De-crystallization of Floating Charges Quiz
16 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What happens to a floating charge upon the appointment of an examiner according to Mr. Justice Blayney?

  • It becomes a fixed charge immediately.
  • It remains crystallised indefinitely.
  • It resumes its character as a floating charge. (correct)
  • It is entirely voided.
  • Why did Blayney J. argue it would be pointless to keep book debts frozen after the examiner's appointment?

  • The book debts were irrelevant to the company’s operation.
  • The receiver would have no authority to collect them. (correct)
  • The law prohibited any financial operations.
  • The company would go bankrupt the next day.
  • What purpose does Mr. Justice Blayney associate with the 1990 Act?

  • To restrict companies from trading.
  • To facilitate the liquidation procedures.
  • To protect the company and its stakeholders. (correct)
  • To increase corporate taxation.
  • How did Mr. Justice Blayney view the situation regarding the rights of debenture holders post-examiner appointment?

    <p>There is no injustice as the company continues to trade.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does section 5(2)(d) of the 1990 Act state regarding claims secured by a charge?

    <p>They can only be realized with examiner's consent.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What conclusion did Blayney J. reach regarding the nature of the charge on book debts after the examiner's appointment?

    <p>It reverted back to being a floating charge.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Blayney J. suggest would be a breach by the receiver if they insisted that the charge remain crystallised?

    <p>Breach of section 5(2)(d) of the 1990 Act.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the judgment, what would be the implication for the company if it were deprived of the use of its book debts?

    <p>It might face severe financial distress.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the appointment of the examiner signify for the receiver's authority to act?

    <p>The receiver can no longer act.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Mr. Justice Blayney, why is it inconsistent to keep book debts frozen upon the appointment of the examiner?

    <p>It prevents the company from conducting business effectively.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the core purpose of the 1990 Act as highlighted by the Chief Justice in his judgment?

    <p>To protect the company, shareholders, workforce, and creditors.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What rationale does Blayney J. provide regarding the no injustice to debenture holders after the examiner's appointment?

    <p>The companies continue to create new book debts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What consequence does Blayney J. suggest would occur if the receiver insisted on the charge on book debts remaining crystallised?

    <p>It would result in a legal breach under section 5(2)(d) of the 1990 Act.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens to the charge on book debts immediately after the appointment of the examiner according to Blayney J.?

    <p>It effectively ceases to be crystallised and becomes a floating charge again.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why would maintaining the frozen status of book debts be seen as pointless after the examiner's appointment?

    <p>The receiver would no longer have the right to collect them.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What underlying principle does Blayney J. emphasize when discussing the protection of company assets under the 1990 Act?

    <p>To ensure a company can continue trading during protection.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    De-crystallization of Floating Charges

    • A floating charge, which is not fixed, crystallises on the appointment of a receiver.
    • However, the charge can become de-crystallised, reverting to a floating charge, on appointment of an examiner.
    • This was established in the Re Holidair case.
    • A critical aspect in this is that on appointment of the examiner the receiver can no longer act.
    • Keeping the book debts frozen would be pointless.
    • Purpose of 1990 Act is the protection of the company and consequently shareholders, the workforce, and creditors.
    • It is wholly inconsistent to deprive the company of its book debts, especially if the company relies on these to survive during protection.
    • There's no injustice to debenture holders who appointed the receiver because the companies continue to trade and generate new book debts to replace those repaid.
    • The receiver would be in breach of the 1990 Act if they insisted on the charge remaining crystallised.
    • A claim against a company secured by a charge on its property requiring the examiner's consent.
    • Therefore, on the appointment of the examiner, the charge on book debts ceases to be crystallised and becomes a floating charge.
    • Appeal successful against court's decision regarding the nature of the charge on book debts.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz explores the concept of de-crystallization of floating charges, focusing on the effects of appointing an examiner versus a receiver. It examines key legal cases, such as Re Holidair, and the implications of the 1990 Act on company operations and creditors. Test your understanding of how these processes affect a company's ability to manage its debts and assets.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser