Criminal Law Concepts Quiz
42 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which of the following best describes 'Actus Reus'?

  • The specific act or omission that constitutes the physical element of a crime. (correct)
  • The determination of whether the accused is capable of understanding the nature and consequences of their actions.
  • The mental intent to commit a crime, considering the offender's motives and beliefs.
  • The legal responsibility to act in a certain way, regardless of intent or ability.

    • What is the significance of 'Mens Rea' in criminal law?

  • It ensures that the accused understood the legal implications of their actions.
  • It proves that the accused had a guilty mind and intended to commit the crime. (correct)
  • It demonstrates that there was a pre-existing relationship between the accused and the victim.
  • It establishes the severity of the punishment based on the victim's suffering.

    • In the context of criminal law, what does 'causation' refer to?

  • The presence of multiple offenders in a criminal act.
  • The psychological reasons behind an offender's actions.
  • The legal obligation to compensate the victim for damages caused.
  • The link between the accused's actions and the resulting harm or crime. (correct)

    • In the case of an accused raising a point that requires jury consideration, what is the general consensus if there's a lack of evidentiary foundation?

    <p>It typically does not proceed before the jury if there is no real evidentiary foundation. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the primary defense presented by the respondent in Regina v Parks?

    <p>Automatism caused by sleepwalking. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the provided context, what was the ultimate outcome for Morgan?

    <p>Convicted at trial because the provided evidence didn't support the defense's position. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the initial verdict in the trial of Regina v Parks?

    <p>Acquittal on the grounds of automatism. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Gilligan JA's conclusion, what is required for disease of the mind?

    <p>Illness, a disorder or abnormal condition. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the R v Tutton case, what was a key element that the Court of Appeal found lacking in the original trial?

    <p>The trial judge's instruction to the jury on all elements of the case. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the COA rely on to uphold the appeal?

    <p>The definition of &quot;disease of the mind&quot;. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of the R v Tutton case involving the parents' faith-based decision, what critical legal question arose regarding negligence?

    <p>Whether negligence resulting in death constitutes some form of mens rea. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the context, why did the trial judge's approach in the R v Tutton case face criticism?

    <p>The judge didn't apply requirements of advertence or knowledge of risk. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did Parks present as his defense?

    <p>He was sleepwalking at the time. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the provided text, what specific condition must be present for the defense of duress to be considered?

    <p>The threat must involve immediate death or grievous bodily harm from a person who is present. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following offences explicitly disqualify an individual from using the defense of duress, according to the provided text?

    <p>Arson (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Paquette, what role did the accused play that led to their claim of duress?

    <p>They acted as the driver under alleged duress. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Lord Wilberforce, under what condition should the defense of duress be available to a person charged as an accomplice?

    <p>If duress is available to someone who aided and abetted in murder, it should be available to someone made a party to the offence by virtue. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the central issue in Regina v Campbell and Mlynarchuk that the court had to determine?

    <p>Whether the performance in question was considered immoral. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Lavallee, what was the central question regarding 'reasonable grounds' for self-defense?

    <p>Whether shooting the deceased was warranted based on 'reasonable grounds', considering both objective and subjective components. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Lavallee, what impact did the battered woman syndrome have on the self-defense claim?

    <p>It could be considered in assessing the self-defense claim. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of R v Paquette, what is the significance of Section 21 of the Criminal Code?

    <p>It defines the parties to an offence, including those who aid or abet its commission. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Criminal Code 34, under what conditions is causing death or harm in repelling an assault justified?

    <p>If the individual reasonably apprehends death or grievous bodily harm and believes they cannot otherwise preserve themselves. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Lavallee, what was Dr. Shane's assessment of the appellant's actions?

    <p>The shooting was a desperate act by a woman who thought she would be killed. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the initial outcome of the R v Lavallee trial, and how was it subsequently changed?

    <p>The appellant was initially acquitted by a jury, but the verdict was overturned by the Court of Appeal and sent back for retrial. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Paquette, what specific facts led to the appeal?

    <p>An innocent bystander killed by a bullet during a bank robbery. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In R v Paquette, what was Simard and Clermont’s initial plea regarding the non-capital Murder charge?

    <p>Simard and Clermont pleaded guilty. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the provided material, what is a key distinction between criminal and private law regarding the pursuit of a wrongdoer?

    <p>Criminal law involves the state taking a personal interest in prosecution, whereas private law provides victims with resources but leaves the pursuit largely to them. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of the TJ case, what was the central legal issue concerning mens rea?

    <p>Whether the intention to commit a different crime could satisfy the mens rea requirement for the charged offense. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The principle of 'strict liability' is exemplified in the TJ case by which element?

    <p>His ignorance of the victim's death not absolving him of liability for indecent interference. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the provided material, what is the significance of harm in determining criminality?

    <p>Harm is a necessary condition for a tort but not always for a crime. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Bronaugh suggest about the role of victims in criminal prosecutions?

    <p>Victims testify on behalf of the Crown, supporting the state's prosecution efforts. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the provided content, which factor is identified for the criminalization of ‘harmless immoralities’?

    <p>Moral disgust (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Bronaugh's essay, what term is used in Scots law in place of 'plaintiff'?

    <p>Pursuer (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following options BEST describes the relationship between harm and criminal law, as discussed?

    <p>Harm is a significant factor in criminal law, but other considerations, such as moral offensiveness, can also lead to criminalization. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is the most accurate description of the 'rational moral agent' concept in the context of criminal accountability?

    <p>An individual who understands the wrongfulness of their actions and can appreciate the moral judgments of others. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the significance of 'Regina v Parks' in legal discussions about criminal liability?

    <p>It provides an example where sleepwalking negated criminal accountability due to lack of rational control. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what is conceptualism in the judicial context?

    <p>The circumstance where judges feel compelled to make decisions they'd rather avoid due to legal concepts. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the requirement for an act to be considered an assault, according to the content?

    <p>It must involve a positive act, and cannot be the result of an accident. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the key distinction between a 'formalist' and a 'realist' approach to judicial decision-making, as suggested in the content?

    <p>Formalists strictly adhere to the 'rule of law', while realists believe judges make decisions based on personal views. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does 'absolute liability' refer to in the context of criminal and corporate responsibility?

    <p>Liability that exists regardless of intention or mental state, based solely on the act itself. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which scenario exemplifies a situation where 'absolute liability' might be applied?

    <p>A person speeds in a car, unaware that they are exceeding the speed limit. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what fundamental principle is central to the concept of criminal accountability?

    <p>Those convicted of crimes should be held accountable for their actions, recognizing that they are human beings. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Flashcards

    Onus of Proof

    The responsibility of the Crown to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Actus Reus

    The physical act or omission that constitutes a crime, must be voluntary.

    Mens Rea

    The mental state or intent of the accused when committing the crime.

    Causation

    The relationship between the act and the outcome, essential for certain offenses.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Automatism

    A defense claiming the accused was not aware of their actions due to a temporary state.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Disease of the Mind

    A condition that affects mental functioning leading to insanity pleas in court.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Regina v Parks

    A legal case where sleepwalking was used as a defense against murder charges.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Retribution in Law

    The principle of punishment as a form of revenge or retribution against criminals.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Criminal Act

    A definite act required for a crime, even if negligent inaction can lead to charges.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Accountability in Criminality

    Theory that individuals convicted of crimes should be responsible for their actions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Capacity for Criminal Liability

    The requirement that a person must be capable of being held accountable under law.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Rational Moral Agent

    A person who understands right from wrong and is accountable for their actions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Absolute Liability

    Legal principle where a person is held liable without fault or intention.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Conceptualism in Law

    Judges following their own desires, potentially conflicting with unbiased legal judgments.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Duty to Rescue

    A legal obligation to assist others when responsible for their safety.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Indecent Interference

    A charge for inappropriate behavior that violates legal standards.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Strict Liability

    Liability that does not require proof of intent.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Prosecution

    The legal party that initiates a case against an accused criminal.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Harm Principle

    The idea that acts must cause harm to be considered criminal.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Moral Offensiveness

    Conduct that is deemed wrong due to societal moral standards.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Torts

    Civil wrongs that cause harm to others but are not criminal.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Duress Defense

    A legal defense excusing an offense due to immediate threats of harm or death.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Accomplice Liability

    An accomplice can potentially use duress as a defense if coerced by threats.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Excluded Offenses

    Certain crimes like murder and arson cannot use the duress defense.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Paquette Case

    A legal case affirming that duress can apply to accomplices under certain conditions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Immoral Performance

    A legal concept questioning the morality of public acts, such as stripping.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Accused's evidence before jury

    If the accused raises a defense, the issue goes to the jury unless there's no evidentiary foundation.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Morgan case conviction

    Morgan was convicted as his evidence did not support his claim of consent.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    R v Tutton negligence case

    Split court decision on criminal negligence concerning a child's diabetes treatment.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Criminal negligence definition

    Omission of duties leading to harm; not requiring subjective mens rea.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Objective foreseeability in negligence

    Negligence must contain foreseeability despite the defendant's beliefs or intentions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Battered Woman Syndrome

    A psychological condition that describes the effects of prolonged abuse on women, influencing their perceptions of self-defense.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Self-Defence

    The justification for using force to protect oneself from imminent harm or threat.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Criminal Code Section 34

    Legal provision allowing harm in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of imminent death or grievous harm.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Appeal Outcome

    The result of a legal challenge, such as restoring a previous acquittal or calling for a retrial.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Reasonable Apprehension

    A belief that a threat is imminent, justifying self-defense actions.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Jointly Charged

    When multiple parties are charged together for their involvement in a crime.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Criminal Code Section 21

    Law stating everyone involved in a crime, directly or indirectly, is liable for that crime.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Objective and Subjective Components

    Aspects considered when assessing the reasonableness of self-defense; objective is universal, subjective is personal.

    Signup and view all the flashcards

    Study Notes

    Criminal Law Study Notes

    • Criminal law is considered public law, the state prosecutes the case.
    • Criminal law is the most severe way society expresses disapproval of conduct.
    • Criminal offenses involve actus reus (the act) and mens rea (the guilty mind).
    • Actus reus is a positive act or omission, a voluntary act or failure to act.
    • Mens rea varies by crime, ranging from intention to recklessness.
    • An accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty. The state has the burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
    • The doctrine of strict construction interprets the criminal code narrowly, resolving ambiguities in favor of the accused.
    • Common law defenses exist, such as duress, where an accused was forced to commit a crime to avoid harm.
    • Some offenses are strict liability (no mens rea required) and some are considered True Crimes.
    • A crime has to be proven having both Mens Rea and Actus Reus before the accused can be found guilty.
    • For a criminal act not to be committed, there needs to be a lack of intent.
    • A conviction may be dismissed for lack of intent to commit the crime.
    • The Crown may not proceed with a case if the key witness is unwilling to testify; they can't force them to.
    • A person can be held responsible for the consequences of their actions; even if they did not intend the harm, but a certain amount of foresight may be required in some cases.
    • The issue of mens rea (guilty mind) has been a significant factor in many criminal law cases.
    • The subjective beliefs and knowledge held by the accused are factors considered in determining mens rea in certain circumstances.
    • A mistaken belief or misunderstanding may be a valid defence in a certain circumstance as long as the evidence leads to that conclusion.
    • The courts look to objective factors when determining the reasonableness of an alleged defense.
    • The test for whether the actus reus and mens rea are present is situational and case-specific.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Philosophy 2080 Criminal Law-2 PDF

    Description

    Test your knowledge on fundamental concepts of criminal law, including 'Actus Reus', 'Mens Rea', and significant cases like Regina v Parks and R v Tutton. This quiz reviews key legal principles and case outcomes that are essential for understanding criminal liability and defenses.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser