Podcast
Questions and Answers
According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition I, under what conditions does the total value of a firm's securities remain unaffected by its capital structure?
According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition I, under what conditions does the total value of a firm's securities remain unaffected by its capital structure?
- When agency costs are significant.
- In a perfect capital market. (correct)
- When asymmetric information is prevalent.
- When financial distress costs are high.
According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II, what happens to the cost of capital of levered equity as the firm's market value debt-equity ratio increases?
According to Modigliani-Miller Proposition II, what happens to the cost of capital of levered equity as the firm's market value debt-equity ratio increases?
- It remains constant.
- It fluctuates randomly.
- It decreases.
- It increases. (correct)
Firms often deviate from perfect capital market conditions when choosing their optimal capital structure by considering market imperfections. Which of the following is an example of a market imperfection?
Firms often deviate from perfect capital market conditions when choosing their optimal capital structure by considering market imperfections. Which of the following is an example of a market imperfection?
- Operational efficiencies
- Economies of scale
- Financial distress costs (correct)
- Technological innovation
What are the three main methods leveraged firms use to incorporate the costs and benefits associated with leverage into their capital budgeting decisions?
What are the three main methods leveraged firms use to incorporate the costs and benefits associated with leverage into their capital budgeting decisions?
What key assumption underlies the WACC method when applying it to capital budgeting decisions?
What key assumption underlies the WACC method when applying it to capital budgeting decisions?
In calculating free cash flow for capital budgeting, what adjustments are made to incremental earnings to arrive at free cash flow?
In calculating free cash flow for capital budgeting, what adjustments are made to incremental earnings to arrive at free cash flow?
How does the WACC method account for the interest tax shield in capital budgeting?
How does the WACC method account for the interest tax shield in capital budgeting?
According to the example provided, Avco is considering a new packaging line, the RFX Series. The marketing group expects annual sales of $60 million per year for the next four years. Manufacturing costs are expected to be $25 million and operating expenses $9 million respectively, per year. If Avco has upfront R&D and marketing expenses of $6.67 million, and a $24 million investment in equipment, with a corporate tax rate of 25%, all to be depreciated on a straight line method, what is the unlevered Income for Year 1?
According to the example provided, Avco is considering a new packaging line, the RFX Series. The marketing group expects annual sales of $60 million per year for the next four years. Manufacturing costs are expected to be $25 million and operating expenses $9 million respectively, per year. If Avco has upfront R&D and marketing expenses of $6.67 million, and a $24 million investment in equipment, with a corporate tax rate of 25%, all to be depreciated on a straight line method, what is the unlevered Income for Year 1?
In the context of the RFX project, how is the levered value of the investment computed using the WACC?
In the context of the RFX project, how is the levered value of the investment computed using the WACC?
When implementing a constant debt-equity ratio following a new project, how can a company add debt to maintain its target ratio?
When implementing a constant debt-equity ratio following a new project, how can a company add debt to maintain its target ratio?
Following the implementation of the RFX project, Avco decides to spend its $20 million in cash and borrow an additional $15.365 million. If only $29 million is required to fund the project, what will Avco likely do with the remaining cash?
Following the implementation of the RFX project, Avco decides to spend its $20 million in cash and borrow an additional $15.365 million. If only $29 million is required to fund the project, what will Avco likely do with the remaining cash?
Avco maintains a constant debt-equity ratio. After undertaking the RFX project, the market value of Avco's equity increases by $35.365 million and it pays a dividend of $6.365 million. What does the shareholders' total gain represent?
Avco maintains a constant debt-equity ratio. After undertaking the RFX project, the market value of Avco's equity increases by $35.365 million and it pays a dividend of $6.365 million. What does the shareholders' total gain represent?
What defines a firm's 'debt capacity' in the context of maintaining a target debt-to-value ratio?
What defines a firm's 'debt capacity' in the context of maintaining a target debt-to-value ratio?
Assume a company has a levered value equal to the FCF divided by (1 + rwace). How do you calculate the debt capacity?
Assume a company has a levered value equal to the FCF divided by (1 + rwace). How do you calculate the debt capacity?
Company A has a market value of equity of $600 million and a market value of debt of $400 million. It's considering a project with a present value of cash flows of $40 million and an initial investment of $30 million. To maintain its current debt ratio, how much debt should Company A add?
Company A has a market value of equity of $600 million and a market value of debt of $400 million. It's considering a project with a present value of cash flows of $40 million and an initial investment of $30 million. To maintain its current debt ratio, how much debt should Company A add?
What is the first step in the Adjusted Present Value (APV) method for capital budgeting?
What is the first step in the Adjusted Present Value (APV) method for capital budgeting?
Why is the cost of equity of a levered firm not appropriate for discounting cash flows in the unlevered firm under APV?
Why is the cost of equity of a levered firm not appropriate for discounting cash flows in the unlevered firm under APV?
If a firm adjusts its debt proportionally to a project's value or its cash flows, what is this an example of?
If a firm adjusts its debt proportionally to a project's value or its cash flows, what is this an example of?
Under the APV method, the unlevered cost of capital for Avco is calculated to be 8.0%. If the expected free cash flow for year 1 is $21 million, what is the present value?
Under the APV method, the unlevered cost of capital for Avco is calculated to be 8.0%. If the expected free cash flow for year 1 is $21 million, what is the present value?
When valuing the interest tax shield, what is the implication of a firm maintaining a target leverage ratio?
When valuing the interest tax shield, what is the implication of a firm maintaining a target leverage ratio?
What does the adjusted present value equal according to the material?
What does the adjusted present value equal according to the material?
In the APV method, what is assumed about the risk of future interest tax shields when a firm maintains a constant target leverage ratio?
In the APV method, what is assumed about the risk of future interest tax shields when a firm maintains a constant target leverage ratio?
In the APV method, you have already found the value of the unlevered project. What is the next step?
In the APV method, you have already found the value of the unlevered project. What is the next step?
In a scenario where debt levels are set according to a fixed schedule, which cost of capital should be used to discount the predetermined interest tax shields?
In a scenario where debt levels are set according to a fixed schedule, which cost of capital should be used to discount the predetermined interest tax shields?
Which of the following is a key step in the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method?
Which of the following is a key step in the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method?
In the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method, what discount rate is applied to the cash flows available to equity holders?
In the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method, what discount rate is applied to the cash flows available to equity holders?
What adjustments are made when calculating Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)?
What adjustments are made when calculating Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)?
When computing FCFE from FCF, what formula accurately reflects the calculation?
When computing FCFE from FCF, what formula accurately reflects the calculation?
If Avco had to calculate an after-tax interest expense, and it was given that the interest expenses was 6%, with an after-tax rate of 25%, how would this be calculated?
If Avco had to calculate an after-tax interest expense, and it was given that the interest expenses was 6%, with an after-tax rate of 25%, how would this be calculated?
Why does the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method not require that the initial investment be subtracted?
Why does the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method not require that the initial investment be subtracted?
Which of the following is considered an advantage of the FTE method?
Which of the following is considered an advantage of the FTE method?
The textbook makes a comparison between the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), Adjusted Present Value (APV), and Flow-to-Equity (FTE) methods. When is the APV method usually the simplest approach?
The textbook makes a comparison between the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), Adjusted Present Value (APV), and Flow-to-Equity (FTE) methods. When is the APV method usually the simplest approach?
For which scenario is the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method typically employed?
For which scenario is the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method typically employed?
If the market value of equity increased, the additional debt needed would be $0, and the firm would pay existing cash as a dividend. Which method does this best describe?
If the market value of equity increased, the additional debt needed would be $0, and the firm would pay existing cash as a dividend. Which method does this best describe?
A company has decided to pay dividends to shareholders. What calculation might be correct?
A company has decided to pay dividends to shareholders. What calculation might be correct?
In the FTE method, the value is defined as always being which of the following?
In the FTE method, the value is defined as always being which of the following?
What constitutes the disadvantages to the FTE method?
What constitutes the disadvantages to the FTE method?
The formula for Debt Capacity at a specific Year is defined as being what?
The formula for Debt Capacity at a specific Year is defined as being what?
What should a firm consider when choosing its optimal capital structure, given that they often deviate from perfect market conditions?
What should a firm consider when choosing its optimal capital structure, given that they often deviate from perfect market conditions?
Which of the following is a critical assumption underlying the WACC method of capital budgeting?
Which of the following is a critical assumption underlying the WACC method of capital budgeting?
In the WACC method, how are the tax savings due to debt financing incorporated into the capital budgeting process?
In the WACC method, how are the tax savings due to debt financing incorporated into the capital budgeting process?
Avco is analyzing the RFX project, using a straight-line depreciation method. In year one, Avco accounts for Sales of $60 million, Manufacturing costs of $25 million, and Operating Expenses of $9 million with depreciation at $6 million. Assuming a tax rate of 25%, what is the incremental earnings for Year 1?
Avco is analyzing the RFX project, using a straight-line depreciation method. In year one, Avco accounts for Sales of $60 million, Manufacturing costs of $25 million, and Operating Expenses of $9 million with depreciation at $6 million. Assuming a tax rate of 25%, what is the incremental earnings for Year 1?
When a company adds new debt to maintain a constant debt-to-equity ratio following a new project, where does the added debt most likely come from?
When a company adds new debt to maintain a constant debt-to-equity ratio following a new project, where does the added debt most likely come from?
Avco has $20 million in cash and borrows an additional $15.365 million to fund the RFX project and decides to pay dividends to shareholders with remaining cash. How much cash will Avco likely pay to shareholders?
Avco has $20 million in cash and borrows an additional $15.365 million to fund the RFX project and decides to pay dividends to shareholders with remaining cash. How much cash will Avco likely pay to shareholders?
The market value of Avco's equity increases by $35.365 million after undertaking the RFX project, and it pays a dividend of $6.365 million. What does the shareholders' gain represent?
The market value of Avco's equity increases by $35.365 million after undertaking the RFX project, and it pays a dividend of $6.365 million. What does the shareholders' gain represent?
A company has a market value of equity of $600 million and a market value of debt of $400 million. It is considering a project with a present value of cash flows of $40 million and an initial investment of $30 million. To maintain its current debt ratio, how much debt should the company add?
A company has a market value of equity of $600 million and a market value of debt of $400 million. It is considering a project with a present value of cash flows of $40 million and an initial investment of $30 million. To maintain its current debt ratio, how much debt should the company add?
Why can a firm's cost of equity not be appropriate for discounting cash flows in the unlevered firm under APV?
Why can a firm's cost of equity not be appropriate for discounting cash flows in the unlevered firm under APV?
If a firm modifies its debt level in response to a project's fluctuating value, how is this best described?
If a firm modifies its debt level in response to a project's fluctuating value, how is this best described?
After finding the value of the unlevered project in the APV method, what is the next step?
After finding the value of the unlevered project in the APV method, what is the next step?
When using the APV method, and debt levels are set according to a predetermined fixed schedule, which cost of capital is most appropriate for discounting the interest tax shields?
When using the APV method, and debt levels are set according to a predetermined fixed schedule, which cost of capital is most appropriate for discounting the interest tax shields?
Which of the following best describes the focus of the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method?
Which of the following best describes the focus of the Flow-to-Equity (FTE) method?
In the Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) calculation, what is the effect of net borrowing?
In the Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE) calculation, what is the effect of net borrowing?
How is the FTE method an advantage?
How is the FTE method an advantage?
Which method would typically be best when values in the firm's capital structure or the interest tax shield are difficult to determine?
Which method would typically be best when values in the firm's capital structure or the interest tax shield are difficult to determine?
What best describes the debt capacity at a specific time?
What best describes the debt capacity at a specific time?
Company A is deciding whether to use a constant debt-equity ratio for a new project. Which of these describes what the company will do?
Company A is deciding whether to use a constant debt-equity ratio for a new project. Which of these describes what the company will do?
Calculating FCFE involves understanding how certain cash flows are adjusted. Which of the following correctly reflects the relationship between Free Cash Flow (FCF) and Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)?
Calculating FCFE involves understanding how certain cash flows are adjusted. Which of the following correctly reflects the relationship between Free Cash Flow (FCF) and Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)?
Flashcards
MM Proposition I
MM Proposition I
In perfect markets, the value of a firm's securities equals the market value of total cash flows generated by assets, unaffected by capital structure.
MM Proposition II
MM Proposition II
The cost of capital of levered equity increases with the firm's market value debt-equity ratio
Optimal Capital Structure
Optimal Capital Structure
Optimal capital structure based on market imperfections like taxes, distress costs, agency costs, and asymmetric information.
WACC Method
WACC Method
Signup and view all the flashcards
Free Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow
Signup and view all the flashcards
WACC and Tax Savings
WACC and Tax Savings
Signup and view all the flashcards
Adjusted Present Value (APV)
Adjusted Present Value (APV)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Discount Rate in APV
Discount Rate in APV
Signup and view all the flashcards
Flow-to-Equity (FTE)
Flow-to-Equity (FTE)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Debt Capacity
Debt Capacity
Signup and view all the flashcards
Value of the Project with Leverage
Value of the Project with Leverage
Signup and view all the flashcards
Implementing a constant debt-equity ratio with NPV projects
Implementing a constant debt-equity ratio with NPV projects
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- This class is being recorded for educational use, revision, and for students unable to attend the live session
- The recording will capture the educator's audio, video and main screen presentation
- The recording will capture any video, guest presenters, and class activities
- The recording may also capture audio and video of class participants
- The recording will be made available through Moodle
- The recording should only be accessed by the students enrolled in this unit
- Recordings should not be shared, reproduced, or distributed
Corporate Finance 2 - Week 3
- Capital Budgeting with Leverage is the topic for this week
- Readings for this week are in Chapter 18
Important Information
- Lecture Notes and all illustrations provided throughout the semester must be reviewed
- Tutorial Questions/Solutions must be reviewed
- Online-quiz Questions/Solutions must be reviewed
- Relevant Chapters in the textbook and any additional assigned readings must be reviewed
- All of the above materials are examinable
Introduction
- MM Proposition I: In a perfect capital market, the total value of a firm's securities is equal to the market value of the total cash flows generated by its assets and is not affected by its choice of capital structure
- MM Proposition II: The cost of capital of levered equity increases with the firm's market value debt-equity ratio
- Cost of Capital of Levered Equity can be calulcated as: rE = rU + (D/E)*(rU - rD)
Introduction
- Firms usually choose their optimal capital structure based on market imperfections like taxes, financial distress costs, agency costs (benefits), and asymmetric information
Capital Budgeting Decisions
- A levered firm should incorporate the costs and benefits associated with leverage into its Capital Budgeting Decisions
Three Main Methods
- Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
- Adjusted Present Value (APV)
- Flow-to-Equity (FTE)
Weighted Average Cost of Capital Method
- Free cash flow measures the after-tax cash flow of a project before considering how it is financed
- The WACC method uses the after-tax cost of capital as the discount rate
- The WACC method takes the interest tax shield into account
- When the market risk of the project is similar to the average market risk of the firm's investment, then its cost of capital equals the firm's WACC
- Under WACC method, a firm maintains a constant debt-equity ratio
- Under WACC method, the WACC remains constant over time
Calculate Free Cash Flow
- Start with Revenue, subtract Cost of Goods Sold to to achieve Gross Profit
- Subtract Selling, General and Admin Expenses and Depreciation from Gross Profit to achieve EBIT.
- Subtract Income tax from EBIT to get Incremental Earnings
- Add back Depreciation to Incremental Earnings
- Subract Capital Expenditure and change in Net Working Capital
- The result is Free Cash Flow
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital Method (cont'd)
- Calculate the Weighted Average Cost of Capital rWACC = (E/(E+D))*rE + (D/(E+D))rD(1-t)
- Because the WACC incorporates the tax savings from debt, the levered value of an investment can be computed by discounting its future free cash flow using the WACC
- Calculating Levered Value can be done by the following equation: V0L = FCF1/(1+rWACC) + FCF2/(1+rWACC)^2 + FCF3/(1+rWACC)^3
Using the WACC to Value a Project
- Avco is considering introducing a new line of packaging, the RFX Series
- The technology used in these products is expected to become obsolete after four years
- The marketing group expects annual sales of $60 million per year over the next four years for this product line
- Manufacturing costs are expected to be $25 million per year
- Operating expenses are expected to be $9 million per year
Using the WACC to Value a Project (cont'd)
- Developing the product will require upfront R&D and marketing expenses of $6.67 million, along with a $24 million equipment investment
- The equipment will be obsolete in four years and depreciated via the straight-line method
- Avco expects no net working capital requirements for the project
- Avco pays a corporate tax rate of 25%
Expected Free Cash Flow from Avco's RFX Project
- Sales are 60 million for years 1-4
- Cost of Goods sold is 25 million for years 1-4
- Gross profit is 35 million for year 1-4
- Operating expenses is 6.67 million for year 0 and 9 million for years 1-4
- Depreciation is 6 million for years 1-4
- EBIT is -6.67 in year 0 and 20 million for years 1-4
- Income Tax at 25% is 1.67 million in year 0 and and 5 million for years 1-4
- Unlevered Net Income is -5 million in year 0 and 15 million for years 1-4
- Depreciation is 6 million dollars for years 1-4
- Capital Expenditure is 24 million dollars in year 0
- Free Cash Flow is -29 million in year 0 and 21 million for years 1-4
Avco's Current Market Value Balance Sheet ($ million) and Cost of Capital Without the RFX Project
- Cash is 20, and existing assets is 600, for total assets of 620
- Debt is 320 and Equity is 300 for total Liabilities and Equity of 620
- Cost of Debt is 6% and Cost of Equity is 10%
- Net debt is $320m-$20m = $300m
Using the WACC to Value a Project (cont'd)
- Avco intends to maintain a similar (net) debt-equity ratio for the foreseeable future, including any financing related to the RFX project, therefore Avco's WACC can be calculated as: rWACC = (E/(E+D))rE + (D/(E+D)rD(1-t) = (300/600)(10%) + (300/600)(6%)(1-.25) = 7.25%
- Note that net debt = D = $320-20 = $300 million
Using the WACC to Value a Project (cont'd)
- The value of the project, including the tax shield from debt, is calculated as the present value of its future free cash flows.
- Discount values for years 1 to 4 are calculated as 21/1.0725, 21/(1.0725^2), 21/(1.0725^3), 21/(1.0725^4)
- The project has an asset worth of $70.73 million
- The NPV of the project is $41.73 million (NPV = $70.73 million – $29 million = $41.73 million)
Summary of WACC Method
- Determine the free cash flow of the investment
- Compute the weighted average cost of capital
- Compute the value of the investment, including the tax benefit of leverage, by discounting the free cash flow of the investment using the WACC
- The WACC can be used throughout the firm as the companywide cost of capital for new investments that are of comparable risk to the rest of the firm and that will not alter the firm's debt-equity ratio
Implementing a Constant Debt-Equity Ratio
- Avco adds new assets with initial market value $70.73 million by undertaking the RFX project
- To maintain its debt-to-value ratio, Avco must add $35.365 million in new debt
- .50 * 70.73 million calculation
- Avco can add this debt either by reducing cash or by borrowing and increasing debt
Implementing a Constant Debt-Equity Ratio (cont'd) with NPV of New Project
- Avco decides to spend its $20 million in cash and borrow (and immediately spend) an additional $15.365 million
- So, the company has ($20m + $15.365m) = $35.365million cash with it
- Only $29 million is required to fund the project, therefore Avco will pay the remaining $6.365 million to shareholders through a dividend (or share repurchase)
- $35.365 million – $29 million = $6.365 million
Avco's Current Market Value Balance Sheet ($ million) with the RFX Project - Before Capital Structure change
- Asset side, cash 20, existing assets for 600, total 620
- Liability side, debt 320, equity 300, total 620
- Debt is 6% cost
- Equity is 10% cost
Avco's Current Market Value Balance Sheet ($ million) with the RFX Project - After Capital Structure change
- Asset side, existing assets for 600, RFX project for 70.73 total 670.73, zero cash, and a total of 670.73
- Liability side, debt 335.365, equity 335.365 and total liabilities and Equity are also 670.73
Implementing a Constant Debt-Equity Ratio (cont'd)
- The market value of Avco's equity increases by $35.365 million (335.365 – $300 = $35.365 million)
- Adding the dividend of $6.365 million, the shareholders' total gain is $41.73 million including both the increase in equity and the dividend, which matches the NPV calculated for the RFX project
Implementing a Constant Debt-Equity Ratio (cont'd) Debt Capacity
- Debt Capacity is the amount of debt at a particular date that is required to maintain the firm's target debt-to-value ratio
- The debt capacity at date t can be calculated as: Dt = d * VLt where d is the firm's target debt-to-value ratio and VLt is the levered continuation value on date t
Implementing a Constant Debt-Equity Ratio (cont'd) Debt Capacity VL
- Value of FCF in year t +2 and beyond V¹t = FCF+1 / 1 + rWACC + VL/ 1 + rWACC
Value and Debt Capacity of the RFX Project over Time
- Free Cash Flow at Year 0 is (29.00), and other years are 21.00, 21.00, 21.00 and 21.00.
- Levered Value, VL at Value, VL (at rwacc = 7.25%) at Year 0 is 70.73, Year 1 is 54.86 Year 2 is 37.84, and Year 3 is 19.58.
- Debt Capacity, D₁ (at d = 50%) at Year 0 is 35.37, Year 1 is 27.43, Year 2 is 18.92, Year 3 is 9.79.
Example
- A company has a market value of equity of $600 million and a market value of debt of $400 million
- The company intends to maintain its debt ratio for the foreseeable future
- It is considering a project with a present value of cash flows of $40 million and an initial investment of $30 million
- Need to show the market value balance sheet for the company soon after investing in this project
- Need to reconcile the value of equity in new balance sheet with that of the old balance sheet
Solution
- The company has $600 million equity and $400 million debt with a market value of assets of $1,000 million
- The company's debt ratio is [400/1,000] = 40%
- The project has a present value (levered value) of $40 million. So, the company's market value of assets will increase by this amount
- To maintain the above debt ratio, the company should add (40 x 0.40) = $16 million debt
- This will increase the amount of debt to $416 million
Solution - New market value balance sheet
- Assets are divided into two sections, existing assets and PV of New Project.
- Total Assets = 1000 of existing assets PLUS 40 worth of PV of Project, therefore 1040.
- Liabilities and Equity: debt is 416, Equity is 624, total 1040
- In the start, value or equity before project = $600
- During the project, new equity capital raised = $30 invested less 16 added dept = 14
- Project will increase value of equity. NPV = $40 projected future profits and only 30 of new required assets means NPV = $10 increase to equity
- After all transactions, value of equity with project = Old value of Equity 600 + capital raised during process + new value created by project = $624
Adjusted Present Value
- A valuation method that is aimed at determining the levered value of an investment by first calculating its unlevered value and then adding the value of the interest tax shield
- VL = APV = VU + PV(Interest Tax Shield)
The Unlevered Value of the Project
- The first step is to calculate the value of the free cash flows using the project's cost of capital as if it were financed without leverage
- Discounting the cash flows at a rate that only reflects the firm's business risk is required.
- Its cost of equity cannot be an appropriate rate, because it only captures the cash flows available to equity holders
The Unlevered Value of the Project (cont'd)
- To capture the total cash flows available to the firm, need to consider the cash flows available to the debtholders, using the cost of debt
- the discount rate should be the weighted average cost of capital, except that dont take into account the taxes. rU = E/(E+D)rE + D/(E+D)rD
- rU now captures cash flows at the firm level.
The Unlevered Value of the Project (cont'd)
- For Avco the unlevered cost of capital is calculated as: rU = .50 * 10% + .50 * 6% = 8.0%
- The project has a value without leverage, and can be calculated as: VU = 21/1.08 + 21/1.08^2 + 21/1.08^3 + 21/1.08^4 = $69.55 million
Target Leverage Ratio
- When a firm adjusts its debt proportionally to a project's value or its cash flows (where the proportion needs not remain constant) represents target leverage ratio of firm.
- A constant market debt-equity ratio is a special case.
Valuing the Interest Tax Shield
- The value of $69.55 million is the value of the unlevered project and does not include the value of the tax shield provided by the interest payments on debt
- Interest paid in year t = rD xt - 1
- The interest tax shield is equal to the interest paid multiplied by the corporate tax rate
Expected Debt Capacity, Interest Payments, and Tax Shield for Avco's RFX Project
- Debt Capacity, D₁ (at d = 50%)at Year 0 is 35.37, at Year 1 is 27.43, Year 2 is 18.92, and Year 3 is 9.79.
- Interest Paid (at rp = 6%)at Year 1 is 2.12, Year 2 is 1.65, Year 3 is 1.14, and Year 4 is 0.59.
- Interest Tax Shield (at т = 25%)at Year 1 is 0.53, Year 2 is 0.41, Year 3 is 0.28 and Year 4 is 0.15
- The interest paid in year 1 can be calculated as 35.37 * 0.06 = 2.12
Valuing the Interest Tax Shield cont'd
- The next step is to find the present value of the intrest tax shield
- When the firm maintains a target leverage ratio, its future interest tax shields have similar risk to the project's cash flows, so they can be discounted at unlevered cost of capital PV (interest tax shield) = .53/1.08 + .41/1.08^2 + .28/1.08^3 + .15 /1.08^4 = $1.18 million
Valuing the Interest Tax Shield cont'd
- The total value of the project with leverage is the sum of the value of the interest tax shield and the value of the unlevered project
- VL = VU + PV(interest tax shield) = 69.55 + 1.18 = $70.73 million
- this is also the NPV of the project and is $41.73
- can be calculated as $70.73 million - $29 million = $41.73 million
Expected Debt Capacity, Intrest Payments and Tax Shield for Avco's RFX project
- The first line is Debt Capacity D_t at d= 50%, the numbers are 35.37, 27.43, 18.92, and 9.79
- The second line is Interest Paid and numbers are 2.12, 1.65, 1.14, and 0.59
Pre Determined Debt Levels
- Rather than set debt to meet target debt-equity ratio, the firm may change debt and equity on a fixed schedule in advanced and can be known
Pre Determined Debt Levels cont'd
- When debt lavels are set to meet fixed schedule, interest tax shields discount through the debt cost of the capital
- Project Value is calculated by adding Free Cash Flows and PV Investment tax shield
Summary of the APV Method
- Determine the investment's value without leverage
- Determine the present value of the interest tax shield, which consists of determining the expected interest tax shield, and discounting the interest tax shield.
- Add the unlevered value to the present value of the interest tax shield to determine the value of the investment with leverage
Summary of the APV Method (cont'd)
- The APV method may be easier to apply than the WACC method when the firm does not maintain a constant debt-equity ratio
- The APV approach also explicitly values market imperfections; therefore, it allows managers to measure their contribution to value
The Flow-to-Equity Method
- A valuation method that calculates the free cash flow available to equity holders considering debt to equity holders
- The cash flow to equity holders are then discounted using the equity cost of capital
Calculating the Free Cash Flow to Equity
- The free cash flow that remains after adjusting for interest payments, debt issuance, and debt repayments is used for free cash flow to equity.
- The first step in the FTE method is to determine the project's free cash flow to equity
Spreadsheet Expected Free Cash Flows to Equity from Avco's RFX Project
- Sales $60 million for years 1 through 4
- Cost of Goods Sold: $25 million for years 1 through 4
- Gross Profit: $35 million for years 1 through 4
- The rest of numbers are documented on the spreadsheet
Calculating the Free Cash Flow to Equity (cont'd)
- The calculation of FCF has two notes that need to make attention:
- Interest expenses are subtracted before taxes
- Borrowing and the proceeds are included from all activities and can be expressed as: net borrowing at date t=Dt – Dt-1.
Expected Debt Capacity and the Interest and Tex Shield
- The same chart shown above here
Calculating the Free Cash Flow to Equity (cont'd)
FCFE=FCF - (1 - Tc) X ( interest payments) + net borrowing
Computing FCFE from FCF for Avco's RFX Project
- From the spreadsheet, the after tax intrest expenses in year 1 can be presented as $53.7 *6% * (1 - .25) = $ 1.59 where the chart has been documented above.
Valuing Equity Cash Flow
- Since FCFE represents payment to equity holders, it is considered for discounting through equity cost of capital
Valuing Equity Cash Flows (cont'd)
- The value of the project's FCFE represents the gain to shareholders from the project and it is identical to the NPV computed using the WACC and APV methods
Summary of the Flow-to-Equity Method
- Determine the free cash flow to equity of the investment
- Determine the equity cost of capital
- Compute the equity value by discounting the free cash flow to equity using the equity cost of capital
Summary of the Flow-to-Equity Method (cont'd)
- The FTE method offers some advantages like when the firm capital structure is complex or not know.
- The FTE method has a disadvantage: compute the project's debt capacity to determine the interest before decision can be made.
A Comparison of Methods
- WACC method is the optimal when the firm will maintain a fixed debt to value ratio over the investment
- APV method is the optimal when alternative leverage policies is usually the simplest approach
- FTE method are used only in complicated settings or hard to determine the values.
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.