Criminal Procedure Quiz
10 Questions
4 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

How is jurisdiction over the person of an accused acquired?

  • By submission to the jurisdiction of the court (correct)
  • By questioning the judicial authority
  • By waiving objection to court's jurisdiction
  • By apprehension with a warrant
  • When did the petitioner question the judicial authority of the courts over his person?

  • Never within the six-year period (correct)
  • Before the justice of the peace court
  • Before the Court of Appeals
  • Before the Court of First Instance
  • Where was the petitioner brought before the bar of justice?

  • Justice of the Peace Court (correct)
  • Court of Appeals
  • Court of First Instance
  • Supreme Court
  • Which court rendered the decision in the case at bar?

    <p>Court of Appeals</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How many years had transpired until the Court of Appeals rendered its decision?

    <p>6 years</p> Signup and view all the answers

    True or false: The preliminary inquiry determines whether the offender should be held for trial or be released.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    True or false: The determination of probable cause for the issuance of a warrant of arrest is made by the investigating prosecutor.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    True or false: The preliminary investigation proper ascertains whether there is reasonable ground to believe that the accused is guilty of the offense charged.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    True or false: The preliminary inquiry and the preliminary investigation proper are the same thing.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    True or false: The function of the investigating prosecutor is to determine probable cause for the issuance of a warrant of arrest.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Preliminary Inquiry vs. Preliminary Investigation

    • Preliminary inquiry is responsible for establishing probable cause necessary for issuing a warrant of arrest.
    • Preliminary investigation operates to determine if the accused should stand trial or be released.
    • Judges conduct preliminary inquiries to assess probable cause for arrest warrants.
    • Investigating prosecutors carry out preliminary investigations to decide on reasonable grounds for believing in the accused's guilt.
    • The distinction between these processes was highlighted in the case AAA v. Carbonell (G.R. No. 171465, June 8, 2007).
    • A recent case reiterates the difference between these two legal processes, emphasizing their separate functions.

    Key Functions

    • Preliminary Inquiry: Judge evaluates probable cause for arrest.
    • Preliminary Investigation: Prosecutor assesses evidence to determine guilt or release.
    • Understanding both processes is crucial for legal proceedings regarding arrest and trial preparation.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Quiz: Understanding Criminal Procedure - Jurisdiction over the Person of the Accused

    More Like This

    Legal Proceedings Quiz
    42 questions
    Legal Proceedings Quiz
    18 questions
    Criminal Law Fundamentals Quiz
    45 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser