CTL 4 - Procedural issues

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What limitation exists regarding attorney-client privilege in Japan for communications with in-house counsel?

Protection is extended to all documents regardless of ownership.

No specific protection from disclosure exists for certain documents. (correct)

Prima facie extension of privilege is granted to in-house counsel.

General confidentiality protections provide absolute privilege.

What was the outcome of the French courts' decision regarding in-house counsel's internal communications in the Whirlpool case?

The court dismissed claims of privilege entirely.

Only external communications had any chance of being privileged.

All internal communications were regarded as non-privileged.

Internal notes discussing external law firm advice were privileged. (correct)

In which of the following countries is there no concept of attorney-client privilege for in-house counsel?

Japan

South Korea

France

China (correct)

Which statement accurately reflects the legal framework in Japan regarding documents possessed by a client or third party?

They do not receive specific protection from disclosure. Signup and view all the answers

What crucial aspect regarding in-house counsel privilege is raised about jurisdictions like Japan?

In-house counsel may lack prima facie privilege extensions. Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes the authority of an arbitral tribunal from that of a judge in common law jurisdictions?

Judges have the authority to decide on an ex Aqua bono basis. Signup and view all the answers

Which statement accurately reflects the difference in document production between common and civil law jurisdictions?

Common law jurisdictions allow parties to seek production of all relevant documents. Signup and view all the answers

Under what condition can arbitrators render an award based on justice and appropriateness?

If the parties specifically agree to it. Signup and view all the answers

In a common law jurisdiction, what specific obligation does a party have regarding document production?

To produce all documents in their possession that may be relevant. Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary reason that civil law jurisdictions do not have a disclosure or discovery process?

Civil law systems rely on judges to gather evidence. Signup and view all the answers

What must parties in common law jurisdictions do during the document discovery process?

Produce documents that they are aware of and may be adverse to their case. Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes a Supreme Court's authority in Indonesia from that of arbitrators?

Supreme Courts can apply an ex Aqua bono approach, while arbitrators cannot. Signup and view all the answers

What is the primary purpose of discovery processes in common law systems?

To facilitate the truth-finding process in litigation. Signup and view all the answers

In civil law systems, who bears the burden of proof for their case?

Each party is responsible for proving their own case. Signup and view all the answers

What is a notable limitation of the discovery process in Indonesian civil law?

There is no obligation for parties to disclose evidence before proceedings. Signup and view all the answers

What is one goal of the disclosure process in litigation?

To ensure that all relevant documents are made available. Signup and view all the answers

How does the concept of 'trial by ambush' relate to disclosure?

It signifies that all evidence should be disclosed to avoid surprises. Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes common law systems from civil law systems regarding evidence?

Common law allows for more expansive evidence sharing than civil law. Signup and view all the answers

What is a characteristic feature of Indonesian civil procedure regarding evidence?

Parties submit evidence only during an evidentiary hearing. Signup and view all the answers

How do common law jurisdictions generally perceive the role of mutual knowledge in litigation?

It is crucial for a fair trial and achieving justice. Signup and view all the answers

What is often a result of limited disclosure mechanisms in civil law jurisdictions?

Decisions based solely on voluntarily submitted evidence. Signup and view all the answers

What must be proven for legal professional privilege to apply in Hong Kong when involving in-house counsel?

The existence of an employment relationship. Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is NOT a benchmark question to assess if advice from in-house counsel is privileged?

Was the advice shared with external parties? Signup and view all the answers

In Australia, what is the primary factor in determining the privilege of communications with in-house counsel?

Whether the in-house lawyer has a current practicing certificate. Signup and view all the answers

Which statement is TRUE regarding the legal privilege of in-house counsel in large MNCs?

Central in-house legal departments can provide advice protected by privilege. Signup and view all the answers

What additional requirement exists for legal advice to be protected by privilege?

It must be for the dominant purpose of providing legal advice. Signup and view all the answers

What distinguishes legal professional privilege in Hong Kong from other jurisdictions?

There is no need to establish an employment relationship. Signup and view all the answers

Which condition does NOT affect the privilege status of an in-house counsel's legal advice?

The advice was later shared with regulatory agencies. Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is a clear legal position regarding in-house counsel around the world?

In-house counsel must prove an employment relationship for privilege. Signup and view all the answers

What is a key difference in how in-house counsel's privilege is treated in Australia compared to other regions?

In-house counsel must also have ethical duties to the court. Signup and view all the answers

What is true about the obligation of legal privilege according to the content?

It continues to apply even after the Advocate-client relationship ends. Signup and view all the answers

In which jurisdiction do House counsel not have the right to claim privilege over their work?

Indonesia Signup and view all the answers

To whom does attorney-client privilege not apply in Thailand and Indonesia?

In house lawyers providing advice to employers Signup and view all the answers

What exceptions exist related to the obligation of confidentiality?

Disclosure may be mandated in cases involving money laundering or terrorism financing. Signup and view all the answers

How has Singapore adjusted its legal framework regarding in-house counsel?

It defined who qualifies as a client for in-house lawyers in its Evidence Act. Signup and view all the answers

What characterizes in-house lawyers compared to advocates in the content provided?

They are regarded strictly as employees providing legal services. Signup and view all the answers

What is one significant limitation of the legal privilege in civil law systems compared to common law systems?

It is less strictly enforced and may have a narrower scope. Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following is a factor in determining the applicability of privilege for in-house counsel in Singapore?

Whether they are employed by unrelated corporations. Signup and view all the answers

What obligation do advocates have concerning client information?

They are obliged to maintain confidentiality regarding client information. Signup and view all the answers

What does the term 'Advocate-client relationship' refer to?

The professional relationship between a lawyer and their client. Signup and view all the answers

Study Notes

Procedural Issues in Civil Law Jurisdictions

Civil law jurisdictions differ in procedural issues compared to common law systems.
Indonesia's court jurisdiction is based on absolute and relative competence.
Absolute competence (jurisdiction) is based on the type of case (e.g., criminal, family, commercial).
Relative competence (jurisdiction) depends on factors like location of parties or where a contract was signed.

Court Jurisdiction in Indonesia

Courts in Indonesia have power to hear certain cases based on the type of case (absolute competence), or based on the location of the parties (relative competence).
A court's authority to hear a specific type of case is determined by the subject matter and the nature of the legal matter or the type of relief sought.
Criminal Court has authority over criminal cases; family court over family-related matters; and the Commercial Court over commercial matters.
The relevant book on procedural issues in Indonesia, known as HHIR, has provisions in Article 118, subparagraph 1, on court jurisdiction.
If the defendant's residence is unknown, the civil case can be initiated in the Central Jakarta District Court.
A party can challenge that the correct court does not have the appropriate jurisdiction. Examples include land ownership disputes which are administrative state disputes.

Procedural Issues in Other Jurisdictions

Disclosure or discovery processes aren't typical in civil law systems.
Common law jurisdictions, like Singapore, allow parties to produce documents.
Parties are obliged to produce documents relevant to their cases, including documents that might be adverse.
Thailand has specialized courts for specific cases (e.g., labour disputes, intellectual property, commercial, tax issues).
Parties in Thailand are expected to gather their evidence before trial.

Privilege in Different Legal Systems

The legal concepts of privilege differ between common law and civil law systems.
In civil law systems, the obligation to keep information confidential from clients is not time-limited, and it continues even after the relationship between an advocate and client ends.
Advocates in civil law jurisdictions are obliged to maintain confidentiality of client information, but an in-house lawyer in a company isn't considered the same as an advocate, in that their employer (the company) is not their client.
In civil law systems, privilege is limited according to the role of the in-house counsel in relation to the organization, and based on the need to prove the existence of an employment relationship between the in-house counsel and the employer, to ensure the facts are correct.
In some countries, e.g., China, there is no privilege for in-house counsel (the advice they give isn't privileged).
France has courts that consider some in-house counsel communications privileged.
There are different exceptions to privilege depending on the jurisdiction, such as in case of financial crimes; terrorism, etc.

Important Concepts

Ex aequo et bono: A legal principle allowing judges or arbitrators to consider fairness and equity as opposed to strictly enforcing law in legal matters.
Territorial Jurisdiction: In principle, a country's courts have authority only within their borders.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Description

Explore the unique procedural issues in civil law jurisdictions, focusing specifically on Indonesia's court system. Understand the concepts of absolute and relative competence as they apply to different types of cases. This quiz will enhance your knowledge of how various courts operate within the Indonesian legal framework.