15 Questions
What do experts often do when evaluating answers?
Make assumptions based on limited information
How do experts approach developing arguments?
By engaging in critical thinking
What is a characteristic of the way experts present possible answers?
Offering possible solutions based on experiences
What is a common approach taken by cynics towards arguments?
Questioning everything without reason
How do experts typically view provisional conclusions?
As flexible and subject to revision
What does the text suggest about accepting conclusions?
They are best thought of as provisional.
What characterizes the first approach to arguments?
Blindly assuming all arguments are true.
In critical thinking, why are 'right' answers rare, especially for complex questions?
Because conclusions are provisional and subject to change.
What is a key aspect of critical thinking, as mentioned in the text?
Accepting that conclusions may need to be discarded.
How does critical thinking relate to the strength of evidence in arguments?
It highlights the importance of rigorous evaluation of evidence.
What should be considered when evaluating the potential answer?
The quality of the argument and strength of evidence
Which factor plays a crucial role in assessing the potential answer?
The author's expertise
What helps in determining the strength of evidence supporting an answer?
The reliability of the evidence presented
Which characteristic is crucial for a strong argument?
The logical reasoning and coherence
What attitude do cynics typically have towards arguments?
They scrutinize and doubt arguments
Explore the concept of critical thinking and different approaches to arguments, as highlighted by Oxford University Press in 2021. Understand how well-reasoned conclusions are considered provisional and the importance of accepting the existence of multiple perspectives in complex questions.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free
