Cities: A New History of Humanity Insights
16 Questions
2 Views

Cities: A New History of Humanity Insights

Created by
@LawfulSugilite7180

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

What do Graeber and Wengrow argue about early cities?

  • They were predominantly hierarchical with rulers.
  • Agriculture was the sole factor in their development.
  • Cities emerged only after complex societies were established.
  • They were largely egalitarian and self-organizing. (correct)
  • The Ratchet Effect suggests it is easy to reverse a course of action once taken.

    False

    Name one of the four 'lost' cities mentioned in Newitz's book.

    Çatalhöyük, Pompeii, Angkor, or Cahokia

    Urban decline often results from a combination of political instability, environmental stress, and __________ decisions.

    <p>human</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match the following cities with their key characteristics:

    <p>Çatalhöyük = No apparent social hierarchy Pompeii = Roman city destroyed by a volcanic eruption Angkor = Major city in Cambodia with significant historical presence Cahokia = Ancient United States city with complex society</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a key challenge to achieving egalitarian governance in larger cities?

    <p>The Ratchet Effect</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Human agency is viewed by Graeber and Wengrow as a primary driver of social change.

    <p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

    According to the content, what does the relationship between cities and civilization suggest?

    <p>Cities are closely tied to the development and notion of civilization.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Which of the following statements best reflects Graeber and Wengrow's view on early urban societies?

    <p>Some early cities maintained egalitarian governance structures.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The Ratchet Effect implies that reversing a course of action is straightforward and often achievable.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Name one of the themes highlighted by the decline of urban areas like Çatalhöyük and Pompeii.

    <p>Political instability or environmental stress</p> Signup and view all the answers

    The relationship between cities and _______ suggests that hierarchy is often intertwined with urban development.

    <p>civilization</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Match each lost city with its key characteristic.

    <p>Çatalhöyük = No apparent social hierarchy Pompeii = Destroyed by volcanic eruption Angkor = Significant early Khmer civilization Cahokia = Large pre-Columbian settlement</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What is a significant challenge to sustaining egalitarian governance in larger urban areas?

    <p>The tendency to centralize power</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Graeber and Wengrow place significant emphasis on environmental and material constraints in driving social change.

    <p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

    What do the authors suggest regarding the creation of cities for those who have never seen one?

    <p>It poses significant challenges in understanding how to establish urban governance.</p> Signup and view all the answers

    Study Notes

    Cities: A New History of Humanity

    • Graeber & Wengrow's book challenges conventional views of societal development
    • Western political theory often misinterprets the evolution of cities
    • Examples of egalitarian city-states exist
    • Early examples include mega-sites in Ukraine and Teotihuacan
    • Teotihuacan shifted focus from monuments to high-quality housing (AD 300)
    • Cities like Catalhoyuk existed around 9,000 years ago
    • Technology wasn't the sole driver of urban development in Catalhoyuk
    • Other factors, such as civic unity and ancestor worship, were crucial
    • Early Ukrainian cities exhibited decentralized urbanization
    • Mesopotamia lacked wheeled vehicles, sailing ships, and animal-powered transport
    • Civic unity and devotion to ancestors likely unified groups in Catalhoyuk
    • Urban planning prioritized community involvement, not elite control

    Linear Social Evolution

    • The traditional model views societal development as a linear progression from simple to complex
    • Hunter-gatherer societies were egalitarian and simple
    • Agriculture led to societal hierarchies, surplus, and settled life
    • States and cities brought bureaucracy, inequality, and class divisions

    Social Inequality

    • Rousseau posited that early humans lived in egalitarian states of nature
    • Agriculture caused societal inequality
    • Other researchers link population growth and limited resources to the basis of inequality in many civilizations
    • Graeber & Wengrow argue that inequality wasn't inevitable
    • Many societies maintained levels of equality alongside surpluses
    • Urban development was multifaceted, with choices involved in whether to pursue power or equality

    Social Experimentation

    • Cities often oscillated between egalitarian and hierarchical systems
    • Early cities in Mesoamerica and Ukraine were egalitarian
    • Urban planning emphasized community involvement, not elite control
    • Teotihuacan prioritized public housing over palaces, defying elite power
    • Surpluses did not always lead to the development of rulers or social class systems

    Scaling Egalitarian Systems

    • Maintaining egalitarianism in larger communities is challenging
    • Large, complex populations necessitate structures for centralized decision-making and governance
    • Agriculture and complex governance make it difficult to reverse a course of action

    Key Questions and Lessons of Cities

    • The book explores the correlation between urban development and societal collapse
    • It challenges the relationship between cities and civilization
    • The study delves into the creation of cities in various settings
    • It questions whether cities are inherently hierarchical or not
    • It aims to learn from the success and failures of past urban centers
    • Key questions regarding urban development and societal collapse are proposed
    • The study examines four "lost" cities: Catalhoyuk, Pompeii, Angkor, and Cahokia
    • These cities illustrate the diversity and longevity of cities.

    Case Studies

    • Çatalhöyük (7100-5700 BCE): Early settlement with no apparent social hierarchy; declined due to environmental challenges.
    • Pompeii (79 CE): Roman city destroyed by a volcanic eruption; its artifacts provide insights into Roman daily life but also social class distinctions.
    • Angkor (800-1431 CE): Capital of the Khmer Empire; complex water infrastructure; collapsed due to political instability.
    • Cahokia (1050-1350 CE): Religious and cultural hub; declined due to leadership's authoritarianism and environmental shifts.

    Studying That Suits You

    Use AI to generate personalized quizzes and flashcards to suit your learning preferences.

    Quiz Team

    Related Documents

    Description

    Explore the groundbreaking perspectives presented in Graeber & Wengrow's work, which challenges traditional views of urban development and societal evolution. This quiz covers early city-states, the role of civic unity, and the misconception of technological determinism in urbanization.

    More Like This

    Spatial Policy and Planning Lecture 1-2
    31 questions
    La ciutat medieval
    5 questions
    History of Cities
    10 questions

    History of Cities

    MajesticPanther avatar
    MajesticPanther
    Tenements and Immigration Factors
    23 questions
    Use Quizgecko on...
    Browser
    Browser