12 Questions
What is the main concern for those who identify as 'pro-choice'?
Women's autonomy as self-directed persons
What do people who identify as 'pro-life' believe in?
The fundamental goodness of existence
How do some pro-choice activists view abortion?
As a positive social good that should be embraced and celebrated
What is a major concern for some pro-life advocates according to the text?
Their love of human life not translating into policies for human flourishing
What does the Dobbs decision represent for those who identify as 'pro-choice'?
A devastating attack on women's bodily autonomy and equality
How do some pro-life advocates differ in their actions from their professed beliefs?
They love human life abstractly but not concretely
What are the two opposing ways in which both sides aim to help women, according to the passage?
According to the passage, both sides offer to help women either by securing the social and economic expedient of abortion, rather than challenging larger structural inequalities, or by going only so far in advocating policies that would protect and celebrate the biological, social and religious good that is motherhood.
What does the passage say about the tension between the two sides, and the assumption that one must choose between women or children, mothers or babies, autonomy or life?
The passage states that the tension between the two sides seems "insurmountable" and that the "false dichotomy of our discourse" forces us to choose either women or children, mothers or babies, autonomy or life. The passage argues that this assumption is a "dreadful either/or" that limits discussions about abortion.
How does the passage describe the author's own journey and perspective on this issue?
The passage states that the author has "been on both sides of this issue" and remains "committed to women's equality and full participation in society" as well as "committed to the protection of life, especially where it is most vulnerable." The author argues that these two beliefs are "not only not irreconcilable, they are mutually dependent."
What does the passage say about the "virulent reaction" to the Dobbs ruling and how it reflects the either/or framework of the abortion debate?
The passage states that the "virulent reaction to the Dobbs ruling makes clear that this dreadful either/or is our shared point of departure." It argues that "Unwillingness to choose a side is viewed as nave at best or as moral failure and political treason at worst," indicating that the binary framework of the debate leaves little room for nuanced perspectives.
What human goods does the passage say are at the heart of the opposing views on abortion?
The passage states that "we may also see real human goods at the heart of these oppositions: concern for women, concern for children."
What does the passage argue is problematic about the statement from the reproductive justice advocate who insists that we must choose between protecting the rights of women or fetuses?
The passage states that the advocate's statement that "we're all 'gonna have to decide, who do you stand up for the women or fetuses?...Are you going to violate the human rights of the people already here to protect the human rights of the people who are yet to be born?" reflects an "unstated hypothesis" that "we cannot protect both women and the unborn." The passage argues that this either/or framing is a "dreadful" and problematic assumption.
Explore the different perspectives and arguments surrounding abortion rights, including discussions on women's autonomy, equality, and bodily autonomy. Dive into the complexities of the Dobbs decision and its implications.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
