Criminal Responsibility and Mental Disorder Law
18 Questions
2 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is required to establish criminal responsibility?

  • Mens rea alone
  • Clear intention to commit a crime
  • Mens rea and actus reus (correct)
  • Actus reus alone
  • Which term is used in Canada for a person deemed not criminally responsible due to a mental disorder?

  • Mens rea
  • NCRMD (correct)
  • NGRI
  • GBMI
  • What was the main outcome of the McNaughton Rules established after the 1843 case?

  • A person must prove they did not understand the act's nature or that it was wrong (correct)
  • Wild animals cannot be punished for crimes
  • Diminished capacity defenses are permissible
  • Insanity must be proven based on previous behavior
  • Which of the following statements about actus reus is true?

    <p>It must always be proven in court.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the Wild Beast Test historically determine regarding mental capacity?

    <p>Persons without understanding or memory should not be punished.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was one of the purposes of the American Law Institute test of Insanity introduced in 1962?

    <p>To eliminate the diminished capacity defenses</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following defenses does not apply to the concepts outlined in the American Law Institute test of Insanity?

    <p>Personality disorders</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does mens rea refer to in the context of criminal law?

    <p>The intent to commit a wrongful act</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a requirement under US standards for NGRI to plead not guilty by reason of insanity?

    <p>The defendant must have suffered from a mental disease at the time of the crime.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which aspect of appreciation is emphasized in the Canadian definition of being unable to understand the nature of one's actions?

    <p>Ability to foresee and measure consequences.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one key factor that differentiates the NCRMD criteria from other mental disorder defenses?

    <p>The offenses must be directly caused and justified by the mental disorder.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What percentage of the prison population was found to be mentally ill, as noted in the content?

    <p>4%</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT a possible disposition under NCRMD in Canadian law?

    <p>Sentencing to life imprisonment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which term refers to the biases in perception regarding the mentally ill and their link to criminal behavior?

    <p>Illusory correlation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens in cases of conditional discharge under NCRMD?

    <p>The individual is released to community supervision with possible revocation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a common misconception about the treatment of mentally ill offenders post-release?

    <p>They are solely transferred to a community health system.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which condition explicitly does NOT qualify as a mental disorder in Canadian law?

    <p>Voluntary intoxication.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the term 'nature and quality' refer to in the context of NCRMD in Canada?

    <p>The physical consequences of an act.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Criminal Responsibility and Mental Disorder

    • Criminal responsibility is determined by the presence of mens rea (guilty mind) and actus reus (guilty act).
    • Mens rea involves the defendant's free will and ability to understand the nature and consequences of their actions.
    • Actus reus refers to the physical act itself, and the mens rea focuses on the intent.
    • A mental disorder can negate mens rea, eliminating the intent to commit the crime.
    • Wild Beast Test: A historical test for sanity, essentially if the accused was acting at the level of a wild animal, infant or brute.
    • M'Naghten Rules (1843): A crucial shift towards a more structured framework. These rules require the defendant to prove they either:
      • Did not understand the nature or quality of their actions, OR
      • Did not understand that their actions were wrong.

    US Law - American Law Institute (ALI) Test of Insanity

    • ALI Test (1962): The test requires for the defense that a person lacks the capacity to appreciate the criminality of their conduct or to conform to the law, due to a mental disease or defect.
    • ALI and Personality Disorders: Personality disorders do not typically qualify as a defense under this test.
    • Modern US Criteria: Several states follow the ALI approach, with some adding "severe" mental illness as a requirement.

    Canadian Law - Not Criminally Responsible on Account of a Mental Disorder (NCRMD)

    • NCRMD: A defense where the person lacks the ability to understand the nature and quality of the act or omission or to know it was wrong because of a mental disorder at the time of the crime. This is the crucial element.
    • Criminal Code of Canada: Defines mental disorder as a disease of the mind, excluding voluntary/involuntary intoxication and transient states (e.g., mania).
    • Personality disorders: The Canadian courts are hesitant to accept personality disorders as grounds for an NCRMD defense, except in rare cases where the disorder directly resulted in the crime.
    • "Nature and Quality" vs. "Knowing it was wrong": "Nature and quality" focuses on the physical consequences of the act; "knowing it was wrong" involves both legal and moral wrongfulness.
    • Causality and Justification: The mental disorder must have caused the criminal act as opposed to simply being present at the time. It must justify the crime.

    NCRMD Dispositions

    • Absolute discharge: No supervision; may still have medical oversight.
    • Conditional discharge: Supervision conditions, revocation possibility.
    • Detention in forensic psychiatric facility: Annual reviews, with a limitation on detention duration.
    • Historical Shifts: The previous criteria often required the accused to be no longer dangerous or ill; current practices recognize some mental disorders are lifelong and manageable.

    Biases and Media Portrayals

    • Biases: Studies indicate potential biases, such as illusory correlation & availability heuristic.
    • Media portrayals: Media depictions can overstate the correlation between mental illness and crime, when in reality, the majority of offenders are not mentally ill.
    • "Great Four-Fold Table of Life": A flawed (overly simple) perspective on recidivism in mentally ill offenders.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the complexities of criminal responsibility and the impact of mental disorders on legal standards. This quiz covers key concepts like mens rea and historical tests for sanity, including the M'Naghten Rules and the ALI Test. Test your understanding of how mental capacity affects legal accountability.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser