Constitutional Interpretation Principles
10 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What was the basis of the application with regards to the Abortion and Sterilisation Act?

  • The Act was inconsistent with the Bill of Rights
  • The Act was declared unconstitutional
  • The Act was repealed by the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act (correct)
  • The Act was abrogated by disuse (correct)
  • What is the legal issue in this case regarding the demise of legislation?

  • The application of the Interpretations Act (correct)
  • The repeal of the Abortion and Sterilisation Act
  • The retrospectivity of the Constitution
  • The severance of unconstitutional provisions
  • What is the principle that guides the interpretation of legislation?

  • Legislation should be interpreted in accordance with existing law (correct)
  • Legislation should be interpreted to favour the common law
  • Legislation should be interpreted in isolation
  • Legislation should be interpreted to change the existing law as much as possible
  • What is the assumption when interpreting a subsequent Act?

    <p>The legislature did not intend to repeal or modify the earlier Act</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the consequence of not repealing or modifying the earlier Act?

    <p>The legislation must be interpreted in the light of the common law rules</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the court's holding regarding the Abortion and Sterilisation Act?

    <p>The Act remains in force until repealed or declared unconstitutional</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the relevance of the trial commencing before the repeal of the Act?

    <p>The trial must be completed as if there had been no repeal</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the significance of the Constitution in this case?

    <p>The Constitution is not retrospective</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the implication of the legislature changing the common law?

    <p>The legislature must do so in a way that leaves no doubt that the new legislation has replaced the old common law</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the case law that supports the presumption that legislation does not intend to change the existing law more than is necessary?

    <p>Both (a) and (b)</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Principles of Constitutional Interpretation

    • Courts should try to keep legislation constitutional and valid as far as possible.
    • The principle of "reading in" is used to change legislation to make it constitutional.

    Reading In

    • A more drastic remedy used by courts to change legislation to keep it constitutional.
    • The court "reads" something into a provision to rescue it or a part of it.
    • Should be applied with caution, as the court changes the legislation.

    National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs

    • The court laid down principles to be considered before "reading in" or severance:
      • Results must be consistent with the Constitution and its values.
      • Results must interfere with the existing law as little as possible.
      • Courts must define with sufficient precision how the legislative meaning should be modified.
      • Courts should be faithful to the legislative scheme within the constraints of the Constitution.
      • The remedy should not result in an unsupportable budgetary intrusion.
    • The court held that the constitutional defect in Section 25(5) of the Aliens Control Act can be cured by "reading in" the words "or partner, in a permanent same-sex life partnership" after the word "spouse".

    Severance

    • The opposite of "reading in", where the court tries to rescue a provision from being unconstitutional by cutting out the offending part.
    • The goal is to keep the remainder of the provision constitutional and valid.

    Invalidation of Legislation

    • The High Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, or Constitutional Court may declare legislation unconstitutional in terms of Section 172 of the Constitution.
    • Legislation cannot be abrogated by disuse and remains in force until repealed or declared unconstitutional.

    Presumption of Legislation

    • Legislation should be interpreted in a way that is in accordance with existing law, changing it as little as possible.
    • The legislature is free to change the common law, but must do so in a way that leaves no doubt that the new legislation has replaced the old common law.
    • If the legislature does not clearly indicate a change, the presumption applies and legislation must be interpreted in the light of the common law rules.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Description

    This quiz covers the principles of constitutional interpretation, including the role of courts in keeping legislation valid and the concept of 'reading in' to change legislation.

    More Like This

    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser