Criminal Procedure Quiz
47 Questions
100 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

The defendant should be found guilty of recklessly damaging property because:

  • He violated a statute.
  • He was intoxicated when he damaged the trailer.
  • He consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk. (correct)
  • He was trained to operate the truck.

    • The defendant would most likely be guilty of:

  • None of the listed crimes (correct)
  • Homicide
  • Assault
  • Manslaughter

    • The best reason for finding the bartender not guilty of serving alcohol to a minor would be:

  • Lack of intent to commit the crime.
  • Diligent effort to verify the age.
  • An honest and reasonable mistake as to the minor's age. (correct)
  • Identification was presented.

    • The felon attempting to rob a market should be found guilty of:

    <p>Attempted robbery</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Is the burglar guilty of conspiracy at common law?

    <p>No</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The first robber can be charged with murder due to the actions of the second robber.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The man's statements made to the informant should be excluded at the hearing.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What should the court rule on the driver's motion to suppress the marijuana evidence?

    <p>The defense motion should be denied because the driver was not in custody when she made the statement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How should the court rule on the attorney's pretrial motion to exclude the defendant's confession?

    <p>The defendant's confession should be admitted because he waived his Fifth Amendment privilege after receiving Miranda warnings.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What should the court do if the woman's attorney objects to the introduction of incriminating statements made after she requested an attorney?

    <p>The court should sustain the objection because the police did not honor the woman's request for an attorney.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the most serious crime of which the husband can be convicted after shooting the neighbor?

    <p>The husband can be convicted of murder.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What should the court rule regarding the shooter who fired a rifle and killed a driver while being intoxicated?

    <p>The court should rule that the evidence is sufficient to support a finding of murder.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    If the defendant committed murder by smashing a lead pipe into the victim's head, what degree of murder will he likely be convicted of?

    <p>He will likely be convicted of first degree murder.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the lookout's most promising defense against felony murder charges?

    <p>The lookout's best defense is that the gunman was the only person killed.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Should the court grant the friend’s motion to suppress the marijuana found during police entry?

    <p>The court should grant the motion to suppress because a search warrant was required.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The roommate obtained title to the money through misrepresentation.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What crime did the roommate commit?

    <p>Larceny</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The cottage owner is guilty of arson.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What crime is the cottage owner guilty of?

    <p>Attempted arson</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The woman could retract her confession without any consequences.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What right does the Sixth Amendment provide in a criminal prosecution?

    <p>The right to confront adverse witnesses</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A retrial can occur if a mistrial is requested by the defendant.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstance can a retrial be initiated even if jeopardy has attached?

    <p>When the mistrial is granted at the request of the defendant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Is the evidence found on the woman admissible?

    <p>Yes, the evidence is admissible because the search was valid.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Testimony obtained under a promise of immunity can be used for impeachment.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The defendant can claim that her Fourth Amendment rights have been violated by the seizure of items from the apartment.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How is the court likely to rule on the defendant's motion to suppress the introduction of the marijuana into evidence?

    <p>The court will deny the motion because the search was valid.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one requirement for testimony to be used against a defendant?

    <p>It must not be derived from immunized testimony.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    If someone intended to cause serious harm but unintentionally killed another, what could they be charged with?

    <p>Voluntary manslaughter</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The customer has the right to be free of unreasonable searches, even when on premises subject to a search warrant?

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Does a change of heart after taking someone's property serve as a defense against larceny?

    <p>No, it does not change the fact that the property was taken.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What crime did the roommate commit when obtaining money from the banker?

    <p>Larceny by trick</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What are the possible crimes the defendant could be convicted of?

    <p>Both attempted murder and assault</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the lookout's strongest defense if charged with murder?

    <p>He had withdrawn from the plan before the robbery and killings took place.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The mother in the scenario was forced at gunpoint to commit _______.

    <p>homicide</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the likely verdict if a police officer is charged with battery for shooting a robber?

    <p>Not guilty</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Motions based on the exclusionary rule are permitted in grand jury proceedings.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A passenger in a car can challenge the legality of a search of the vehicle.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of felony murder, under agency theory, which killing would likely lead to the defendant being guilty?

    <p>The store clerk shot by the defendant's accomplice.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under the M'Naghten rule, which statement would entitle a defendant to an acquittal based on insanity?

    <p>The defendant did not understand his actions were real.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What crime has the father most likely committed due to refusing medical care for his ill child?

    <p>Involuntary Manslaughter</p> Signup and view all the answers

    If charged with theft, which theft offense is the man most likely to be convicted of?

    <p>Larceny by trick</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The proprietor can be convicted as an accomplice to larceny for selling a crowbar to a felon.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What crime has the bystander committed regarding the $100?

    <p>Obtaining property by false pretenses.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The homeowner can be charged with attempted arson of the neighbor's home.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the best defense for the drug addict charged with burglary?

    <p>The pawnshop was open for business.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the most serious crime the gang member may be convicted of?

    <p>Attempted Murder</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Reckless Damage to Property

    • Intoxication can lead to a finding of recklessness if it results in actions that disregard substantial risks.
    • Reckless conduct involves a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise.
    • Merely violating statutes relating to untrained operation of equipment does not automatically indicate recklessness.
    • Voluntary intoxication does not serve as a defense for crimes defined by recklessness.
    • Awareness of risk stems from the conscious disregarding of dangers, despite intoxication.

    Self-Defense and Homicide

    • Self-defense justifies the use of deadly force if the person is without fault, faced with unlawful force, and perceives an imminent threat.
    • Verbal harassment does not establish the defendant as the aggressor if it does not meet the legal threshold for provocation.
    • Under the majority view, there is no duty to retreat before using deadly force in self-defense.

    Serving Alcohol to Minors

    • Honest and reasonable mistakes about a material element of the offense can negate criminal liability, particularly if strict liability is abolished.
    • Lack of intent or specific knowledge about the illegal act can be a defense if required mental states are not met.
    • Diligent attempts to ascertain age do not automatically exclude liability; the mistake must be both honest and reasonable.

    Attempted Robbery

    • Attempted robbery occurs when there is a specific intent to commit a robbery and an act that goes beyond mere preparation.
    • Abandonment is not a defense if it is motivated by fear of apprehension or difficulty in completing the crime.
    • The felon’s action of simulating a gun at the market counter demonstrates a substantial step towards committing robbery.

    Conspiracy Liability

    • Conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime, with at least two “guilty minds.”
    • Withdrawal from a conspiracy before the act negates liability for subsequent actions taken by other conspirators.
    • The undercover informant's lack of genuine participation meant there was no valid conspiracy agreement formed.

    Rights During Interrogation

    • The right to counsel applies only to charges that have been formally initiated; it does not extend to unrelated charges.
    • The fifth amendment protections against self-incrimination are not applicable when an informant initiates conversation without being viewed as a police interrogation.
    • Incriminating statements made to an informant without awareness of their status do not violate Miranda rights.

    Evidence Suppression in Traffic Stops

    • Individuals temporarily detained for traffic violations are not considered in custody for Miranda purposes.
    • Statements made during routine interactions do not require Miranda warnings and can support probable cause for searches.
    • The automobile exception allows searches without a warrant if probable cause exists based on the circumstances.### Police Interrogation and Confessions
    • A defendant called his mother for bail but she contacted the family attorney instead, leading to police questioning.
    • The defendant's initial responses were vague and unresponsive during the questioning.
    • The family attorney informed the police of her representation, but the defendant was not made aware of this.
    • Ten minutes into questioning, the defendant confessed to burglary and signed a statement.
    • His confession should be admitted as he validly waived his Miranda rights, having received proper warnings and not requesting an attorney or silence.

    Invocation of Miranda Rights

    • A woman invoked her right to an attorney during interrogation for armed robbery, leading to police ceasing questioning.
    • Several hours later, she was questioned about a different robbery after receiving new Miranda warnings.
    • The court should sustain the objection to admit her statements as the police did not honor her initial request for an attorney.

    Self-Defense and Intoxication

    • A husband killed a neighbor after confronting him with a gun in a fit of rage, likely leading to a murder conviction.
    • Voluntary intoxication does not negate the intent for murder, and his premeditated actions suggest malice aforethought.
    • Claims of self-defense are invalid since he was the aggressor initiating the confrontation.

    Causation and Malice Aforethought

    • A shooter unintentionally killed a driver by firing a rifle through his door while intoxicated.
    • Even though he lacked knowledge of the car's presence, his actions can still be deemed "wanton" behavior, leading to potential murder charges.
    • Voluntary intoxication does not excuse actions deemed reckless or demonstrate a lack of malice.

    First vs. Second Degree Murder

    • The degree of murder depends on the mental state, with premeditation and deliberation required for first-degree murder.
    • The manner of killing and defendant's relationship to the victim can provide context but do not define the murder degree.

    Felony Murder Doctrine

    • A lookout involved in an unsuccessful robbery cannot be charged with felony murder after the gunman, a co-felon, is killed by the clerk.
    • The lookout’s intent to commit robbery establishes the necessary malice for murder, but liability is negated if the co-felon dies due to actions of the robbery victim.

    Search and Seizure

    • Police need a search warrant to search a third party's home when executing an arrest warrant unless exigent circumstances exist.
    • A search resulting in the discovery of items (e.g., marijuana) in a closet without a warrant can be considered unconstitutional, leading to evidence suppression.

    Admissibility of Evidence

    • Evidence obtained from a valid warrantless search can be admissible if probable cause exists.
    • The man's statement about the woman's stash provided probable cause, justifying the search of her belongings regardless of her knowledge of the package contents.

    Implications of Illegal Searches

    • Evidence gathered from illegal searches can lead to the suppression of crucial evidence at trial, highlighting the importance of warrant requirements.
    • A thorough understanding of exceptions to warrant requirements is crucial for the legality and admissibility of evidence in court.### Fourth Amendment and Standing
    • A defendant can claim a Fourth Amendment violation if they have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the place searched.
    • Reasonable expectation of privacy can arise from ownership, occupancy, or being an overnight guest.
    • Standing to contest a search requires the claimant's own reasonable expectation of privacy to be violated.
    • A suppression hearing ruled a search invalid allows the defendant to challenge the seizure of evidence.
    • A search conducted with consent from a person who appears to have authority is valid.
    • Consent must come from someone with apparent authority and cannot exceed the scope of consent given.
    • The officer's belief about the girlfriend's authority was deemed reasonable, making the search valid.
    • Even if authorities believe a person consented to a search, the individual's Fourth Amendment rights must still be respected.

    Search Warrants and Individual Rights

    • A warrant is necessary to conduct most searches; officers cannot search persons on the premises without a warrant naming them.
    • In Ybarra v. Illinois, the Supreme Court affirmed that mere presence at a location under search does not negate an individual’s rights.
    • Searches incidental to an arrest require probable cause, which was not present in the given scenario.

    Larceny and Intent

    • Larceny is defined as the taking and carrying away of another's property with the intent to permanently deprive them of it.
    • A change of intention after committing an act of larceny does not negate the crime.
    • Taking property under false pretenses (larceny by trick) involves misrepresentation that induces consent.

    Burglary and Attempted Arson

    • Burglary involves unlawful entry into a dwelling with intent to commit a felony.
    • Ownership of the property does not protect the owner from burglary charges if they invade another's right of occupancy.
    • Attempted arson occurs when there is intent to commit arson alongside an act that comes close to completing the crime but fails.

    Criminal Conspiracy and Confessions

    • Interlocking confessions can strengthen the prosecution’s case but also raise issues of individual rights if one attempts to retract their statement.
    • The admissibility of confessions can be scrutinized, especially if one defendant claims their confession was false.
    • Joint trials may use confessions against all defendants, highlighting the complexities of conspiracy cases.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Test your knowledge on criminal procedure, specifically regarding search warrants and arrests. This quiz covers the legal standards required for police actions in relation to third parties and consent. Understand the nuances of probable cause and the implications of informants' disclosures.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser