Common Law vs. Civil Law Systems
23 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What is a primary source of law in Common Law systems?

  • Judicial precedents (correct)
  • Codified regulations
  • Legislative acts
  • Statutory law
  • Judicial precedents in Civil Law systems are legally binding.

    False

    What does the term 'stare decisis' refer to?

    The doctrine of using judicial precedents to guide decisions in court cases.

    Judicial precedents are considered a valuable legal source in __________ Law systems.

    <p>Common</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following aspects with the appropriate legal system:

    <p>Common Law = Judges can establish new legal precedents Civil Law = Judges serve as interpreters of laws Judicial precedents = Binding in Common Law, not in Civil Law Legislative acts = Main source of authority in Civil Law</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following best describes the role of judges in Civil Law systems?

    <p>Endorsing laws created by the legislature</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Judges in Common Law systems are appointed by elected officials.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to Montesquieu, how are courts described in Civil Law systems?

    <p>As the 'bouche de la loi', meaning 'mouth of the law'.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following systems does the United States use for appointing Supreme Court judges?

    <p>Appointment based system</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Judges in the United States serve for fixed terms and have age limits.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is the term length for judges appointed in Germany's system?

    <p>12 years</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Germany, the Federal Constitutional Court is made up of ______ judges.

    <p>16</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the country with its judge appointment system:

    <p>United States = Appointment based system Germany = Election based system Italy = Mixed system Austria = Mixed system</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which factors must be considered by the U.S. President when appointing a Supreme Court judge?

    <p>Geographical origin, gender, religion, race</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The mixed-system of appointing judges can lead to quick and efficient appointments.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What type of system does Italy use for appointing constitutional judges?

    <p>Mixed system</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In a mixed-system, democratic accountability is maintained through the participation of ______.

    <p>elected officials</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following is a disadvantage of a mixed-system for appointing judges?

    <p>Can create deadlocks</p> Signup and view all the answers

    In Austria, the Federal Government and Parliament participate in the appointment of judges.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Who officially appoints judges in Germany after they are elected?

    <p>Federal President</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The political element of judicial nominations in the U.S. arises primarily from the ______ system.

    <p>Common Law</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the type of appointment system to its description:

    <p>Appointment based = Judges serve a lifetime appointment Election based = Judges are elected by legislature Mixed system = Combines appointment and merit-based processes Civil Law = Focus on foundational legal theory</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key aspect of the Common Law system?

    <p>Judicial precedent</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Common Law vs. Civil Law Systems

    • Common Law systems rely on judicial precedents (stare decisis) for legal rulings, viewing them as binding precedents from prior cases, especially higher courts.
    • Civil Law systems prioritize codified regulations, statutory law, and legislative acts as primary legal sources, emphasizing legal theory.
    • Judges in Common Law systems are active in shaping legal principles and precedents, playing a role in societal adaptation. Appointments often use elected officials.
    • Judges in Civil Law systems are interpreters of existing law, focused on legal theory and codified laws. Appointments often involve public examinations.

    Role of Judges in Different Systems

    • Common Law judges, like in the UK, are vital for applying and interpreting precedents. Their decisions establish new legal precedents and adapt to societal norms. Often directly or indirectly appointed by elected officials.
    • Civil Law judges, inspired by Montesquieu's view, are considered the "mouth of the law" interpreting existing laws. Appointments based on legal theory often involve public exams.

    Constitutional Judge Appointment Systems

    • Appointment systems vary across countries.
      • Appointment-based: The executive (e.g., President) appoints judges with legislative input (e.g., Senate confirmation). Example: United States.
      • Election-based: The legislature elects or significantly influences judge appointment. Example: Germany.
      • Mixed-system: Combines elements of both appointment and election. Example: Italy.
    • Mixed-systems balance diverse perspectives and democratic accountability but can be complex and slow. Issues like deadlock are possible.
    • US presidential appointment prioritizes legal expertise and (often assumed) political alignment without formally considering it, contrasted to Germany's legislature-led elections based method.
    • Mixed systems like Italy involve multiple branches creating potential for delays and disputes.

    US Appointment System (Example)

    • US Supreme Court judges appointed by the President, confirmed by the Senate.
    • Criteria for nomination include legal expertise but often involve political considerations.
    • Lifetime appointments grant significant influence to the President.

    Germany Appointment System (Example)

    • German Constitutional Court judges are elected by the legislature (Bundestag & Bundesrat).
    • Judges serve fixed terms and have age limits.
    • Emphasizes expertise in legal theory, reflected in public examination processes.

    Mixed System Example (Italy)

    • Judges appointed through a combined process involving the executive, legislature, and judiciary which creates a balancing mechanism but can produce delays.
    • Multiple bodies involve creating more bureaucracy but may be beneficial in diverse selections.
    • Italy's example highlights potential for gridlock in the appointment processes which can hinder judicial court function.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Description

    Explore the fundamental differences between Common Law and Civil Law systems in this quiz. Learn about how each system approaches legal rulings, the role of judges, and the significance of legal precedents and codified laws. Test your understanding of the judicial processes that shape legal frameworks worldwide.

    More Like This

    Comparing Common Law and Civil Law Systems
    14 questions
    Common Law vs. Civil Law Quiz Ⅱ
    24 questions
    Common Law vs. Civil Law Exam Quiz
    24 questions
    Common Law vs. Civil Law Overview
    64 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser