Dental Reconstruction Concepts Quiz

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Match the following types of reconstructions with their characteristics:

Implant-supported reconstructions = Used for edentulous patients Tooth-supported reconstructions = Restores gaps with existing teeth Metal-based reconstructions = Considered gold standard in traditional dentistry All-ceramic reconstructions = Recent evidence supporting aesthetic preferences

Match the following materials with their purposes in dental reconstructions:

Gold-based alloys = Framework for metal-based reconstructions Feldspathic ceramics = Veneering material for aesthetic finish Ceramics = New framework materials evolution Prophylaxis regimens = Improving oral hygiene for patients

Match the following dental concepts with their relevance:

Systematic reviews = Comparative analysis of reconstruction types Clinical data pooling = Gathering evidence for decision-making Single tooth gaps = Restoration preference in modern dentistry Multi-tooth gaps = More common in partially edentulous patients

Match the following factors influencing reconstruction decisions:

Socio-economic factors = Impacting the number of teeth available Oral hygiene regimens = Effectiveness depends on patient compliance Evidence-based data = Supports clinical decision-making Recall programs = Increases patient regularity for maintenance Signup and view all the answers

Match the following reconstruction characteristics with their descriptions:

Metal-based = Durable and traditionally used All-ceramic = Aesthetic but may have lower strength Tooth-supported = Relies on adjacent teeth for support Implant-supported = Does not rely on natural teeth Signup and view all the answers

Match the following statements about both reconstruction types:

Implant-supported advantages = Can replace missing teeth without natural tooth involvement Tooth-supported advantages = Utilizes existing teeth for added stability Recent evidence findings = Focuses on aesthetics and functionality Complication rates = Need to be minimized for patient satisfaction Signup and view all the answers

Match the following dental reconstruction trends with their implications:

Increased number of teeth = Leads to more treatment options Shift to partially edentulous = Indicates changing patient demographics New materials development = Innovation in dental technology Prophylaxis improvement = Aims at reducing complications post-reconstruction Signup and view all the answers

Match the following terms with their definitions in dental contexts:

Fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) = Permanent solutions for tooth loss Edentulous = Condition of being without teeth Veneering = Apply a layer for aesthetics Framework materials = Base for supporting dental prosthetics Signup and view all the answers

Match the following terms related to the research study with their definitions:

FDP = Fixed Dental Prosthesis Abstract = A brief summary of a research article Hand Searching = A method of finding studies by checking reference lists Inclusion Criteria = The specific criteria for including studies in a review Signup and view all the answers

Match the following outcomes with their related studies:

Survival Rates = Measured performance of dental prostheses over time Complication Rates = Frequency of issues arising with dental implants Total Full Text Articles for Review = 37 articles for fixed dental prosthesis Final Number of Studies Included = 40 studies were selected for the review Signup and view all the answers

Match the following years with their corresponding articles:

Sailer et al. 2014 = 41 full text articles for single crowns Sailer et al. 2007 = 10 articles included in the study 2015 = Publication year for search strategy figure 2009 = Initial research phase and abstracts obtained Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of dental prostheses with their materials:

Metal-based FDPs = Made of metal materials All-ceramic FDPs = Constructed entirely of ceramic materials Single Crowns = One of the types of prosthetic restorations Fixed Removable Prostheses = Not applicable in this study context Signup and view all the answers

Match the elements of the study's methodology with their descriptions:

Electronic Search = Initial search yielding 580 titles Independently Selected = 71 titles reviewed by two reviewers Further Hand Searching = 0 studies obtained Full Text Articles = Total of 37 articles reviewed Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of retrieved articles with their outcomes:

Excluded Full Text Articles = 7 articles discarded Total Full Text Articles for Fixed Dental Prosthesis = 37 articles evaluated Total Studies Included = 40 studies finalized for review Abstracts Obtained = 71 abstracts agreed upon after review Signup and view all the answers

Match the review components with their respective counts:

Titles Agreed by Both Reviewers = 71 titles Total Titles Found in Search = 580 titles Studies Identified by Hand Search = 0 studies Total Articles After Further Reviewing = 40 studies in final inclusion Signup and view all the answers

Match the research processes with their corresponding outcomes:

Initial Review Process = 71 titles agreed by two reviewers Full Text Obtaining Process = 37 full text articles reviewed Research Conclusion = Comparison of survival rates and complication rates Final Number of Studies Overview = 40 studies selected for the final analysis Signup and view all the answers

Match the following studies with their corresponding year of publication:

Christensen and Ploeger = 2010 Eschbach et al. = 2009 Suarez et al. = 2004 Olsson et al. = 2003 Signup and view all the answers

Match the following types of ceramic materials with their respective studies:

Glass infiltrated alumina = Olsson et al. Densely sintered zirconia = Rinke et al. Signup and view all the answers

Match the following statistics with the correct study on glass infiltrated alumina:

Total = 229 Mean = 4.1 No. Studies = 28 Total no. = 943 Signup and view all the answers

Match the following authors with their total number of participants:

Rinke et al. = 99 Raigrodski et al. = 20 Eschbach et al. = 65 Soerensen et al. = 61 Signup and view all the answers

Match the following studies with their mean values of the analysis:

Rinke et al. = 6.3 Soerensen et al. = 3.0 Olsson et al. = 6.3 Raigrodski et al. = 4.7 Signup and view all the answers

Match the following terms related to the systematic review with their definitions:

Inclusion criteria = Set of standards for selecting studies for review Exclusion criteria = Conditions under which studies are not considered in the review Randomized controlled trials (RCT) = Studies where participants are randomly assigned to different interventions Mean follow-up period = Average time patients are observed after treatment Signup and view all the answers

Match the following studies with their reported confidence intervals:

Summary estimate (95% CI) = 2.31 (1.23–4.35) Eschbach et al. = 0.68 van Steyern et al. = 2.11 Christensen and Ploeger = 15.9 Signup and view all the answers

Match the following types of studies with their characteristics:

Controlled clinical trials (CCT) = Comparative studies that involve clinical interventions Prospective case series = Studies tracking patients forward in time Cohort studies = Research observing a group of patients over time Retrospective studies = Studies looking back at existing data and outcomes Signup and view all the answers

Match the following authors with their percentage values:

Eschbach et al. = 96.7% Raigrodski et al. = 100% Suarez et al. = 91.0% Olsson et al. = 91.0% Signup and view all the answers

Match the following search databases with their purposes:

Medline (PubMed) = Comprehensive database for biomedical literature Embase = Database focusing on drug and pharmaceutical research Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) = Database for clinical trial information English language limit = Filter applied to restrict search results by language Signup and view all the answers

Match the following authors with their primary outcome measures:

Eschbach et al. = No. Studies: 65 Suarez et al. = Mean: 3.0 Olsson et al. = No: 5 Soerensen et al. = Total: 61 Signup and view all the answers

Match the following specific exclusions to their descriptions:

In vitro studies = Research conducted outside a living organism Preclinical studies = Studies conducted before clinical trials on humans Reports based on questionnaires = Data collected through surveys and self-reports Follow-up of less than 3 years = Studies with inadequate observation time for outcomes Signup and view all the answers

Match the following time frames with their relevance in the study:

Minimum of 10 patients = Sample size requirement for human trials Mean follow-up of at least 3 years = Duration for assessing outcomes Publications from December 2006 = Start date for inclusion of clinical studies Publications up to December 2013 = End date for the literature search Signup and view all the answers

Match the following focused questions with their main concerns:

Survival rates of tooth-supported FDPs = Long-term success of dental prosthetics Complication rates after mean observation period = Frequency of issues following treatment Metal-supported FDPs = Specific material type in dental applications Observation period of at least 3 years = Minimum time frame for evaluating outcomes Signup and view all the answers

Match the following patient examination criteria with their descriptions:

Clinically examined = Patients assessed through actual clinical evaluation Reported materials characteristics = Details about the materials used in treatment Methods = Procedures followed during the research Results = Outcomes recorded from the studies Signup and view all the answers

Match the following terms with their relevance to the systematic review:

Systematic review = A structured summary of existing research Patient outcomes = Results observed following medical interventions Clinical studies = Research conducted on human subjects Search strategy = Methodology used to find relevant publications Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of complications with their estimated annual complication rates for overall results:

Caries on abutments = 0.29 (0.14–2.94) FDPs lost due to caries = 0.43 (0.21–0.88) FDPs lost due to periodontal disease = 0.23 (0.10–0.54) FDPs lost due to abutment tooth fracture = 0.17 (0.12–0.25) Signup and view all the answers

Match the type of FDP complication with its cumulative rate for metal ceramic FDPs:

Caries on abutments = 1.2% (0.5–2.8%) FDPs lost due to caries = 2.7% (1.2–5.9%) FDPs lost due to periodontal disease = 0.3% (0.1–0.6%) FDPs lost due to abutment tooth fracture = 0.9% (0.6–1.5%) Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of complications with their estimated annual complication rates for reinforced glass ceramic FDPs:

Caries on abutments = 0.11* (0.01–0.94) FDPs lost due to caries = 0.09* (0.01–0.76) FDPs lost due to periodontal disease = 0.60* (0.10–3.52) FDPs lost due to abutment tooth fracture = 0.09* (0.02–0.44) Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of FDP complications with their cumulative 5-year complication rates for overall results:

Caries on abutments = 1.4% (0.7–2.9%) FDPs lost due to caries = 2.1% (1.1–4.3%) FDPs lost due to periodontal disease = 1.2% (0.5–2.7%) FDPs lost due to abutment tooth fracture = 0.9% (0.6–1.3%) Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of FDP complications with their estimated annual complication rates for overall results (with asterisk indicating significance):

Caries on abutments = 0.29 (0.14–2.94) FDPs lost due to caries = 0.43* (0.21–0.88) FDPs lost due to periodontal disease = 0.23* (0.10–0.54) FDPs lost due to abutment tooth fracture = 0.17* (0.12–0.25) Signup and view all the answers

Match the types of complications associated with FDPs and their estimated cumulative complication rates:

Loss of abutment tooth = 2.2%* (0.5–8.6%) FDPs lost due to caries = 2.1%* (1.1–4.3%) Caries on abutments = 1.4% (0.7–2.9%) FDPs lost due to periodontal disease = 0.9%* (0.6–1.3%) Signup and view all the answers

Match the reasons for FDP losses with their corresponding estimated rates:

FDPs lost due to caries = 0.54* (0.24–1.22) FDPs lost due to periodontal disease = 0.06* (0.03–0.11) FDPs lost due to abutment tooth fracture = 0.19* (0.11–0.30) FDPs lost due to caries for reinforced glass ceramic = 0.09* (0.01–0.76) Signup and view all the answers

Match the reported loss of abutment vitality studies with their corresponding odds ratios:

Study 1 = 3.23 (0.91–11.42) Study 2 = 2.75 (1.50–5.07) Study 3 = 0.72 (0.26–2.01) Study 4 = 1.77 (0.49–6.44) Signup and view all the answers

Match the odds ratios with their respective confidence intervals:

3.05 = (1.21–7.69) 2.42 = (0.81–7.25) 3.07 = (1.12–8.37) 1.39 = (0.75–2.58) Signup and view all the answers

Match the odds ratios with possible interpretations based on their values:

1.11 = Indicates no significant effect 0.72 = Suggests a lower likelihood of loss 3.23 = Suggests a higher likelihood of loss 2.75 = Indicates a moderate effect Signup and view all the answers

Match the studies with their respective general conclusions:

Study A = Higher risks associated with densely sintered zirconia FDPs Study B = No significant loss reported Study C = Moderate loss of vitality observed Study D = Severe impact on abutments noted Signup and view all the answers

Match the confidence intervals with their respective odds ratios:

(0.26–2.01) = 0.72 (1.50–5.07) = 2.75 (1.12–8.37) = 3.07 (0.49–6.44) = 1.77 Signup and view all the answers

Match the values with their respective categories of risk:

0.72 = Low risk 1.11 = Neutral risk 2.75 = Moderate risk 3.23 = High risk Signup and view all the answers

Match the studies with their focus area:

Study 1 = Loss of vitality in abutments Study 2 = Effect of zirconia FDPs Study 3 = Comparative analysis of treatment methods Study 4 = Patient outcomes related to vitality Signup and view all the answers

Match the odds ratio interpretations with their implications:

3.07 = Significant concern for vitality 2.42 = Potential for notable loss 1.39 = Slight risk factors present 0.72 = Lower threshold for concern Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Glass Infiltrated Alumina

A type of dental implant material that includes glass and alumina.

Total No.

The total number of patients included in a study.