Podcast
Questions and Answers
Fully reflective reasoning is pretty much the same as:
Fully reflective reasoning is pretty much the same as:
What is the difference between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning?
What is the difference between deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning leads to a certain conclusion given true premises, while inductive reasoning provides probable support for a conclusion.
What are the two types of informal reasoning?
What are the two types of informal reasoning?
Heuristics and dialectical thinking.
Define quasi-reflective judgment and provide an example.
Define quasi-reflective judgment and provide an example.
Signup and view all the answers
Name two barriers to reasoning logically and how might you overcome them?
Name two barriers to reasoning logically and how might you overcome them?
Signup and view all the answers
Define pre-reflective judgment and give an example.
Define pre-reflective judgment and give an example.
Signup and view all the answers
What is an algorithm and provide an example?
What is an algorithm and provide an example?
Signup and view all the answers
Discuss the differences between the book's definition of thought and the definition of thought provided in class.
Discuss the differences between the book's definition of thought and the definition of thought provided in class.
Signup and view all the answers
Provide the definitions of both heuristics and dialectical reasoning.
Provide the definitions of both heuristics and dialectical reasoning.
Signup and view all the answers
Give one example of both deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning.
Give one example of both deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning.
Signup and view all the answers
Study Notes
Reflective Reasoning
- Fully reflective reasoning equates to critical thinking.
Types of Reasoning
- Deductive reasoning leads to a necessarily true conclusion when premises are true.
- Inductive reasoning allows for conclusions that may be true but are not guaranteed to be correct.
- Informal problem-solving utilizes heuristics and dialectical thinking.
Quasi-Reflective Judgment
- Quasi-reflective judgment acknowledges uncertainty in finding a singular correct answer, suggesting all perspectives are valid.
- Example: Views on spanking vary by individual belief, indicating different "correct" answers based on personal perspective.
Barriers to Logical Reasoning
- Hindsight bias and confirmation bias can obstruct logical reasoning.
- Overcoming these barriers involves consulting diverse information sources, exercising critical thinking, and avoiding assumptions about knowledge.
Pre-Reflective Judgment
- Pre-reflective judgment assumes a correct answer exists and can be discovered through sensory perception or authority.
- Example: Belief that spanking is the best discipline method based on traditional teachings rather than personal evaluation.
Problem-Solving Strategies
- An algorithm is a structured method to solve a problem, ensuring a solution regardless of user’s understanding.
- Example: Steps for completing long division.
Definitions of Thought
- The book presents thought as mental manipulation of internal representations (objects, activities, situations).
- Class definition characterizes thought as intraverbal behavior, emphasizing its behavioral aspect.
Heuristics and Dialectical Reasoning
- Heuristics are rules of thumb guiding actions or problem-solving without ensuring the best outcome.
- Dialectical reasoning evaluates opposing ideas to determine optimal solutions or reconcile differences.
Examples of Reasoning
- Deductive reasoning example: “I like fruit. Papayas are fruit. Therefore, I like papayas.”
- Inductive reasoning example: “I like fruit. Papayas are liked by many. Therefore, I probably like papayas.”
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.
Description
This quiz explores the concepts of reflective reasoning, types of reasoning, and barriers to logical reasoning. You'll delve into topics such as deductive and inductive reasoning, quasi-reflective judgment, and how biases can affect critical thinking. Test your understanding of these fundamental ideas in reasoning and judgment.
