Contract Law: Intention to Create Legal Relations
48 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What phrase did the court identify as indicating that the parties did not intend to create legal relations?

  • binding in honour only (correct)
  • intended contract
  • legally binding agreement
  • binding and enforceable
  • What was the outcome of Mr. Jones' claim for the prize money?

  • It was given to another claimant
  • It was dismissed (correct)
  • It was awarded to Mr. Jones
  • It was settled out of court
  • In the case of Balfour v Balfour, why did the court reject Mrs. Balfour’s claim for the £30 allowance?

  • There was no written agreement
  • The relationship was adversarial at the time of the promise
  • The court found it was a purely domestic agreement (correct)
  • The agreement was deemed a social contract
  • What is the general presumption regarding agreements made in a social and domestic context?

    <p>They are not legally binding</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be present for the presumption of intention to create legal relations to be rebutted?

    <p>Clear evidence to the contrary</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the nature of the agreement between Mr. and Mrs. Balfour as per the court's ruling?

    <p>Non-binding domestic arrangement</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does the court usually treat agreements between spouses?

    <p>As non-binding and purely domestic</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What essential element did the court look for in the clause to dismiss Mr. Jones' claim?

    <p>Clear language indicating intent</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary presumption in contract law regarding social agreements?

    <p>They are not intended to create legal relations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what condition can the presumption against legal relations in social agreements be rebutted?

    <p>If there is clear evidence of mutual intention to be legally bound.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What key aspect did the court consider in determining if Ms. Simpkins was entitled to a share of the prize money?

    <p>The intention to create legal relations demonstrated by mutual obligations.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the main reason the court upheld the contract in Doyle v White City Stadium?

    <p>The contract was deemed beneficial to Doyle.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Wilson v Barnett, what did the court find about the conversation regarding sharing winnings?

    <p>It was too vague and informal to be binding.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must be present for an agreement to be legally binding, according to the rule outlined in the content?

    <p>Intention to create legal relations, clear terms, and consideration.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements best describes voidable contracts concerning minors?

    <p>They can be repudiated while still being a minor or shortly after reaching adulthood.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the case of Doyle v White City Stadium illustrate regarding contracts with minors?

    <p>Contracts can be binding if they are in the minor's best interest.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Wilson v Barnett regarding the enforceability of the agreement?

    <p>There was insufficient evidence to prove a binding oral agreement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which aspect of an agreement is NOT sufficient to establish a contract?

    <p>The mere fact of an agreement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is NOT an example of a contract that is typically voidable by minors?

    <p>Employment contracts.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What was a significant factor in the court's decision regarding Doyle’s contract?

    <p>The potential for financial gain through boxing.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What did the objective test applied by the court consider in Ms. Simpkins' case?

    <p>The perspective of a reasonable person regarding mutual intention.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does the principle of protecting minors in contract law emphasize?

    <p>Contracts that do not substantially benefit the minor can be voided.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the context of contract law, what is meant by a contract being 'for the benefit of a minor'?

    <p>The terms are favorable for the minor's financial benefit.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why are contracts involving minors categorized as voidable?

    <p>Minors can choose to affirm or reject them.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the primary task of the judge when a contract is made in complete oral form?

    <p>To find out which exact words were used.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What factor will likely influence a court's view on whether a statement is an expressed term of a contract?

    <p>The timing of the statement in relation to the contract.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In the case of Routledge v McKay (1954), why was the buyer's claim ruled against?

    <p>Too much time had passed between the statement and its discovery.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which situation indicates that a statement may be considered a term in a contract?

    <p>The buyer would not have entered the contract without the statement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does Bannerman v White (1861) illustrate about statements made during negotiations?

    <p>Statements regarding significant details can become terms.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of term arises from statutes in certain commercial situations?

    <p>Implied terms.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    If there is a significant gap between the making of a statement and the contract, what is the court's likely stance?

    <p>They will more likely dismiss it as a term.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What can indicate the importance of a statement in forming a contract?

    <p>The specificity of the statement.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the main purpose of the parol evidence rule?

    <p>To prevent any external evidence that alters a written contract</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In which scenario might a court imply a term into a contract?

    <p>When the express terms of a contract render it meaningless without additional context</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might the courts be hesitant to imply a term into a contract?

    <p>They do not write contracts for the parties involved</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one of the limitations the court considers when implying terms?

    <p>There should not be an overwhelming number of details</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What can justify the establishment of an enforceable right by customs?

    <p>A longstanding practice recognized within a particular trade</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How did the court rule in the case of Hutton v Warren (1836)?

    <p>The tenant was entitled to compensation for unreaped crops.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What outcome occurred in the Moorcock (1889) case regarding implied terms?

    <p>The court implied a term for the safety of the boat.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might external evidence be excluded in contract disputes?

    <p>It can complicate the clarity of intentions.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What must exist between the parties to establish a duty of care?

    <p>A fiduciary relationship of trust and confidence</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Under what circumstance can reliance on information be deemed reasonable?

    <p>When the specific information pertains to a financial decision</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is required for a claim in negligent misrepresentation?

    <p>The person making the statement has some specialist knowledge</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What does a disclaimer provided by a party do in a legal context?

    <p>Potentially excludes liability if deemed sufficient</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following conditions is NOT mandatory for a claim in negligent misrepresentation?

    <p>A special relationship (proximity) among the parties</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In what scenario can pure economic loss be recoverable in tort?

    <p>When a duty of care is established</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What characterizes an innocent misrepresentation?

    <p>The representor believes the fact to be true with reasonable grounds</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is necessary for a party to be held liable for resulting economic loss?

    <p>Demonstrating a special knowledge or skill</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    • Legal obligations are created by a person (legal entity) towards another person.
    • Legal entities can be a corporation, a legal person, a company, association, society.
    • A legal entity is anything that can sue or be sued.
    • A dog is not a legal entity, a tree is not, but a company or government is.

    Law of Obligations

    • The law of obligations deals with legal obligations of entities.
    • The module is divided into 2 parts: contract law and tort law.

    Part 1: Contract Law

    • Contract law involves obligations created by a contract.
    • This includes what obligations are placed on the parties, and what happens if a party breaches the contract.
    • Principles of contract termination.
    • Principles of remedies in contract law

    Part 2: Tort/Tort Law

    • Tort law involves obligations created by law that are imposed by a particular entity.
    • This includes duty of care and torts such as trespassing.

    Exam Format

    • Exam is split in two parts.
    • Solve only one part per exam.
    • Read questions carefully, and answer only short-answer problems/ no essays.
    • Exam problems can be 100% contract law or 100% tort law.
    • Questions may be mixed, containing contract and tort law principles.

    Contract Definition

    • A contract is an agreement between two or more people that is legally obligated.
    • It involves terms that are agreed upon by the entities.
    • Agreements create obligations, recognized by law.
    • Required elements of contract: Formal legally binding agreement with terms and conditions agreed by all involved entities.

    Founding Principles of Contract Law

    The Form of a Contract

    • Many assume contracts must be written, but they can be written, oral, or partly written and partly oral.

    Freedom of Contract

    • Parties are free to make their own contract terms.
    • Unfair terms are not universally applicable.

    Binding Terms of a Contract

    • All parties acknowledge that the contract obligates them and are legally bound by those terms.
    • Parties must honor the contractual terms or they may be liable for damages.

    Meeting of the Minds

    • All parties should agree on the terms and be legally bound by the contract.

    Formation of a Contract

    • There are five elements required for contract formation: offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to be legally bound, and capacity.

    Offer

    • An offer is the initial proposal made by one party (offeror) to another party (offeree).
    • The offer can be made to a specific person or to the world at large.
    • Clear, precise, and capable of acceptance.

    Offers in Unilateral Contracts

    • A unilateral contract is an offer made to the world at large.
    • Acceptance occurs only through performance, not by a promise.

    The Case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co Ltd

    • An advertisement can constitute an offer in a unilateral contract, if it contains sufficiently clear terms and intent to be legally bound.

    Distinguishing Between Offer and Invitation to Treat

    • Invitation to treat: Shows willingness to negotiate or receive offers. Examples are displays of goods in a shop window.
    • Offer: A definite proposal to be bound. Examples involve customer presenting the item at the checkout in a self-service store.

    Fisher v Bell (1961)

    • Display of goods in a shop window is an invitation to treat.

    Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (1953)

    • Display of goods in a self-service store is an invitation to treat. The offer is made by the customer at the checkout.

    When is an offer valid?

    • An offer is valid when brought to the attention of the offeree (the one receiving it), and has to take effect in the way it was set by the offeror.

    Termination of an Offer

    • Possible ways to end an offer (3 possible outcomes): acceptance, rejection, counter-offer, lapse of time, death of the offeror, revocation, and the condition becoming impossible.

    Counteroffer

    • Counteroffers reject original offers and are a new offer in themselves.

    Lapse of time

    • Unspecified offers have a reasonable time limit.

    Conditional Offers

    • Offers that are dependent on some event.

    Death of the Offeror

    • The offer terminates when the offeror dies.

    Revocation

    • An offeror can revoke an offer anytime up until acceptance.
    • The revocation must be communicated effectively to the offeree.

    Acceptance

    • The acceptance must match the offer unconditionally.
    • It must be unequivocal (clear and unambiguous).

    Postal Rule on Acceptance

    • Acceptance is valid when the letter is properly posted, not when it is received.

    Consideration

    • Consideration is something of value exchanged between the parties within a valid contract.
    • Must be sufficient but not necessarily of equivalent value.

    Requirements of Consideration (6)

    • Sufficient but doesn't have to be of equal value.
    • Must not be passed. Consideration must follow the contract, not precede it.
    • Doing an existing duty cannot constitute consideration for a contract.
    • Partial payment of debt doesn't extinguish full debt obligation.
    • Performance of the existing contractual duty.
    • Performing or offering to perform an existing contractual obligation is not normally sufficient consideration.

    Exception to the rule on part payment of debt

    • Accord and satisfaction. This is when a different consideration is introduced to discharge the contract from original obligation.
    • There's a presumption that social and domestic agreements aren't legally binding unless clear evidence exists to the contrary.
    • Family or friendship agreements are not contracts, unless it can be objectively reasoned as legally binding agreements.
    • There's a strong presumption that commercial agreements are legally binding.

    Capacity

    • Parties must have legal capacity to enter into contracts.
    • Protected groups include minors, people with mental difficulties, and intoxicated individuals.

    Contracts with Minors

    • Valid contracts: contracts for essential goods and services in line with minor's station and needs
    • Voidable contracts: contracts a minor can be freed from
    • Unenforceable contracts: contracts that are not necessary for the minor's station

    People with Mental Difficulties

    • Contracts lacking capacity due to mental impairment.
    • Agreements can be voidable if a party wasn't of sound mind at the time of entering into the contract, and the other party was aware.
    • Contract can be voided if mental incapacity was present when the contract was made.

    Terms of a Contract

    • Contract terms that are expressly stated.
    • Terms that are implied by law due to customs, by the court, or by statutes.

    Types of Terms (2)

    • Conditions: Critical terms, breach of which results in the whole contract being void.
    • Warranties: Less significant terms, breach of which only entitles damages, and not termination of the contract.

    Exemption Clauses

    • Clauses that limit or exclude liability.
    • Courts must determine whether the clause is a binding contractual term.

    Rules of Incorporation (3)

    • How exemption clauses become part of a contract.
    • Signature: Party signing a document is bound by its terms, regardless of whether they read them.
    • Notice: Adequate notice must be given before or at the time the contract is formed.
    • Previous course of dealings: Parties previously contracted on similar terms, with similar clauses.

    Vitiating Factors

    • Factors that make a contract void or voidable (3)
    • Misrepresentation: false statement, inducing the other party.
    • Mistake: misunderstanding about fundamental facts.
    • Duress: coercion or threats.
    • Undue influence: improper pressure, exploiting trust.

    Elements of Negligence in Misrepresentation

    • Knowledge of falsity.
    • Proximity of parties.
    • Reliance on the statement.
    • Responsibility/Duty to advise

    Remedies for Misrepresentation

    • Recession: contract is terminated.
    • Damages: compensate for loss.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Law of Obligations Complete PDF

    Description

    This quiz explores key principles of contract law, particularly focusing on cases like Balfour v Balfour and the basic presumption surrounding agreements made in social contexts. Test your knowledge of legal relations and the court’s interpretation of social and domestic agreements through various critical questions.

    More Like This

    Comfort Letters and Legal Relations
    18 questions
    Intention to Create Legal Relations Quiz
    8 questions
    Contract Law in Scotland
    17 questions

    Contract Law in Scotland

    WholesomeSplendor6015 avatar
    WholesomeSplendor6015
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser