Constitutional Judge Appointment Systems
16 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

How are Supreme Court judges appointed in the United States?

  • Appointed by the legislature exclusively
  • Appointed by the President with Senate consent (correct)
  • Nominated by the judiciary
  • Elected by the public
  • What criteria does the President consider when nominating a Supreme Court judge?

  • Political affiliation, legal theory, expertise
  • Length of legal experience and academic performance
  • Public popularity and previous rulings
  • Geographical origin, gender, religion, race (correct)
  • What is the term length for judges appointed in Germany?

  • Lifetime appointment
  • 8 years renewable
  • 12 years non-renewable (correct)
  • 10 years with possibility for renewal
  • What major difference exists between the appointment systems of the US and Germany?

    <p>US judges are appointed by the executive, while German judges are elected by the legislature</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which committee plays a crucial role in the confirmation of a Supreme Court nomination in the US?

    <p>The Senate Judiciary Committee</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which statement is true about the political influence on the appointment of judges in the US?

    <p>The President seeks judges aligned with their ideological viewpoint</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a significant advantage of the mixed-system for appointing constitutional judges?

    <p>It promotes diversity in judicial backgrounds and perspectives.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How are judges for Germany's Federal Constitutional Court appointed?

    <p>Elected by the Bundestag and Bundesrat with a two-thirds majority</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the underlying legal system followed by the United States?

    <p>Common Law</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following describes a drawback of the mixed-system for judicial appointments?

    <p>It may lead to lengthy vacancies and delays.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which countries use a mixed-system for appointing constitutional judges?

    <p>Italy and Austria</p> Signup and view all the answers

    How does the mixed-system maintain democratic accountability?

    <p>Through the involvement of elected officials in the appointment process.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What issue can arise from the shared authority in the mixed-system?

    <p>Confusion regarding accountability for judicial appointments.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is one characteristic of judicial appointments in the United States compared to Germany?

    <p>Judges in the US have lifetime appointments.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Why might the public find it challenging to hold the judiciary accountable in a mixed-system?

    <p>Multiple bodies are involved in appointments, leading to shared responsibility.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What outcome can occur from deadlocks in the mixed-system during judicial appointments?

    <p>Judicial vacancies remain unfilled, causing operational issues.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Constitutional Judge Appointment Systems

    • Three systems exist: executive appointment, legislative election, and a mixed system.

    Executive Appointment (e.g., US)

    • President appoints judges with Senate consent.
    • President considers legal expertise, and attempts to ensure diversity by considering factors like geographical origin, gender, religion, and race (though political alignment is often a factor).
    • Nomination is debated and voted upon by the Senate Judiciary Committee and the full Senate.
    • Confirmed nominees serve lifetime appointments.
    • President holds significant influence.
    • Common law system allows for more independent judicial rulings, potentially influenced by the President's political ideology.

    Legislative Election (e.g., Germany)

    • Legislature (Bundestag and Bundesrat) elect judges.
    • Two-thirds majority required for election.
    • Judges formally appointed by the Federal President.
    • Judges serve 12-year non-renewable terms.
    • System is arguably more relevant for civil law due to public examinations.
    • Legislature holds greater influence.

    Mixed System (e.g., Italy)

    • Combines elements of executive and legislative appointment.
    • Often involves input from the executive, legislature, and judiciary.
    • Example: Italy appoints judges via a joint session, Presidential appointment, and by current Supreme Court members.
    • Benefits include diverse representation, political independence, and greater accountability.
    • However, can be complex, slow, and lead to deadlock, particularly with issues of shared responsibility, influence, and effective functioning.

    Comparisons and Criticisms

    • US executive appointment: President retains considerable influence but process inherently includes input from Senate.
    • German legislative election: Greater legislature influence; however, more transparent with voting criteria.
    • Mixed systems: Balance of power among different branches but can face gridlock, uneven power distribution, and problems of accountability in implementing the appointments given complexities involved.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    This quiz explores the different systems of appointing constitutional judges, including executive appointment, legislative election, and mixed systems. It covers the processes in the US and Germany, highlighting key factors like political influence, term lengths, and the role of government bodies involved in the appointments.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser