Corporate Governance and Directors' Duties
45 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is the main issue highlighted concerning smaller companies in relation to the UK Corporate Governance Code?

  • They typically have more transparency in director-shareholder relationships.
  • They are exempt from the monitoring duties of non-executive directors.
  • They may struggle with the costs of implementing management structures. (correct)
  • They have sufficient resources to implement the Code without issues.

How does Lowry perceive the relationship between ownership and management in most companies?

  • They should operate independently to prevent conflicts of interest.
  • They are often merged, which negates the need for complex governance. (correct)
  • They are usually distinct entities requiring rigorous governance.
  • They are unregulated by corporate governance standards.

What consequence arose from the informality of procedure among owner/managers in the Regal case?

  • It led to better shareholder relations.
  • It allowed directors to freely undertake corporate opportunities.
  • It permitted new shareholders to sue the previous owners for unfair actions. (correct)
  • It resulted in owners being able to sue each other without issue.

What is one of the responsibilities of directors regarding board meetings?

<p>Directors should attend board meetings whenever reasonably able. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one argument made regarding the role of non-executive directors?

<p>They are often reluctant to fulfill their monitoring duties. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What signifies a shift in judicial attitudes regarding director negligence?

<p>A higher standard of care is being enforced over time. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the Regal principle primarily seek to protect?

<p>The shareholders of smaller companies from potential usurpation by directors. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Under what condition can a director trust an official to perform delegated duties?

<p>In the absence of grounds for suspicion. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which case illustrates the principle of a director not being liable for failing to attend meetings?

<p>Marquis of Bute’s case (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What behavior is most likely to breach a director's fiduciary duty?

<p>Misappropriation of company property. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What guidance can directors take from recent changes in the standard of care expected from them?

<p>They must now adhere to a higher duty of care. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What legal principle is demonstrated in Cook v Deeks?

<p>Directors must only act in the best interest of the company. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the concept of 'ignorance could no longer be a shield to negligence' imply for directors?

<p>Directors can be held accountable for not knowing company affairs. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the Framlington case, why was the conflict of interest rule deemed inapplicable?

<p>The directors acted independently without prejudicing the company's interests. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the main issue in the Boardman v Phipps case?

<p>Directors benefitting from an opportunity due to their position. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In Island Export Finance v Umunna, what determined that Umunna did not misuse corporate opportunity?

<p>He was not working for the company at the time of the contract. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the outcome of the Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O’Malley case regarding corporate opportunities?

<p>Directors must not exploit opportunities obtained during their tenure. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the Peso Silver Mines case, what determined that the directors did not exploit a corporate opportunity?

<p>The company had turned down the proposed activity bona fide. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was a significant issue highlighted in Regal Hastings v Gulliver?

<p>The conflict between personal gain and corporate duty. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What issue arises when a director exploits an opportunity after a bona fide rejection by the board?

<p>Justification of self-interest actions during service. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In relation to the Bray v Ford case, which of the following is true about the obligations of directors?

<p>Directors are expected to act in the best interest of the corporation. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is the traditional interpretation of to whom directors owe their duties?

<p>Only to the providers of capital (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What statute replaced CA 1985 s309 regarding directors' duties?

<p>Companies Act 2006 s172(1) (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which case indicates that the interests of the company may include those of its creditors?

<p>Lonhro v Shell Petroleum (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to Vanessa Finch, when are directors likely to be held to account for incompetence?

<p>When their behavior shows gross negligence (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What challenges arise when trying to impose one standard of care on all directors?

<p>Differences in company size and structure (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In which situation may the interests of creditors become paramount?

<p>When the company is on the verge of bankruptcy (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What opinion is expressed about directors' duties of skill and care in recent years?

<p>They are expected to be more rigorous. (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which of the following best describes the directors’ duty as outlined by CA 2006 s172(1)?

<p>To promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is required of directors when they ought to know the company will go into insolvent liquidation?

<p>They must minimize the loss to creditors. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the leading case of Re City Equitable Fire & Insurance Co Ltd, what is Rule 1 concerning a director's performance?

<p>Directors need to exhibit a degree of skill expected from someone of their knowledge and experience. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What significant shift in the law regarding director's duties is mentioned in the content?

<p>Adoption of an objective standard of care. (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the case of Dorchester Finance Co v Stebbings, what principle was established regarding directors' duties?

<p>Duties owed by non-executive and executive directors are the same. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What did the court reveal in the Australian case Daniels v Anderson regarding directors' familiarity with company operations?

<p>Directors have a responsibility to become familiar with the running of the company. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What does the case of Norman v Theodore Goddard highlight regarding the standard of care expected from directors?

<p>It applies generally to all directors regardless of individual capability. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to the content, what aspect of the minimalist standard of competence is being reassessed by the courts?

<p>There is a call for an increase in standards and accountability. (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is a potential consequence for directors failing in their duty to creditors during insolvency?

<p>They could be held personally liable for breaches of duty. (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What factor has contributed to the decline in the general meeting’s supervision of corporate policy?

<p>Growth in monetary terms (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one of the duties of the general meeting concerning the company?

<p>To act for the benefit of the company as a whole (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was the purpose of the Cadbury Committee established in 1991?

<p>To tighten corporate control mechanisms (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

In the context of directors' duties, what is a key concern raised by the Dine report?

<p>Adequacy of self-regulation to ensure governance standards (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

According to recent discussions, what aspect of directors' obligations needs further scrutiny?

<p>The roles of non-executive directors (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What legal concept primarily determines the division of powers between the board and the general meeting?

<p>Articles of Association (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What key consideration must the general meeting account for in their decision-making?

<p>Interests of creditors as part of the whole company (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What was a significant outcome of financial scandals in the 1980s related to directors' duties?

<p>Establishment of the Cadbury Committee (B)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Division of Company Powers

The distribution of authority between the board of directors and the general meeting of a company.

General Meeting's Duty

To act in the best interest of the company as a whole, considering creditor interests as part of the company's overall interest.

Directors' Duties

Directors are the agents of the company with powers delegated to run the company.

Cadbury Committee

A committee set up in the 1990s to improve corporate governance mechanisms, e.g., Code of Best Practice.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Corporate Governance

System of rules, practices, and processes by which a company is directed and controlled.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Code of Best Practice

A set of guidelines to improve corporate governance standards.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Articles of Association

Defines the division of powers between the general meeting and the board of directors.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Automatic Self-Cleansing Co v Cunninghame

A legal case that demonstrates the importance of the Articles of Association in determining the power division (board vs. General Meeting).

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty to Minimize Loss

Directors must take steps to minimize losses to creditors when they know the company will go insolvent. Failure to do so can result in personal liability.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Case

This case established the basic standard of care expected from directors. Directors must possess the skills and knowledge of a reasonably experienced person in their position.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Subjective vs. Objective Standard of Care

The 'Re City Equitable' case initially used a subjective standard, based on the director's individual skills. Later cases, like 'Norman v Theodore Goddard', introduced an objective component, examining what is expected from someone holding that director position.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Influence of the 5th EC Directive

This directive contributed to the shift towards an objective standard of care for directors. Directors are held liable for company damage caused by their breaches of duty.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Dorchester Finance v Stebbings

This case emphasized the equal responsibility of both executive and non-executive directors. All directors owe the same level of care, regardless of their involvement in the company.

Signup and view all the flashcards

S214 IA86 (Art. 178 I(NI)O 89)

This statute solidified the objective standard of care for directors. It judges a director's actions against what would be expected of someone in their specific role, not just their individual capabilities.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Re D’Jan of London

This case suggests that the courts may be moving away from the lenient 'minimalist' standard of care tolerated in the early 20th century.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Daniels v Anderson (AWA Case)

This case highlighted the duty of directors to be informed about the everyday operations of the company, including crucial areas like foreign exchange dealings.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty of Care

Directors must exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in managing the company, avoiding gross negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Who Owe Directors Duties To?

Traditionally, directors owed duties only to the company's shareholders. However, the law considers the interests of employees, and in insolvency, creditors.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Directors' Freedom to Run Companies

Historically, directors had significant freedom to manage companies, even incompetently, as long as their actions didn't reach gross negligence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Why Different Standards of Care for Directors?

It's difficult to impose a single standard of care on all directors because companies, director experience, and decisions vary widely.

Signup and view all the flashcards

S. 309 & S. 172 (CA 1985 & 2006)

These statutes emphasize that directors must act in the best interests of the company as a whole, considering all stakeholders' interests.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Duty to Creditors?

Directors generally don't owe a direct duty to creditors, but when a company is insolvent, their interests become critical.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Sliding Scale for Creditor Interests

The importance of creditor interests in directors' duties is not fixed - it increases as the company's financial situation worsens.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Lonhro v Shell Petroleum

This case highlights that directors' duty to the company includes considering the interests of creditors, even if not the primary focus.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Regal Hastings Principle

A legal principle that prevents company directors from taking business opportunities that rightfully belong to the company, even if the directors act in good faith.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Peso/Umunna Approach

A more flexible approach to corporate governance, allowing for more discretion in handling corporate opportunities compared to the strict Regal Hastings principle.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Non-Executive Director's Monitoring Duty

A responsibility placed on non-executive directors in large companies to oversee the company's operations and ensure compliance with ethical and legal standards.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Shareholder Protection in Small Companies

The Regal Hastings principle should be strictly applied in small companies to protect shareholders from directors taking advantage of opportunities without proper knowledge or consent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Fused Ownership and Management

A situation in small companies where the shareholders are also the managers, blurring the lines between ownership and management.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty: Continuous Attention?

Directors are not required to constantly oversee company affairs. Their duties are performed at regular board meetings, and they are not obliged to attend every single one.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty: Delegation Allowed?

Directors can delegate tasks to others, like expert officials, as long as there's no reason to suspect wrongdoing.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty: Ignorance as a Shield?

Ignorance is no longer an excuse for negligence. Directors are expected to be competent and informed.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty: Subjective Test Outdated?

The excuse of 'I didn't know' is no longer acceptable. Directors are judged based on objective standards of competence.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Duty: Misappropriation of Company Property

Using company resources or assets for personal gain is a serious breach of duty.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Breach of Duty: Conflict of Duty and Interest

Directors must prioritize the company's interests over their own, especially when there's a conflict.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty: Sufficient Time for Oversight

Directors must dedicate enough time to overseeing the company's affairs to ensure proper management.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Director's Duty: Fiduciary Responsibility

Directors must act in good faith and in the best interests of the company.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Conflict of Interest

A situation where a person's personal interests could potentially influence their professional judgment or actions, creating a risk of bias or unfairness.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bray v Ford

A landmark case establishing the principle that a company director cannot profit from their position without the company's knowledge and consent.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Regal Hastings v Gulliver

This case further emphasized the duty of directors to act in the company's best interests, even if it means sacrificing personal gain.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Boardman v Phipps

A director who made a personal profit from a business opportunity that belonged to the company was held accountable.

Signup and view all the flashcards

IDC v Cooley

This case confirmed that directors cannot exploit business opportunities that belong to the company, even after resigning.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Canadian Aero Service Ltd v O’Malley

Directors cannot use their position to secretly acquire a company's assets for themselves or others.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew

This case clarified that directors' duties are owed only to the company, not to individuals within the company.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Bhullar v Bhullar

This case demonstrated that directors may owe fiduciary duties to other companies, not just their own, if they are involved in their management.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Division of Company Powers

  • Originally, company powers resided with the general meeting of members.
  • Directors acted as agents of the company on behalf of the general meeting.
  • General meeting's authority has decreased due to company growth and complexity.
  • Larger companies see a clear separation between ownership and control.
  • Articles of Association delineate powers between the board and general meeting.
  • Duty of general meeting is to act for the benefit of the company.
  • Company interests must be prioritized over interests of creditors (within company interests).

Directors' Duties

  • Directors are viewed as agents with delegated powers to manage the company.
  • 1980s financial scandals led to the Cadbury Committee's formation to strengthen corporate controls.
  • Code of Best Practice was developed.
  • "Governance of governance" criticizes the Code for further debate and issues like non-executive directors' roles.
  • Legal review regarding director duties is needed to enhance corporate governance standards.

Duty of Care and Skill

  • Directors aren't obligated to exhibit exceptional skill but must meet a reasonable standard.
  • The standard expectation is initially low but increasing.
  • Fifth EC Directive (Art 14) introduced liability for board members' actions that negatively impact the company.
  • Objective standard of care is now required (IA 86/Art 178 I(NI)O 89) and is what someone in that particular position would be expected to do.
  • Directors should be aware of company affairs.
  • Directors should hold regular board meetings (but aren't obliged to attend all).
  • Directors should attend meetings if able.

Conflict of Duty and Interest

  • Misappropriating company property (e.g., Cook v Deeks)
  • Conflict of interest arises when a director's personal interests conflict with those of the company.
  • Cases like Bray v Ford, Regal Hastings v Gulliver, Boardman v Phipps, IDC v Cooley, Canadian Aero etc have explored this.
  • Framlington Group case examined company director conflict of interest implications where a company selling another was conflicted with the possible sale profit.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

Related Documents

Week 4 Directors Duties Handout PDF

Description

Explore the division of company powers and the evolution of directors' duties in corporate governance. This quiz covers the historical context, the impact of financial scandals, and the regulatory frameworks that shape modern corporate practices. Test your understanding of the roles and responsibilities of directors and general meetings.

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Open
Browser
Browser