Constitutional Review Models Quiz

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

Which type of decision allows for the future implementation of a statute to comply with the Constitution?

  • Declatory Decision
  • Interpretative Decision (correct)
  • Annulment - ab initio
  • Appellate Decision

In which model of constitutional review are all regular courts able to pass review?

  • Austrian Model
  • American Model (correct)
  • Centralised Model
  • Hybrid Model

What distinguishes the Austrian Model in terms of the review process compared to the Hybrid Model?

  • It allows only a posteriori review
  • It uses specialized ad hoc Constitutional Court (correct)
  • It supports only principaliter proceedings
  • It is based on decentralized review

What is a key feature of an appellate decision regarding the Legislature?

<p>It may ask the Legislature to adopt certain provisions (A)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Which model of constitutional review allows for both a priori and a posteriori reviews?

<p>Hybrid Model (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards

Cassation Decision (Annulment)

A decision by a constitutional court that completely annuls (cancels) a law or regulation, making it void from the beginning (as if it never existed).

Abrogation Decision

A decision by a constitutional court that declares a law or regulation invalid, but only for the future, meaning it remains valid for past actions.

Interpretative Decision

A decision by a constitutional court that clarifies the meaning of a law or regulation, without striking it down.

Decentralized Review (American Model)

A model of constitutional review where any regular court can review the constitutionality of laws.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Centralized Review (Austrian Model)

A model of constitutional review where a specialized constitutional court is responsible for reviewing laws.

Signup and view all the flashcards

Study Notes

Cassation Decisions

  • Annulment can be ab initio (from the beginning).
  • Abrogation is prospective.
  • A declaratory decision is possible.
  • It can be preventative.
  • Appellate decisions can involve the Constitutional Court appealing to the Legislature for specific provisions (explicitly, implicitly, with or without a time limit).

Interpretative Decisions

  • The Constitutional Court can use its interpretation to ensure future implementations of a statute comply with the Constitution.

Models of Constitutional Review

American Model

  • Decentralized review: all regular courts can review laws.
  • Incidenter review: occurs during regular court proceedings.
  • A posteriori review: review happens after a law is enacted.

Austrian Model

  • Centralized review: a specialized Constitutional Court handles reviews.
  • Principaliter review: special procedures are used.
  • A priori/a posteriori review: both before and after enactment.

Hybrid Model

  • Centralized review: a specialized Constitutional Court handles constitutional matters.
  • Principaliter/incidenter review: special or regular court proceedings.
  • A priori/a posteriori review: before and after enactment.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Constitutional Law: Judicial Review
10 questions
Judicial Review and Constitutional Law
10 questions
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser