Criminal Law: Actus Reus Principles
48 Questions
0 Views

Criminal Law: Actus Reus Principles

Created by
@BuoyantClarity

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What legal issue arises when a terminally ill family member requests not to receive help with their condition?

  • Potential criminal liability for manslaughter (correct)
  • Loss of inheritance rights
  • Breach of contract
  • Potential civil liability for negligence

    • In the case of R v Smith, what was the crucial factor the jury had to consider regarding the wife's decisions?

  • The availability of medical resources
  • The wife's capacity to make rational decisions (correct)
  • The opinions of family members
  • The husband's financial situation

    • What was the outcome for the defendant in R v Smith after the jury's deliberation?

  • Acquitted of all charges (correct)
  • Found guilty of negligent homicide
  • Mandated to take a medical ethics course
  • Convicted of manslaughter

    • What might allow a defendant to be released from a duty to act according to the trial judge's instructions?

    <p>If the victim is capable of making their own decisions</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of relationship was acknowledged in relation to the duty to act in R v Smith?

    <p>Husband and wife</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following cases is mentioned as relevant in determining when a defendant might be released from a duty to act?

    <p>Airedale NHS Trust v Bland</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What possible consequence could arise if a caretaker overrides a terminally ill person's wishes?

    <p>Criminal charges for intervention</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the inability of the jury to reach a decision in R v Smith imply about legal duties?

    <p>Lack of unanimity on the definition of duty of care</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What condition was Tony Bland diagnosed with after the Hillsborough disaster?

    <p>Persistent vegetative state</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why did Tony Bland's doctors apply for court permission regarding his treatment?

    <p>They felt it was not in his best interests to continue treatment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What duty does Sandra have in relation to Muriel?

    <p>To attend all scheduled appointments to care for Muriel.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a significant outcome of the court's decision in Tony Bland's case?

    <p>Doctors need court permission before withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstance can Dhruv be held criminally liable?

    <p>If he was aware of the danger yet chose not to act.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the court's decision state regarding patients who refuse life-saving treatment?

    <p>Doctors are committing a criminal offense if they act against patient's refusal.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the result of Sandra's failure to attend Muriel's appointments?

    <p>Muriel died from dehydration.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following reasons justified the court's decision to allow discontinuation of treatment for Tony Bland?

    <p>He had no quality of life or prospect of improvement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What action could Dhruv have taken to avoid liability?

    <p>Returned to the vehicle and applied the handbrake.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the contractual duty of care imply for doctors?

    <p>They have a responsibility to act in the patient's best interests.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which situation does NOT impose a duty to act according to the content?

    <p>Providing financial support to someone in need.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what scenario can doctors discontinue treatment without court permission?

    <p>In emergency situations where prior approval is impracticable.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was Dhruv's initial action that created a dangerous situation?

    <p>Failing to put on the handbrake of his parked car.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the significance of the case R v Miller in relation to omissions?

    <p>It demonstrates the consequences of failing to act in a dangerous situation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the professional relationship criterion under which doctors hold their duty of care?

    <p>Special relationship or contractual duty.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the term 'contractual duty' in the context of care?

    <p>A legal obligation to provide care based on a signed document.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the reason for quashing the defendant's conviction in the appeal?

    <p>The victim died from broncho-pneumonia due to poor medical treatment.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of causation, what is a key difference established by the Court of Appeal regarding medical treatment?

    <p>Deviations from normal treatment can break the chain of causation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was specifically mentioned about the medical treatment in the case of R v Smith?

    <p>It was described as ‘thoroughly bad’.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What medical complication ultimately led to the victim’s death in the case discussed?

    <p>Broncho-pneumonia from liquid administration.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What overarching concept did later cases emphasize regarding the case of Jordan?

    <p>It was an exceptional case that should be treated differently.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the defendant's argument regarding the medical treatment in the R v Smith case?

    <p>The treatment interrupted the chain of causation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was one of the key findings of the Court of Appeal regarding normal medical treatment?

    <p>It can support a finding of causation if done appropriately.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characterized the decision-making of the Courts-Martial Appeal Court in R v Smith?

    <p>It ultimately dismissed the appeal regarding causation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a significant consequence suffered by the victim after his coma?

    <p>He lost sight in one eye</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what legal circumstance was the victim's wish for euthanasia granted?

    <p>It was legal in the country</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the court consider when evaluating whether voluntary euthanasia breaks the chain of causation?

    <p>Whether the decision was informed and deliberate</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what scenario might a third party's intervention break the chain of causation?

    <p>When the act is deliberate and informed</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the jury's conclusion regarding the defendant in the euthanasia case?

    <p>The defendant was not guilty of murder</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does a police officer's instinctive action affect the assessment of liability?

    <p>It can support a claim of self-defense</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What principle summarizes the liability of a defendant when a third party intervenes?

    <p>The original defendant will not be liable if the act is free, deliberate, and informed</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of injury could potentially trigger a request for euthanasia?

    <p>An injury leading to severe disability</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be established to prove factual causation in result crimes?

    <p>But for the defendant's conduct, the result would not have occurred as and when it did.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following describes legal causation in criminal law?

    <p>The conduct must be an operating and substantial cause of the outcome.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which scenario is likely to break the chain of causation?

    <p>A third party's intentional action that was unexpected.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the eggshell or thin skull rule imply in legal terms?

    <p>The defendant must take their victim as they find them.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Considering Timothy's case, what would the 'but for' test demonstrate?

    <p>Timothy caused Elizabeth's death by knocking her unconscious.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the appropriate charge for Timothy given the circumstances surrounding Elizabeth's death?

    <p>Manslaughter, as he lacked the relevant mental state for murder.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What kind of events can break the chain of causation?

    <p>Third-party actions that are voluntary and not related to the defendant.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which aspect must be true for a person's conduct to be an actual result in legal terms?

    <p>The conduct must be a more than minimal cause of the outcome.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    General Principles: Actus Reus

    • Actus Reus is one of the three key components for criminal conviction
    • Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea: an act does not make a man guilty of a crime, unless his mind is also guilty.
    • Guilty conduct by the defendant (actus reus)
    • Guilty state of mind (mens rea)
    • Absence of valid defence

    Learning Outcomes

    • Analyse the definition of a crime and understand the concept of actus reus, including the rules of legal and factual causation.
    • Explain the law relating to acts, omissions and states of affairs.

    Introduction

    • Proving the elements of criminal offences.
    • Actus reus, mens rea, absence of valid defence are usually required for conviction.
    • Actus reus: guilty conduct of the defendant
    • Mens rea: guilty state of mind of the defendant.

    General Principles of Actus Reus

    • Actus reus of every offence is different and may be found in statute or case law.
    • Actus reus generally involves anything in the crime's definition except state of mind, or possible defence.

    Types of Crimes

    • Criminal liability usually requires a positive act by the defendant.
    • Actus reus can be established by proving action, failure to act, or a state of affairs.
    • A crime can require an act, circumstance, or a consequence.

    Conduct Crimes

    • For most offences, the actus reus requires conduct.
    • An example would be perjury, where the defendant makes a false statement under oath.
    • The defendant's action is criminalised, not the outcome that results from the action.

    Result Crimes

    • Result crimes require a consequence to follow from the defendant's behavior.
    • Examples include criminal damage (property must be damaged) and murder (victim must die).
    • Causation issues are relevant.

    States of Affairs Crimes

    • Actus reus is satisfied simply by the existence of a state of affairs or circumstance.
    • No conduct is required; an example would be being found in the UK illegally.
    • Liability imposed based on circumstances, not personal choice.

    Liability for Omissions

    • Usually requires positive acts, but sometimes offences can be committed by failing to act.
    • Examples include road traffic offences (failing to stop at a red light or after an accident).
    • There's no general legal duty to help someone in trouble, making this uncommon.

    Exceptions to the General Rule: Special Relationships

    • Parent has a duty to care for their child.
    • Close cohabitation relationship may establish a duty to act.

    Voluntary Assumption of Care

    • A person who voluntarily undertakes care of another has a duty to act.
    • Includes situations where someone is unable to care for themselves (infancy, illness).

    Contractual Duty to Act

    • Contract specifying obligations to act can create a duty.
    • Examples include medical staff, emergency services, and lifeguards.
    • A breach can result in criminal liability.

    Creation of a Dangerous Situation

    • If a person creates a dangerous situation and is aware of it, they potentially have a duty to act.
    • Example: parking a car on a hill without handbrake.

    Causation

    • Causation is critical in result crimes; the prosecution must prove that the accused's action caused the prohibited consequence.
    • 2 elements to establish causation:
    • Factual causation (but for test)
    • Legal causation (substantial and operating cause)

    Factual Causation

    • But for the defendant's actions, the result would not have happened.
    • The defendant's conduct must be a substantial and operating cause of the consequence.
    • It is a more complex but critical component of establishing criminal liability.

    Intervening Events

    • Intervening acts can break the chain of causation if they are not reasonably foreseeable.
    • Medical treatment, victim's actions, or third-party intervention are possibilities.

    Voluntary Acts

    • Criminal liability depends on voluntary conduct.
    • Acts caused by reflexes or involuntary actions typically do not incur criminal liability.

    Voluntary Acts

    • Criminal liability depends on voluntary conduct.
    • Acts are typically judged based on voluntariness rather than a reflexive response.

    Summary

    • Actus Reus is one of three elements in criminal convictions.
    • Actus Reus considers conduct, circumstance, or consequence(s).
    • Specific exceptions to the general rule apply, such as special relationship, etc.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    General Principles: Actus Reus PDF

    Description

    This quiz explores the principles of actus reus within criminal law. Participants will analyze the definition of a crime and the essential components required for conviction, including the distinction between actus reus and mens rea. Gain a deeper understanding of legal causation and the implications of guilty conduct.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Open
    Browser
    Browser