25 Questions
What is the purpose of Composite Business Keys in Hubs?
To unify different business keys from various sources
What is an alternative approach to handling different business key structures in hubs?
Same-as-Link (SAL) in BV
Why is creating multiple hubs for each key structure considered less efficient?
It complicates the data integration process
Composite Business Keys in Hubs allow a concept to have the same business key in different sources and tables.
False
Same-as-Link (SAL) is the only way to extend the concept of Composite Business Keys in Hubs.
False
Creating multiple hubs for each key structure is always considered less efficient.
False
Match the following concepts with their descriptions:
Composite Business Keys in Hubs = Allowing a concept to have different business keys in different sources and tables Same-as-Link (SAL) = An alternative extension for Composite Business Keys in Hubs in the context of BV Multiple hubs for each key structure = A less efficient but still valid approach for handling different business key structures in hubs Flow.BI = Collects different structures and unionizes them to handle different business key structures in hubs
What is the purpose of using Composite Business Keys in Hubs?
To uniquely identify a record in a database using multiple attributes
Why might a single attribute like an employee ID not be enough to ensure uniqueness in a table storing employee information?
Employees can work in different departments
What is the trade-off when using a single hub to cover all business keys?
Structural differences in business keys
What is the alternative approach to handling different business key structures in hubs?
Creating multiple hubs for each key structure
What do composite business keys refer to in a database table?
A combination of two or more attributes uniquely identifying a record
Why might a single attribute like an employee ID not be enough to ensure uniqueness in a table storing employee information?
Employees can work in different departments
What is the most efficient design for handling different business key structures?
Creating one hub per business key structure
Composite business keys refer to a combination of two or more attributes within a database table that, together, uniquely identify a record in a database.
True
In a table that stores information about employees, a single attribute like an employee ID might be enough to ensure uniqueness, especially if employees can work in different departments.
False
It is possible to adjust the rules in order to generate one hub per business key structure or other designs, but the standard design is considered the most efficient.
True
Creating multiple hubs for each key structure is always considered less efficient.
False
Same-as-Link (SAL) is the only way to extend the concept of Composite Business Keys in Hubs.
False
Composite Business Keys in Hubs allow a concept to have the same business key in different sources and tables.
True
Using multiple columns or attributes rather than a single attribute to uniquely identify a record within a table is the purpose of using Composite Business Keys in Hubs.
True
Match the following terms with their descriptions:
Composite Business Keys = Combination of two or more attributes within a database table that uniquely identify a record Multiple Hubs = Design approach generating one hub with maximum columns to cover all business keys Standard Design = Believed to be the most efficient approach for handling different business key structures Same-as-Link (SAL) = Alternative approach to generating one hub per business key structure or other designs
Match the following scenarios with their corresponding need for Composite Business Keys:
Employee ID and Department ID = Ensuring uniqueness for employees working in different departments Single attribute like an employee ID = Insufficient for ensuring uniqueness in a table storing employee information Combination of two or more attributes within a database table = Uniquely identifying a record in a database Multiple columns or attributes = Uniquely identifying a record within a table
Match the following design approaches with their descriptions:
Multiple Hubs for each key structure = Considered a trade-off due to potential inefficiency Adjusting rules to generate one hub per business key structure = Possible alternative to standard design for efficiency Standard Design = Believed to be the most efficient approach for handling different business key structures Same-as-Link (SAL) = An extension of the concept of Composite Business Keys in Hubs
Match the following statements with their corresponding implications:
Using multiple columns or attributes rather than a single attribute = Purpose of using Composite Business Keys in Hubs Creating multiple hubs for each key structure = Considered less efficient in the standard design Adjusting rules to generate one hub per business key structure = Potential adjustment to the standard design for efficiency Belief in the standard design as the most efficient = Implication of the approach for handling different business key structures
Learn about composite business keys in hubs, where a concept can have different business keys in different sources. Understand how Flow.BI collects and unionizes different structures. Explore the concept of Same-as-Link (SAL) in BV and alternative configuration rules.
Make Your Own Quizzes and Flashcards
Convert your notes into interactive study material.
Get started for free