Contract Law: Offers and Termination
35 Questions
1 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which mode of offer termination involves a withdrawal by the offeror?

  • Expiration/Lapse of time
  • Death or incompetency
  • Rejection
  • Revocation (correct)
  • A counteroffer does not terminate the original offer.

    False

    What is the significance of the 'mailbox rule' in contract acceptance?

    Acceptance is valid when dispatched, but rejections are only effective when received.

    An offer can be terminated by the death or _______ of either the offeror or offeree.

    <p>incompetency</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cases with their key outcomes:

    <p>Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Collier White Lead Co. = No contract was formed due to untimely acceptance. Kempner v. Cohn = Facts involving a buyer's inquiry about purchasing real property.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What determines whether an acceptance is considered within a 'reasonable time'?

    <p>Market fluctuations and nature of goods</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Rejections under the mailbox rule are valid as soon as they are sent.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of offers, what happens if an offeree sends a rejection but has already mailed an acceptance?

    <p>The acceptance typically governs.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the outcome when an acceptance is mailed before a revocation is received?

    <p>The acceptance is considered effective.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Death of the offeror always terminates an outstanding offer.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What constitutes an irrevocable offer under U.C.C. § 2–205?

    <p>A signed writing by a merchant that promises to hold an offer open.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Dickinson v. Dodds, the offeree's knowledge of the offeror's sale to someone else is considered as __________.

    <p>indirect revocation</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the terms with their definitions:

    <p>Mailbox Rule = Acceptance is effective upon posting. Option Contract = An irrevocable offer for a specified time. Indirect Revocation = Knowledge of offeror’s inconsistent acts revoking an offer. Firm Offer = A merchant’s signed offer that remains open without consideration.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for an option contract to be enforceable?

    <p>Consideration.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Petterson v. Pattberg, partial performance constitutes acceptance.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What happens if a buyer accepts an offer after learning the seller has sold the property to someone else?

    <p>The acceptance is ineffective due to indirect revocation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Minnesota Linseed Oil Co., the court found that acceptance was outside a __________ time.

    <p>reasonable</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cases with their key principles:

    <p>Dickinson v. Dodds = Indirect revocation due to knowledge. Petterson v. Pattberg = Revocation can occur before performance completion. Minneapolis &amp; St. Louis Ry. Co. = Mailbox rule applicability. U.C.C. § 2–205 = Firm offer rule for merchants.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the maximum period for which a firm offer can be irrevocable under U.C.C. § 2–205?

    <p>3 months</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A verbal promise to keep an offer open is legally binding.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must a seller do to effectively revoke an offer before buyer acceptance?

    <p>The revocation must reach the buyer before they dispatch their acceptance.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does U.C.C. § 2–204 emphasize regarding contract formation?

    <p>Contract formation can occur in any manner sufficient to show agreement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Klocek v. Gateway, Inc., the court ruled that the seller's additional terms were automatically part of the contract.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What approach does the Seventh Circuit take regarding in-the-box terms in consumer contracts?

    <p>They treat in-the-box terms as part of the original offer if the consumer retains the goods.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under U.C.C. § 2–205, a firm offer does not require __________ if it is made by a merchant in a signed writing.

    <p>consideration</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which scenario does U.C.C. § 2–207 apply?

    <p>When additional terms do not contradict the original offer.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    A unilateral offer is irrevocable once performance has begun according to the classical rule.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one key difference between Hill's and Klocek's treatment of shrinkwrap terms?

    <p>Hill enforces them as part of the original offer, while Klocek requires express assent to the new terms.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Both parties must be __________ for additional terms to automatically become part of the contract under U.C.C. § 2–207.

    <p>merchants</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the Klocek decision suggest about the buyer's status in typical consumer transactions?

    <p>The buyer is usually the offeror.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The mailbox rule applies to rejections in contract law.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Identify one reason the court might reject automatic enforcement of shrinkwrap terms.

    <p>Concern over adhesion contracts and hidden clauses.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Clear termination of an offer can occur through rejection, counteroffer, __________, or death/incompetency.

    <p>lapse</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What aspect of contract law does the case of Dickinson v. Dodds focus on?

    <p>Indirect revocation.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following terms with their definitions:

    <p>Option Contract = Requires consideration to be enforceable. Firm Offer = No consideration required if from a merchant. Shrinkwrap Terms = Provisions included with a product. Battle of the Forms = Conflicting terms in contracts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Offer Termination

    • Offers can end through rejection (including counteroffers), expiration (fixed time or reasonable time), revocation by the offeror, or death/incompetence of parties.
    • A rejection is only effective when received by the offeror, not when sent. Acceptance, however, often takes effect when sent (mailbox rule).
    • A counteroffer rejects the initial offer, unless the original offeror revises or accepts it.
    • Determining if a response is a rejection or an inquiry depends on the communication's content and context.

    Case Studies (Rejection and Counteroffers)

    • Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v. Collier White Lead Co.: Acceptance by telegraph wasn't timely due to significant market fluctuations. Acceptance is valid when sent, but timeliness depends on circumstances, especially market conditions, goods' nature, and past deals. The court ruled no contract formed.
    • Kempner v. Cohn: A buyer's acceptance was timely and deemed effective upon dispatch, even if sent before revocation reached the offeror, and revocation had occurred before the acceptance arrived. This case reaffirms the mailbox rule for acceptance. Offers can be revoked before acceptance is effectively sent.
    • Dickinson v. Dodds: Knowledge that the offeror sold to another party effectively revokes the offer, even if the stated time hasn't passed yet. A promise to keep an offer open isn't binding without separate consideration (an option contract).

    Case Studies (Unilateral Contracts)

    • Petterson v. Pattberg: A unilateral contract offer can be revoked before the offeree completes the requested performance. The offeror's refusal to take the tendered payment was considered valid revocation. This demonstrates a strict classical approach to unilateral contract performance.
    • R2d §§ 45, 62: Partial performance in a unilateral contract creates an option contract (making the offer irrevocable) or a binding promise. If an offer can be accepted by promise or performance, starting performance may be considered acceptance.

    Case Studies (Counteroffers)

    • Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Columbus Rolling-Mill: A counteroffer (ordering different quantities of goods) terminates the original offer. A subsequent attempt to accept the original terms is ineffective unless the offeror renews them.
    • Livingstone v. Evans: A counteroffer that implicitly requests lower price can be seen as an inquiry, and a response stating the offeror "cannot reduce price" is considered a revival of the original offer, meaning the original offer is still valid. This contrasts with the Minneapolis case, as it shows that the offeror can explicitly choose to renew the offer.

    Option Contracts and Firm Offers

    • Option Contracts: A separate agreement to keep an offer open for a specified time, supported by independent consideration.
    • U.C.C. § 2–205 (Firm Offers): A signed writing by a merchant promising to hold an offer open is irrevocable for the stated period (or a reasonable time, maximum 3 months). No consideration is needed if a merchant provides a signed writing.
    • CISG Article 16(2): A similar rule exists relating to international sales (CISG), with an offer becoming irrevocable if it indicates irrevocability or the offeree relies on it.

    Battle of the Forms (U.C.C. § 2–207)

    • Common Law: A variance from the offer is a rejection/counteroffer, leading potentially to the "last shot" scenario.
    • U.C.C. § 2–207: Introduces a more flexible approach to the sale of goods, allowing an acceptance with additional terms to still be an acceptance. It addresses the use of different terms from the offer that are NOT material alterations.
    • C. Itoh & Co. v. Jordan Int'l Co.: This case illustrates how a seller's conditional acceptance under § 2–207(1) (not an acceptance) creates a contract by conduct under § 2–207(3), excluding any new terms on which there was no agreement.
    • Klocek v. Gateway, Inc.: Contrasting with Hill v. Gateway, this holding maintains the buyer as the offeror in consumer transactions and deems extra terms in the box as proposals instead of acceptance until explicitly assented by the buyer. This shows how contract formation and consumer protections are considered very differently between these two cases.

    Shrinkwrap, Clickwrap, and In-the-Box Terms

    • Shrinkwrap Terms: Extra terms included with the product, known only after purchasing. The buyer assenting is crucial.
    • Hill v. Gateway 2000, Inc.: Keeping the product satisfies the acceptance, meaning the in-the-box offer is accepted (regardless of new terms). Hill v Gateway held that sellers are masters of the offer, and those new terms are considered part of the initial offer.
    • Klocek v. Gateway, Inc.: The buyer's purchase of the product is considered the offer, and the seller's shipping or delivery constitutes acceptance. Extra/new terms delivered later generally require explicit assent. Klocek v Gateway held that buyers are generally offerors, and sellers acceptance is merely the delivery of the product. Terms provided later under these circumstances generally do not become part of the contract unless explicitly assented to by the buyer.

    Key Takeaways

    • Various factors can impact the validity of offers and acceptance—revocation, counteroffers, and timing are crucial.
    • Rules surrounding unilateral contracts have evolved to offer more protection and fairness to offerees.
    • U.C.C. § 2–207 modernizes the "battle of the forms" for goods, differing from the common-law mirror-image rule.
    • "Shrinkwrap" contracts have nuanced interpretations related to how consumers respond, with the courts often differing whether acceptance implicitly occurs by keeping the product or explicitly.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the nuances of offer termination in contract law, focusing on how offers can end through rejection, expiration, or revocation. This quiz examines key case studies on rejections and counteroffers, shedding light on crucial legal principles such as the mailbox rule and timely acceptance.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser