Chaskalson P Case Summary
12 Questions
0 Views

Choose a study mode

Play Quiz
Study Flashcards
Spaced Repetition
Chat to lesson

Podcast

Play an AI-generated podcast conversation about this lesson

Questions and Answers

The accused were convicted on three counts of murder.

False

Counsel for the accused argued that the death penalty was consistent with the Republic of South Africa Constitution, 1993.

False

The Appellate Division overturned the convictions and sentences imposed by the trial court.

False

The Appellate Division postponed the hearing of the appeals against the death sentence.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Section 277(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Act No. 51 of 1977 prescribes that life imprisonment is a competent sentence for murder.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Republic of South Africa Constitution, 1993 came into force after the conviction and sentence by the trial court.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

The death sentence's constitutionality issue was raised during the trial.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

Evidence relevant to the death sentence's constitutionality issue was fully presented during the trial.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The case was referred back to the trial court for the hearing of further evidence.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The Appellate Division made a formal reference of the constitutional issues to the Court.

<p>True</p> Signup and view all the answers

Counsel were able to point out specific material that had not been presented before on the constitutional issues.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

The hearing of further evidence was deemed necessary by the Court.

<p>False</p> Signup and view all the answers

More Like This

Chaskalson P Case Summary
12 questions

Chaskalson P Case Summary

IrreplaceableNewOrleans4133 avatar
IrreplaceableNewOrleans4133
Use Quizgecko on...
Browser
Browser