Criminal Law Definitions and Concepts

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which of the following is NOT a necessary element to create a valid criminal law?

  • A clear statement of what is illegal (prohibition)
  • A description of the perpetrator's intent (correct)
  • A punishment for breaking the law (penalty)
  • A demonstration of harm to society (public evil)

Why might a law criminalizing "offensive behavior" be struck down as unconstitutional?

  • It infringes on the right to free speech, as "offensive behavior" is subjective and can be interpreted widely.
  • It does not specify a penalty for "offensive behavior," making enforcement impractical.
  • It lacks a clear definition of what constitutes "offensive behavior," leading to arbitrary enforcement. (correct)
  • It violates the principle of separation of powers, allowing the judiciary to define criminal behavior.

Which of the following accurately describes the difference between substantive and procedural law?

  • Substantive law focuses on the rights and responsibilities of individuals, while procedural law concerns the procedures for resolving legal disputes.
  • Substantive law defines what is a crime and its punishment, while procedural law outlines how laws are enforced. (correct)
  • Substantive law defines the process of enforcing laws, while procedural law defines the content of the laws.
  • Substantive law is created by the legislature, while procedural law is created by the judiciary.

According to the content, which entity has the ultimate authority to create criminal laws in Canada?

<p>The Federal Government (Parliament) (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is an example of a procedural law related to assault?

<p>The police must obtain a warrant before arresting someone for assault. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the "demonstration of public evil" element in creating a criminal law?

<p>It proves that the act in question is harmful to society and warrants legal intervention. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The statement "Failing to act can be a crime if there is a legal duty to act" refers to which concept in criminal law?

<p>Omission (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is an example of a situation where a provincial law might conflict with a federal law?

<p>A province enacts a law requiring stricter penalties for theft than those outlined in the federal Criminal Code. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the concept of 'due process' in law?

<p>The legal requirement that the state must respect all legal rights owed to a person. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a primary concern regarding 'vague' laws?

<p>They reduce legal certainty and may lead to arbitrary application by law enforcement. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

How does 'specific deterrence' differ from 'general deterrence'?

<p>Specific deterrence focuses on preventing an individual from re-offending, while general deterrence aims to discourage the public at large. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which entity holds the ultimate power to create criminal laws in Canada?

<p>The Parliament of Canada, under the Constitution Act of 1867. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the main difference between substantive and procedural criminal law?

<p>Substantive law defines crimes and punishments, while procedural law governs how laws are enforced. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a consequence of a provincial law conflicting with a federal law?

<p>The federal law automatically prevails under the doctrine of paramountcy. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary role of judicial 'interpretative pluralism'?

<p>To consider different perspectives in legal decisions. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the process of creating a law, defining prohibited conduct is referred to as the:

<p>Prohibition (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best defines 'demonstration of public evil' in the context of criminal law?

<p>Behavior that is significantly harmful to society, even including certain omissions. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which case established an 8-month guideline for reasonable delays in criminal proceedings?

<p>R v. Askov (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the main focus of the 'reasonableness standard' in administrative law?

<p>Determining if a decision is justifiable and rational in the given context. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a principle of criminal law?

<p>Secrecy (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the provided text, who has the authority to repeal laws?

<p>Parliament (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of R v. Sullivan, what issue concerning individual responsibility was a central focus?

<p>Automatism as a defense due to extreme intoxication. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary purpose of the Oakes Test, as outlined in the text?

<p>To ensure limitations on Charter rights serve a substantial and proportionate purpose. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Do corporations have legal standing, and if so what rights can they invoke?

<p>Corporations have legal standing, they can invoke rights like Section 8 (Protection against Unreasonable Search &amp; Seizure). (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was established as part of federal criminal power regarding pollution?

<p>Pollution can be regulated under criminal law. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the significant outcome of R v. Sullivan regarding extreme intoxication?

<p>Extreme intoxication can only be a defense in rare cases. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was determined in R v. Askov regarding trial delays?

<p>Excessive delays violate fundamental rights. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which test was established to evaluate the limitation of Charter rights in R v. Oakes?

<p>The Oakes Test. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What gives courts the authority to remove laws?

<p>Parliament can repeal laws, and courts can declare them unconstitutional. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Reasonableness standard in administrative law consider?

<p>Whether the decision was logically sound given the circumstances. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What core principle of criminal law ensures fairness in legal proceedings?

<p>Due Process. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which principle ensures that laws apply equally to everyone?

<p>Rule of Law. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary purpose of the 'notwithstanding clause' (Section 33) in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

<p>To allow the federal government to override fundamental rights in specific cases. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the content, which of the following is NOT considered a fundamental freedom protected under Section 2 of the Charter?

<p>Freedom of association (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the significance of the 'reasonable limits' clause (Section 1) in the Charter?

<p>It allows the government to restrict rights and freedoms based on a compelling public interest. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the concept of 'Stare Decisis' in the context of Canadian law?

<p>It ensures that legal decisions are consistent and predictable, based on previous rulings. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

The content states that 'laws must be clear' as part of the principle of the Rule of Law. What does this mean in practice?

<p>Laws should be easily understood and accessible to all citizens. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a component of Section 6 of the Charter, relating to 'Mobility Rights'?

<p>The right to vote in any Canadian election (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of Section 7 of the Charter, what is meant by 'liberty'?

<p>The right to move freely, associate with others, and marry. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of 'Habeus Corpus' as outlined in Section 10 of the Charter?

<p>To provide a mechanism for challenging the legality of detention. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following principles is NOT directly related to the 'Rule of Law' as discussed in the content?

<p>The right to change the law through democratic processes (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Subsection 6(4) of the Charter permit?

<p>The government to implement affirmative action programs to redress imbalances in employment. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the purpose of the Sunset Clause?

<p>To allow laws to expire automatically unless renewed. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which legal principle ensures protection against unlawful detention?

<p>Habeas Corpus (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Reverse Onus principle entail?

<p>The burden of proof shifts to the accused in specific cases. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What are the criteria for the 3-Part Test established in the Keegstra Case?

<p>Pressing purpose, rational connection, and proportional impact. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does Deontic Language refer to in legal contexts?

<p>Language that dictates legal obligations. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Borderline cases in law refer to what?

<p>Cases that fall into gray areas with ambiguous laws. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is characterized as a vague law?

<p>A law that fails to provide clear and understandable guidance. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the function of the Notwithstanding Clause (Section 33)?

<p>To allow legislation that overrides certain rights for five years. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Penalty

A legal principle that establishes punishment for a crime or offense.

Demonstration of Public Evil

Behavior that harms society. This includes omissions (failure to act when legally required, like not reporting a crime).

Reasonableness Standard

A legal standard used to determine if a decision is reasonable given the circumstances.

Correctness Standard

A legal standard used to determine if a decision is strictly in line with existing legal principles.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Due Process

The principle that legal processes should be fair and protect individuals from arbitrary punishment.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Rule of Law

The principle that laws apply equally to everyone, regardless of their status.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Legal Personality

The principle that corporations, like individuals, have legal rights and can be held accountable in the same way.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Charter Rights for Corporations

Corporations can invoke certain constitutional rights, such as protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Criminal Law

A set of rules that defines actions prohibited by the state and sets out the punishments for breaking those rules.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deterrence Theory

The belief that punishment discourages individuals from committing crimes.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Vagueness in Law

A law is vague if it doesn't clearly define what actions are prohibited, making it hard for people to understand and follow.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Substantive Criminal Law

A law that outlines what actions are considered crimes and how these crimes are punished.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Procedural Law

The legal rules governing how laws are enforced, ensuring fairness in the legal process. Includes things like the burden of proof and the rights of the accused.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Federal Criminal Law Power

The highest authority in Canada for creating criminal laws.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Judicial Discretion

The ability of judges to interpret and apply laws based on different perspectives and considerations.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Omissions in Criminal Law

Failing to act when there is a legal duty to do so can be considered a crime. Like, not reporting a crime when you see it.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Stare Decisis

The principle that courts should follow previous rulings in similar cases.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Oakes Test

A legal test used to determine if a law limiting Charter rights is justified.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Judicial Review

The ability of courts to overturn or strike down laws that violate the Constitution.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Notwithstanding Clause (Section 33)

A legal document that gives Parliament or provinces the power to override certain Charter rights for up to five years.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Habeas Corpus

A legal principle that ensures individuals are not unlawfully detained. It includes rights like seeking legal counsel and challenging detention in court.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Deontic Language

Legal language that focuses on obligations and duties. It uses terms like 'shall,' 'must,' and 'is required to,' defining what is legally expected.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Borderline Cases

Cases that fall into grey areas where the law is unclear or open to interpretation based on context.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Reverse Onus

A legal principle where the burden of proof is shifted to the accused to prove their innocence, rather than the prosecution proving guilt.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Keegstra Case & 3-Part Test

A three-part test used to evaluate if a limitation on Charter rights is justified under section 1 (reasonable limits). It considers if the law has a pressing purpose, is rationally connected to the goal, and is proportionate in its impact.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Notwithstanding Clause (Section 33)

This clause allows Parliament or provinces to temporarily override certain Charter rights for up to five years. Think of it as a temporary override switch for Charter rights.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Judicial Interpretation

The process judges use to interpret laws in light of changing values and societal beliefs.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Public Indecency (Criminal Code Section 173)

Public indecency is a summary offense defined as an act performed in a public place with the intent to insult or offend, regardless of whether the person thought they were being observed.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Section 1 - 'Reasonable Limits' Clause

The 'Reasonable Limits' clause of the Charter allows for restrictions on freedoms and rights when necessary to achieve a greater societal goal.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Section 33 - 'Notwithstanding Clause'

The 'Notwithstanding Clause' allows the federal government to pass laws that violate fundamental rights by overriding the Charter.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fundamental Freedoms (Charter Section 2)

Guaranteed freedoms and rights include religion, thought, belief, expression, opinion, and freedom of the press.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Democratic Rights (Charter Sections 3, 4, 5)

These rights, including the right to vote, participate in government, and associate with others, cannot be overridden by the 'Notwithstanding Clause'.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Mobility Rights (Charter Section 6)

This right guarantees a person's ability to move freely within Canada, including entering, leaving, living, and earning a living.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Subsection 6 (4) of the Charter - Affirmative Action

This section permits affirmative action programs to address imbalances in employment, promoting equality and opportunity.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Criminal Law Definitions and Concepts

  • Criminal Law: A system of laws defining prohibited actions and punishments.
  • Due Process: Ensures fair legal proceedings, protecting individuals' rights.
  • Deterrence Theory: Punishment discourages criminal behavior.
  • Specific Deterrence: Preventing a specific individual from reoffending.
  • General Deterrence: Warning to society about potential consequences.
  • Federal Criminal Law Power: Only the Canadian Parliament can create criminal laws.

Vagueness and Vague Laws

  • Vagueness: Laws unclear about prohibited actions; difficulty for citizens to understand and comply.
  • Criteria for Vagueness: Fails to clearly define actions, lacks procedural clarity, and can lead to inconsistent enforcement.
  • Effects: Reduces legal certainty, increases discretion, and may lead to unconstitutional challenges.

Substantive vs. Procedural Law

  • Substantive Law: Defines crimes and punishments (e.g., assault).
  • Procedural Law: Governs how laws are enforced (e.g., legal processes).

Federal Criminal Law Power

  • Ultimate Power: Parliament creates laws, courts interpret and enforce them.
  • Judicial Discretion: Judges use multiple perspectives when interpreting laws.

Jurisdiction: Federal vs. Provincial Powers

  • Federal: Creates criminal laws.
  • Provincial: Creates regulatory laws.
  • Conflict Resolution: Federal laws supersede provincial laws if they conflict.

Necessary Elements of Creating Law

  • Prohibition: Defines prohibited actions.
  • Penalty: Establishes punishments.
  • Demonstration of Public Evil: Demonstrates harm to society.

Key Case Studies

  • Syncrude v Canada: Focuses on pollution regulations, whether environmental harm is a public issue.
  • R v. Sullivan: Examines extreme intoxication as a defense; highlights the balance between individual responsibility and constitutional rights.
  • R v. Askov: Examines the constitutional right to a timely trial.
  • R v. Oakes: Establishes the Oakes test to evaluate the proportionality of limiting charter rights.
  • Legal Personality: Corporations possess some rights similar to individuals.
  • Charter Rights for Corporations: Corporations can invoke certain Charter rights but with limitations.
  • Sunset Clause: Laws expire after a set period without renewal.
  • Notwithstanding Clause: Allows governments to temporarily override certain Charter rights.
  • Habeas Corpus: A legal principle guaranteeing protection against arbitrary detention.
  • Deontic Language: Legal obligations in language with words like "shall" and "must".
  • Reverse Onus: Changes the burden of proof to the accused.

Standard for Review in Administrative Law

  • Reasonableness: Was the decision justified within the circumstances?
  • Correctness: Was the decision legally correct?
  • Courts generally uphold administrative decisions unless those decisions are unreasonable.

Principles of Criminal Law

  • Due Process: Fair legal procedures.
  • Rule of Law: Equal application of laws.
  • Predictability: Consistent legal outcomes.
  • Transparency: Open and understandable legal processes.
  • Corporations can claim certain rights.
  • Limitations on rights of corporations compared to individuals.
  • Sunset Clause: Laws expire after a set period.
  • Notwithstanding Clause: Temporarily overrides certain charter rights.

Other Key Concepts

  • Reasonable Limits Clause: Allows limitations on rights in a democratic society.
  • Corporations and Constitutional Laws: Corporations possess legal rights.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Canadian Criminal Law PDF

More Like This

Mediation in Criminal Law
24 questions
Criminal Law Process Overview
45 questions

Criminal Law Process Overview

WellManneredQuantum5482 avatar
WellManneredQuantum5482
Criminal Law Overview (Textbook 20-232)
24 questions
Crime and Criminal Law Module Quiz
24 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser