Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which of these best describes the central premise of the Nebular Hypothesis as proposed by Kant and Laplace?
Which of these best describes the central premise of the Nebular Hypothesis as proposed by Kant and Laplace?
- Planets were created by the accretion of solids within a disk-shaped cloud.
- Planets originated from material ejected due to a near collision with a wandering star.
- Planets condensed from a cloud of material surrounding a young, slowly rotating sun. (correct)
- Planets formed from a solar nebula composed primarily of hydrogen and helium.
What was the specific modification to the nebular hypothesis proposed by Chamberlain and Moulton?
What was the specific modification to the nebular hypothesis proposed by Chamberlain and Moulton?
- The sun had a companion star which greatly affected the formation of planets.
- The sun's rotation was responsible for planets formation.
- A passing star drew material from the sun which became the planets. (correct)
- Planets formed from rotating solar nebulae of hydrogen, helium and dust.
According to the binary theories of Jeans and Jeffrey, what was a key factor in the formation of planets?
According to the binary theories of Jeans and Jeffrey, what was a key factor in the formation of planets?
- A disk-shaped cloud of dust and gas around the sun.
- The existence of a companion to the sun. (correct)
- A collision between the sun and another star.
- The gradual cooling of the solar nebula.
The revised nebular hypothesis, proposed by Schmidt and Weizsäcker, introduces which key mechanism for early planet formation?
The revised nebular hypothesis, proposed by Schmidt and Weizsäcker, introduces which key mechanism for early planet formation?
Which of the following statements accurately reflects a difference between the early Nebular Hypothesis and the revised version?
Which of the following statements accurately reflects a difference between the early Nebular Hypothesis and the revised version?
Flashcards
Nebular Hypothesis
Nebular Hypothesis
Planets formed from a cloud of material around a young, slowly rotating sun.
Chamberlain and Moulton's Theory
Chamberlain and Moulton's Theory
Suggested a passing star pulled material from the sun, creating planets from this ejected material.
Binary Theories
Binary Theories
Planets formed from material pulled from a companion star to our sun.
Revised Nebular Hypothesis
Revised Nebular Hypothesis
Signup and view all the flashcards
Accretion
Accretion
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
Early Theories on the Origin of the Earth
-
Nebular Hypothesis (Kant and Laplace, 1796): Planets formed from a cloud of material around a young, slow-rotating sun.
-
Chamberlain and Moulton (1900): A passing star caused material to be ripped from the sun, forming a cigar-shaped cloud that condensed into planets.
-
Binary Theories (Jeans and Jeffrey): A companion star to the sun interacted, leading to planet formation.
-
Revised Nebular Hypothesis (Schmidt and Weizsäcker, 1950): The sun was enveloped by a solar nebula composed of hydrogen, helium, and dust. Friction and collisions resulted in a disk-shaped cloud. Planets formed through accretion (solids combining to form larger bodies).
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.