Critical Legal Studies: Criticisms and Deconstruction
30 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

The textual approach allows for a lot of room for judicial law-making.

False

The golden rule is applied when the words are clear and unambiguous.

False

The textual approach is derived from natural law.

False

The case of R v Kirk confirms that the legislature's intention is not decisive in determining the meaning of a statute.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The textual approach takes into account the context and presumptions of a statute.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The plain meaning approach has been rejected in South African law.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Deconstruction supports literal interpretations and positivism.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The meaning of a text is determined by the author according to deconstruction.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Structuralism claims that the meaning of language can be ascertained and pinned down from its grammatical structure.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Legal rules are determined solely by legal considerations according to critics.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The textual approach allows courts to make law.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Liberal legal traditions focus solely on the community.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The iudicis est rule means that only the legislature may supplement or alter deficiencies in legislation.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Section 39 of the Constitution reinforces the textual approach.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Deconstruction allows for a fixed final meaning of a text.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Text-in-Context Approach prioritizes the grammatical, literal meaning of words.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Courts may distort the ordinary meaning of words beyond their reasonable capabilities using a purposive approach.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The textual approach is no longer used in South African courts.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The purposive approach to statutory interpretation takes into account only the language of the statute.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The function of a court is to arrive at an interpretation that achieves the most appropriate balance between the parties and fits comfortably into the constitutional framework.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Jacobsen v Levy rule states that if the language of the statute is clear, then the statute must be interpreted literally.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The purposive approach is used to interpret statutes according to their ordinary meaning.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The court's function is to interpret statutes in a way that requires the most intrusive addition to the text.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The context of a statute includes the language of the rest of the statute and its background.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The objective intention is determined subjectively.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Mischief Rule is based on literal interpretation.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The context in which words are used does not affect their meaning.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

A word must carry the same interpretation in every statute.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The interpreter cannot consider the wider context of the provision from the outset.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The meaning of the text and context is determined before it is applied.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser