efficiency gains?

  • If less than 50% of the firms merge.
  • If at least 80% of the firms in the market merge. (correct)
  • If exactly 70% of the firms merge.
  • If at least 50% of the firms merge.
  • What can make mergers profitable but detrimental to consumers?

  • Lower prices
  • High market concentration (correct)
  • Increased competition
  • Efficiency gains
  • Profitability of a merger is always a sufficient condition for welfare improvement.

    False

    What happens in price competition when one firm sets a higher price?

    <p>It positively impacts the profit of other firms.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Mergers are necessarily _______ if there are no efficiency gains.

    <p>welfare-detrimental</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characterizes negative externalities in quantity competition?

    <p>One firm's increase in production negatively impacts profits of others</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do firms aim to do when they coordinate their decisions?

    <p>Maximize total profits by internalizing externalities</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens to firm 3's production when firms 1 and 2 decrease their quantity?

    <p>Firm 3 increases its quantity</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Horizontal Mergers

    • Horizontal mergers involve companies at the same level in the supply chain combining to form a single entity.
    • Decision factors include the potential impacts on efficiency, pricing strategies, and competition authorities' scrutiny.

    Effects of Coordinated Decisions

    • Coordinated actions by firms can maximize overall profits but may ignore externalities that impact other firms.
    • For example, a firm's production increase may negatively affect its competitors' profits.

    Types of Competition

    • Quantity Competition: Firms compete by choosing how much to produce. If one firm increases output, it can harm others, leading to strategic substitutes.
    • Price Competition: Firms set prices instead. A price increase by one firm could benefit others, resulting in strategic complements.

    Externality Impact

    • Negative externalities push firms to decrease production when coordinating.
    • Positive externalities encourage firms to increase production together.

    Consumer Effects

    • Coordination in quantity competition results in lesser negative impacts on consumers than in price competition.
    • Price coordination generally leads to higher prices and more significant consumer harm.

    Cournot Model Overview

    • Consumers aim to maximize utility based on quantities produced by firms.
    • Firms respond to each other's output in a way that considers cost and demand, leading to best-response functions.

    Nash Equilibrium

    • Achieved when firms' reaction functions intersect, indicating that no firm can benefit by unilaterally changing its output.
    • Equilibrium involves both firms choosing quantities where their total output optimally matches market demand.

    Extensions to Multiple Firms

    • In settings with multiple firms with varying costs:
      • Aggregated production equals the sum of individual outputs.
      • Nash equilibrium extends to assess the impact of each firm’s marginal costs on overall market output and pricing.
    • With an increase in the number of firms, competitive pressure rises, often leading to lower equilibrium prices.
    • The presence of more firms typically results in fewer profits per individual firm, depending on their costs and production behavior.### Mergers Between Firms
    • Demand for firms with homogeneous products follows a linear model.
    • Firms assume constant marginal costs in a Cournot competition setting.
    • Seven firms considering merging (range: 2 to 9 firms).
    • Merging does not create efficiency gains; firms remain symmetric post-merger.

    Impact on Active Firms

    • Number of active firms before merger: 9.
    • After merger: 9 - non-merged firms + merged entity, resulting in a decrease in active firms.

    Profitability of Mergers

    • Analyze profits of merged entity before and after the merger.
    • Important to compare total profits of merging firms before the merger.
    • “80% Rule”: Mergers are only profitable if they involve at least 80% of firms in the market.
    • Profitability relies on the balance between reduced production quantity and reactions from outside firms.

    Synergies from Mergers

    • Synergies arise from operational rationalization, resulting in lower marginal costs for the merged entity.
    • Marginal cost before merger: uniform across firms; after merger, varies with non-merging firms maintaining higher costs.
    • Mergers are profitable if they lead to significant cost synergies without creating a highly concentrated market.

    Example of Mergers with Synergies

    • In a scenario with three firms considering a merger, initial Nash Equilibrium (NE) profits are calculated pre-merger.
    • Post-merger calculations yield different outputs and profits, dependent on the degree of synergies.
    • For a merger to increase consumer surplus, the new pricing conditions must favor consumers.

    Welfare Analysis of Mergers

    • Total surplus criterion combines consumer surplus and total profit from both insiders and outsiders.
    • Merger approval hinges on the condition that overall changes in total surplus must be positive.
    • Efficiency gains can counterbalance the adverse effects of reduced competition from mergers.

    Key Takeaways from Welfare Analysis

    • Mergers that create efficiencies without excessive market concentration can benefit total welfare.
    • When mergers lead to high market concentration, they can be profitable while still harming consumers or overall social welfare.

    Price Competition Context

    • Price competition differs from quantity competition, featuring positive externalities.
    • If a firm raises prices, profits for other firms may rise too, resulting in upward-sloping reaction functions.
    • Without efficiency gains, mergers might be welfare-detrimental despite being profitable due to price adjustments in the market.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Regulation Of Mergers PDF

    Description

    Explore the welfare analysis of mergers through the lens of efficiency defense and its impact on profitability and societal welfare. This quiz evaluates cases involving multiple firms and examines the balance between profit and consumer impact.

    More Like This

    Unit 7
    48 questions

    Unit 7

    TriumphantTsavorite avatar
    TriumphantTsavorite
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser