Podcast
Questions and Answers
What is the primary basis for D's liability in complicity?
What is the term for a person who performs or causes the AR of the substantive criminal offence with the necessary MR?
What is the requirement for MR in accessory liability, as considered in R v Jogee?
In a situation where A and B both stab C, and the combined effect of the two wounds is that C dies, what is A and B's liability?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the term for a principal who causes the AR of an offence through an innocent agent?
Signup and view all the answers
What happens when two people have different MR for the same offence?
Signup and view all the answers
If A gives B a knife telling him to stab C to death, which one of the following is most correct?
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Gianetto, what was the court's decision?
Signup and view all the answers
If A and B attack C simultaneously, but without intending to assist each other, what is the outcome?
Signup and view all the answers
If A gives B poison, telling B it is medicine for B's child, and B gives it to the child, who is guilty of murder?
Signup and view all the answers
What is required for A to be convicted as an accessory to robbery?
Signup and view all the answers
If A and B jointly commit a robbery, what is the prosecution's burden?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the Act that codifies complicity?
Signup and view all the answers
If A supplies B with a hammer, and B uses it to kill C, what is A's liability?
Signup and view all the answers
What is required to convict B of murder as principal offender?
Signup and view all the answers
If A and B jointly commit a crime, what is the general rule?
Signup and view all the answers
What is required for complicity liability in terms of the defendant's mens rea?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the circumstance AR for complicity?
Signup and view all the answers
What is required for ulterior MR in terms of the principal conduct?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the difference between aiding and abetting?
Signup and view all the answers
What is required for complicity by omission?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the MR requirement for complicity by omission?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the result requirement for complicity?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the difference between complicity and procuring?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the circumstance MR for complicity?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the requirement for encouragement in complicity?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the actus reus of secondary liability?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the mens rea required for secondary liability?
Signup and view all the answers
In what case was the doctrine of joint enterprise abolished?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the main issue with the doctrine of joint enterprise?
Signup and view all the answers
In what scenario can a defendant be liable for procuring an offence despite the principal not committing the offence?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the difference between a principal and an accessory?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the significance of the 'free, voluntary and informed choice' of the skeleton army in Beatty v Gillbanks?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the requirement for the defendant's liability in cases like Cogan and Leak and R v Millward?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the significance of R v Gnango?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the exception to the rule that innocent agents are not procured?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the significance of R v Powell and Daniels?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the mens rea required for the defendant to be liable as a secondary party?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the outcome of D's conviction in Cogan and Leak?
Signup and view all the answers
What was the issue with the tractor-trailer in R v Millward?
Signup and view all the answers
In what case was the defendant held liable for murder as a secondary party?
Signup and view all the answers
What is the significance of R v Stringer?
Signup and view all the answers
In order to be guilty as a secondary party, the defendant must perform the actus reus of the principal offence.
Signup and view all the answers
Joint principals must have the same mens rea for the principal offence.
Signup and view all the answers
An innocent agent is someone who intentionally assists the principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
Accessory liability requires that the defendant intended to assist the principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
A defendant can be guilty as a principal offender through an innocent agent.
Signup and view all the answers
Complicity requires that the defendant had actual knowledge of the principal offence.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Gnango, D was charged with murder because he was the one who shot the innocent pedestrian.
Signup and view all the answers
The doctrine of joint enterprise operated to hold D liable in situations where the normal principles of aiding, abetting, or counseling apply.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Jogee, the court abolished the doctrine of joint enterprise and merged it with the standard principles of aiding, abetting, etc.
Signup and view all the answers
The prosecution must prove that A knew the essential matters which constitute the principal offence to convict A as a secondary party.
Signup and view all the answers
If A and B jointly commit a robbery, the prosecution must prove that each defendant committed the actus reus of the offence and had the required mens rea.
Signup and view all the answers
D can be convicted as a secondary party if the prosecution proves that he aided the murder by supplying the hammer, but did not intend to supply the hammer to B.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Gianetto, the court held that the defendant was not liable for murder as a secondary party.
Signup and view all the answers
The law requires a separate doctrine of joint enterprise in addition to aiding, abetting, etc.
Signup and view all the answers
If A gives B a knife, telling B to stab C to death, and B does so, A is the principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
If A and B attack C simultaneously, but without intending to assist each other, they are both guilty of murder.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Powell and Daniels, D was charged with murder as a principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
The mens rea required for the defendant to be liable as a secondary party is intention to do the act which assisted or encouraged the principal offence.
Signup and view all the answers
A is guilty of murder as a principal offender if A gives B some poison, telling B it is medicine for B's child, and B gives the poison to the child, who dies.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Gianetto, the court held that D was liable as a principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
If A supplies B with a hammer, and B uses it to kill C, A is not liable for murder as an accessory.
Signup and view all the answers
A can be convicted as a secondary party if the prosecution proves that he foresaw that if B did kill, he would do so with the requisite mens rea for murder.
Signup and view all the answers
In order to convict B of murder as a principal offender, the prosecution must prove that B had both the actus reus and mens rea of murder.
Signup and view all the answers
The Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 only applies to summary offences.
Signup and view all the answers
If A and B decide to carry out a robbery together, but A keeps a lookout while B threatens the shop attendant, A is guilty of robbery as a principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
The mens rea required for accessory liability is the intention to aid or abet the principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
If A gives B a knife, telling B to stab C to death, and B does so, B is not guilty of murder as a principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Millward, D's conviction was upheld because P lacked the necessary mens rea for the offence.
Signup and view all the answers
An innocent agent is someone who lacks the necessary mens rea for the principal offence.
Signup and view all the answers
In Cogan and Leak, D was convicted as a principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
The salvation army was held liable for procuring the offence in Beatty v Gillbanks.
Signup and view all the answers
To be convicted as an accomplice, the defendant must intend to assist the principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Millward, P was convicted of the principal offence.
Signup and view all the answers
In complicity, the actus reus requirement is that the defendant's conduct must be capable of assisting or encouraging the principal offender, but it is not necessary that the defendant's conduct actually assists or encourages the principal offender.
Signup and view all the answers
For complicity by omission, the defendant must have breached a recognised duty to act, but it is not necessary that they have power or right to control the principal offender's conduct.
Signup and view all the answers
In cases of procuring, the defendant must have intended to cause the principal offender to commit the offence, but it is not necessary that they have full causation.
Signup and view all the answers
The mens rea requirement for complicity is that the defendant must have knowledge of the principal offender's mens rea.
Signup and view all the answers
In R v Clarkson, the court held that the defendant's voluntary presence was not sufficient to satisfy the actus reus of complicity.
Signup and view all the answers
For complicity, the defendant's conduct must be a direct cause of the principal offender's offence.
Signup and view all the answers
The ulterior mens rea requirement for complicity is that the defendant must intend the principal offender to commit the offence, but it is not necessary that they intend the principal offender to have the required mens rea.
Signup and view all the answers
In cases of aiding, abetting, or counselling, the defendant must have intended to assist or encourage the principal offender, but it is not necessary that they have knowledge of the principal offender's mens rea.
Signup and view all the answers
The defendant's omission can be sufficient to satisfy the actus reus of complicity, but only if they have a recognised duty to act.
Signup and view all the answers
For complicity, the defendant's conduct must be a substantial contribution to the principal offender's offence.
Signup and view all the answers