Criminal Law: Fighting Words and Breach of Peace

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is a necessary condition for an officer to arrest a suspect based on language under F.S.§877.03?

The suspect's words must be heard by at least 5 people

The suspect's words must inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace (correct)

The suspect Must Use Profanity

The suspect's words must be directed at a law enforcement officer

What is an example of language that could lead to an arrest under F.S.§877.03?

Yelling 'fire' in a crowded building (correct)

Using abusive language in a private setting

Cursing at a bank and its assistant manager

Profanity directed at a law enforcement officer

What is the rule regarding language directed at a law enforcement officer under F.S.§877.03?

It is always considered 'fighting words'

It is considered 'fighting words' only if it incites an immediate breach of the peace (correct)

It is considered 'fighting words' only if it is accompanied by physical action

It is never considered 'fighting words'

What is the key factor in determining whether language can lead to an arrest under F.S.§877.03?

The context in which the language was used Signup and view all the answers

What is the result of using language that tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace?

It can lead to an arrest under F.S.§877.03 Signup and view all the answers

What type of words may lead to arrest under F.S' §877.03?

Fighting words that incite immediate breach of the peace Signup and view all the answers

In which circumstance can false words lead to arrest under F.S' §877.03?

When they create a clear and present danger of harm Signup and view all the answers

What is a critical factor for an officer to consider when determining language that warrants arrest?

The potential for the language to incite immediate violence Signup and view all the answers

What is essential evidence needed to consider an arrest for language under F.S.§877.03?

The crowd's reaction indicating a potential breach of peace Signup and view all the answers

Which aspect is critical in assessing whether language can jeopardize public peace?

Evidence of crowd response to the language Signup and view all the answers

For an arrest to occur under F.S.§877.03, which of the following must be demonstrated?

The language provoked an imminent threat to order Signup and view all the answers

In terms of arrest based on verbal conduct, which detail is not essential?

The clarity of the statements made Signup and view all the answers

What element strengthens the case for arrest based on language under F.S.§877.03?

Active engagement of the crowd with the defendant's speech Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Disorderly Conduct and Language

To make an arrest for violating F.S.§877.03 based on language, an officer must observe the suspect using "fighting words" that inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
"Fighting words" include words known to be false, reporting some physical hazard, and creating a clear and present danger of bodily harm to others (e.g., yelling "fire" in a crowded building).

Cases and Rulings

In State v. Saunders (1976), the court ruled that an officer can arrest a suspect based on language that tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
In Smith v. State (2007), the court ruled that using profanity and cursing at a bank and its assistant manager was not sufficient to support an arrest for disorderly conduct, as there was no evidence of inciting an immediate breach of the peace.
In Barry v. State (2006), the court ruled that even if language is directed at a law enforcement officer, it is not sufficient to support an arrest for disorderly conduct without evidence of inciting an immediate breach of the peace.

Key Factors

For a conviction of disorderly conduct, there must be evidence that the crowd is actually responding to the defendant's words in some way that threatens to breach the peace.
Mere observation or curiosity by onlookers is insufficient to support a conviction.
Verbal conduct alone, without physical action, may not be sufficient to support a conviction for disorderly conduct.

Legal Standards for Arrest under F.S. §877.03

Officers can arrest individuals based solely on verbal communication, specifically "fighting words."
"Fighting words" are defined as those that inherently provoke injury or incite an immediate breach of the peace.
The context of the words plays a crucial role; they must create a clear and present danger of harm to others.
False statements about physical hazards can lead to arrest if they pose a significant risk to others' safety.
The concept emphasizes the impact of language over physical actions in certain legal contexts.

Disorderly Conduct and Legal Standards

Defendant repeatedly instructed an officer to mind her "own f ing business" during an altercation.
This confrontation escalated as the defendant approached the officer, shouting obscenities and gesturing aggressively.
Traffic around an elementary school slowed to observe the scene, but no motorist physically intervened or acted in response to the defendant's behavior.
The Court determined that mere observation by bystanders does not constitute sufficient grounds for a conviction of disorderly conduct.

Key Legal Precedents

Miller v. State: Conviction overturned due to aggressive speech directed at an officer, emphasizing that conduct must be more than mere words.
L.A.T. v. State: Shouting about police treatment in a public space was not enough for a disorderly conduct conviction; the conduct was solely verbal.
F.S. §877.03: To charge under this statute, evidence must show "fighting words" or false statements likely to incite immediate physical conflict or danger.

Contextual Considerations

Smith v. State: Defendant's profanity at a bank did not warrant arrest; bystanders showed either curiosity or annoyance rather than a threat to peace.
Barry v. State: Even directed insults at law enforcement do not alone satisfy requirements for disorderly conduct charges.
Words must demonstrably cause others to react in ways that threaten the peace, not just evoke passive observation or mild disturbance.

Essential Elements of a Conviction

Language must be aggressive enough to inflict injury or incite imminent violence.
For disorderly conduct to be substantiated, there's a need for evidence showing bystander involvement or reactions indicating a breach of the peace.
Verbal confrontations, when unaccompanied by physical actions, often lack the legal grounds for prosecution under disorderly conduct statutes.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Learn about the laws and regulations surrounding fighting words and breach of peace, including the criteria for arrest and notable court cases. Legal Guideline #6