Clinical Performance of Ion-Releasing Bulk-Fill Composites Quiz

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to Lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What statistical tests were used for intergroup and intragroup comparisons in this study?

  • T-test and Mann-Whitney U test
  • Chi-square test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test
  • Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests (correct)
  • ANOVA and Tukey HSD test

What percentage of restorations had to be reintervened after 2 years?

  • 100%
  • 96.3%
  • 84.35%
  • 15.65% (correct)

Which composite showed a statistically significant decreased marginal integrity compared to resin composite at the 2-year evaluation?

  • Resin composite
  • Cention N (correct)
  • Surefil-one
  • Powerfil

What is one of the primary reasons for the failure of resin composite restorations as mentioned in the text?

<p>Polymerization issues (C)</p> Signup and view all the answers

What is one key factor mentioned that can improve the clinical performance of resin composite restorations?

<p>Optimal field isolation (D)</p> Signup and view all the answers

Flashcards are hidden until you start studying

Study Notes

Study on Clinical Performance of Ion-Releasing Bulk-Fill Composites

  • A randomized clinical trial evaluated the 2-year clinical performance of two ion-releasing bulk-fill composites (Cention N and Surefil One) compared to a conventional bulk-fill resin composite (Powerfil) in Class I and II cavities.

Materials and Methods

  • 32 patients with 3 Class I and/or Class II cavities under occlusion were enrolled in the trial, with a total of 96 restorations placed (32 for each material).
  • The restorations were placed by a single operator and evaluated at baseline (1-week), 6-months, 1-year, and 2-years by two independent examiners using the FDI criteria.

Results

  • 27 patients with a total of 81 restorations were evaluated at the end of the 2-years with 84.35% recall rates.
  • Clinical success rates were 100%, 100%, and 96.3% for Powerfil, Surefil-one, and Cention N, respectively.
  • Cention N showed a statistically significant (p < 0.05) decreased marginal integrity in comparison with resin composite at the 2-year evaluation.
  • No recurrent decay was detected in any restoration.

Conclusion

  • Both ion-releasing bulk-fill composites provided acceptable clinical performance similar to bulk-fill composite in Class I and II restorations over a 2-year period.

Studying That Suits You

Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

Quiz Team

More Like This

Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser