Podcast
Questions and Answers
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the concept of 'consideration' in contract law?
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the concept of 'consideration' in contract law?
- An agreement where one party offers to sell a car for $5,000, and the other party accepts the offer. (correct)
- A promise to donate money to a charity without any expectation of receiving anything in return.
- Performing a pre-existing duty that one is already legally obligated to do.
- A past act that was not done in exchange for a present promise.
In a commercial agreement, what presumption exists regarding the 'intention to create legal relations,' and under what circumstances might this presumption be challenged?
In a commercial agreement, what presumption exists regarding the 'intention to create legal relations,' and under what circumstances might this presumption be challenged?
- There is a strong presumption of intent, which can only be challenged with explicit written disclaimers.
- There is a strong presumption of intent, but it can be rebutted with evidence suggesting the agreement was made in jest or without serious intention to be bound. (correct)
- There is no initial presumption; the intent must always be proven affirmatively, irrespective of the commercial context.
- There is a weak presumption of intent, easily challenged by presenting evidence of a handshake agreement.
What is the key difference between a 'void' and a 'voidable' contract, and which of the following situations exemplifies a voidable contract?
What is the key difference between a 'void' and a 'voidable' contract, and which of the following situations exemplifies a voidable contract?
- Both are equally invalid from the beginning; a contract with terms that are manifestly unfair.
- A void contract is valid until challenged; a voidable contract is never valid from the beginning; a contract with a minor.
- A void contract involves illegal subject matter; a voidable contract involves misrepresentation; a contract for gambling where it's illegal.
- A void contract is invalid from the outset; a voidable contract is valid until canceled by a party; a contract entered into under duress. (correct)
Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the postal rule in contract law?
Which of the following statements is most accurate regarding the postal rule in contract law?
How do 'conditions' and 'warranties' differ in contract law, and what is the primary consequence of breaching a condition?
How do 'conditions' and 'warranties' differ in contract law, and what is the primary consequence of breaching a condition?
Which of the following scenarios is most likely to be considered a 'unilateral mistake' that could render a contract void?
Which of the following scenarios is most likely to be considered a 'unilateral mistake' that could render a contract void?
What distinguishes 'fraudulent misrepresentation' from 'innocent misrepresentation,' and what remedies are typically available to the injured party in cases of fraudulent misrepresentation?
What distinguishes 'fraudulent misrepresentation' from 'innocent misrepresentation,' and what remedies are typically available to the injured party in cases of fraudulent misrepresentation?
Under what circumstances might 'economic duress' render a contract voidable, and what key element must be present to establish economic duress?
Under what circumstances might 'economic duress' render a contract voidable, and what key element must be present to establish economic duress?
What is 'specific performance' as a remedy for breach of contract, and in what situations is a court most likely to grant it?
What is 'specific performance' as a remedy for breach of contract, and in what situations is a court most likely to grant it?
What is the legal concept of 'frustration' in contract law, and what conditions must be met for a contract to be discharged due to frustration?
What is the legal concept of 'frustration' in contract law, and what conditions must be met for a contract to be discharged due to frustration?
Flashcards
Contract
Contract
A legally binding agreement enforceable in a court of law.
Offer (in contract law)
Offer (in contract law)
A clear promise to be bound by specific terms.
Acceptance
Acceptance
Unconditional agreement to the offer's exact terms, communicated to the offeror.
Consideration
Consideration
Signup and view all the flashcards
Intention to Create Legal Relations
Intention to Create Legal Relations
Signup and view all the flashcards
Terms of a Contract
Terms of a Contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
Misrepresentation
Misrepresentation
Signup and view all the flashcards
Duress
Duress
Signup and view all the flashcards
Breach of Contract
Breach of Contract
Signup and view all the flashcards
Frustration (of contract)
Frustration (of contract)
Signup and view all the flashcards
Study Notes
- A contract is a legally binding agreement
- Governed by contract law, it is enforceable in a court of law.
- Contract law deals with the rights and obligations established by agreements, addressing issues like formation, validity, and breach
Formation of Contracts
- Formation requires several key elements: offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations, and certainty of terms
- The 'offer' must be a clear, definite promise to be bound, made with the intention that it becomes binding upon acceptance
- It can be made to a specific person, or to the world at large
- An 'invitation to treat' is merely an invitation to make an offer and is not an offer itself
Acceptance
- Acceptance must be unconditional and communicated to the offeror
- It must exactly mirror the offer's terms (the "mirror image rule")
- Any variation constitutes a counter-offer, which voids the original offer
- Acceptance can be communicated explicitly (e.g. verbally or in writing) or implied through conduct
- The postal rule: acceptance is effective when the acceptance letter is properly posted, not when it is received
- The postal rule does not apply to instantaneous forms of communication like email or telephone
Consideration
- Consideration is something of value (can be a promise) bargained for in exchange for a promise
- It can be a benefit to the promisor or a detriment to the promisee
- It must be sufficient but need not be adequate
- Sufficiency means the law recognizes it as having some value
- Adequacy relates to its market value, which courts generally do not examine
- Past consideration is generally not good consideration
Intention to Create Legal Relations
- Parties must intend their agreement to be legally binding
- In commercial agreements, there is a strong presumption that the parties intend to create legal relations
- In social or domestic agreements, the opposite is presumed, although it can be rebutted with sufficient evidence
- Letters of comfort are common in commercial settings
- They provide reassurance about a party's ability to fulfill its obligations, but without a legal guarantee
- Whether a letter of comfort is binding depends on its wording and the intention of the parties
Terms of a Contract
- These are the promises and obligations that each party agrees to
- They can be express (explicitly stated) or implied (not expressly stated but assumed)
- Express terms are those specifically agreed upon by the parties, either orally or in writing
- Implied terms can arise from custom, statute, or the intentions of the parties
- Terms can be classified as conditions, warranties, or intermediate terms
- Conditions are essential to the contract and their breach allows the injured party to terminate the contract and claim damages
- Warranties are less important terms, and their breach only allows the injured party to claim damages
- Intermediate terms can be treated as either conditions or warranties depending on the severity of the breach
Void and Voidable Contracts
- A void contract is one that is not legally binding from the outset
- A voidable contract is one that is initially valid but can be canceled by one or more parties under certain circumstances
- Mistake, misrepresentation, duress, and undue influence can affect the validity of a contract
Mistake
- A mistake is an incorrect understanding by one or more parties
- Common mistake: both parties make the same mistake about a fundamental fact
- Mutual mistake: both parties are mistaken, but about different things
- Unilateral mistake: one party is mistaken, and the other party knows or ought to know about the mistake
- A common mistake renders a contract void if it concerns the existence or fundamental quality of the subject matter
- A unilateral mistake may make a contract void if it relates to the identity of the other contracting party and identity is important
Misrepresentation
- It is a false statement of fact made by one party to another that induces that party to enter into the contract
- It can be fraudulent (deliberate), negligent (careless), or innocent
- Fraudulent misrepresentation allows the injured party to rescind the contract and claim damages
- Negligent misrepresentation also allows recession and damages
- Innocent misrepresentation may only allow recession
Duress
- Occurs when one party is forced into a contract against their will, through threats or coercion
- Physical duress makes a contract voidable
- Economic duress can also make a contract voidable if illegitimate pressure is applied
Undue influence
- It involves one party taking advantage of a position of power over another
- Actual undue influence requires proof that the stronger party actually exerted influence
- Presumed undue influence arises in certain relationships (e.g. solicitor-client) where one party is presumed to have influence over the other
Illegality
- An illegal contract is one that is prohibited by statute or common law
- It is generally void
- Contracts to commit a crime or contracts that restrain trade may be illegal
Capacity to Contract
- Certain individuals or entities may have limited capacity to enter into contracts
- Minors (those under the age of majority)
- Corporations (acting beyond their powers)
- Individuals with mental disabilities
Breach of Contract
- It occurs when one party fails to perform their obligations as specified in the contract
- It can be actual (the breach has already occurred) or anticipatory (one party indicates they will not perform)
- Remedies for breach of contract include damages, specific performance, and recession
Damages
- Monetary compensation awarded to the injured party to compensate for their losses
- The aim is to put the injured party in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed
- Damages must be reasonably foreseeable and caused by the breach
- Remoteness of damage limits the extent of recoverable damages to those that naturally arise from the breach
Specific Performance
- A court order requiring the breaching party to perform their contractual obligations
- It is only granted when damages are inadequate
- Typically used in contracts for the sale of land or unique goods
Recession
- The cancellation of a contract, restoring the parties to their pre-contractual positions
- It is available in cases of mistake, misrepresentation, duress, or undue influence
- Equitable remedy and is discretionary
Frustration
- Occurs when an unforeseen event makes performance of the contract impossible or radically different from what was intended
- The event must not be the fault of either party
- Examples include destruction of the subject matter, government intervention, or personal incapacity
- Frustration discharges the contract, releasing the parties from future obligations
Studying That Suits You
Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.